Miscellaneous News

wuguanhui

Junior Member
Why is the EU shutting out Turkiye? They're one of the bigger militaries in NATO and control access into the Black Sea. What if Turkiye turns towards Moscow?
 

VishwaguruSteak

New Member
Registered Member
The big problem for Turkey is that their entire sales pitch to China was their customs union with the EU. The BYD factory was supposed to mostly sell to the EU. But the EU is now formulating new rules which would exclude Turkey's preferential treatment if BYD built a factory there.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So this isn't "China selling out Turkey". This is EU shutting Turkey out. But for some weird reason, the turks are lashing out at China. Stella Li of BYD has said publicly that the company's main focus is to increase production in Hungary. After that, they are scouting to find a second location inside of the EU.

In many ways, Turkey is trying to leverage its relationship with the EU in the same way that Israel tries to leverage its relationship with the US. But what happens when they can't? Their entire strategy falls to bits.
Same thing is happening to Morocco, where multiple Chinese companies have built factories to export to the EU thanks to advantageous trade agreements between Morocco & EU.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Same story as usual. Can't compete? Tariff

Mix in euro supremacism as Moroccans develop their own economy & people with the help of China.

For years, the EU has complained about migration from North Africa but now that their people have more economic opportunities at home and thus less migration, the EU can't abide
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
This reminds me of how Christianity fully took hold in the late Roman Empire even after Constantine, only Christina Roman’s were allowed to be promoted in the civil service (similar to Israeli aligned Americans and their Indian sepoys only hiring their own), and during the periods where Roman religions and paganism wasn’t outlawed, Christian’s enjoyed access and privileges that resulted in their propagation. Here we see American senators who owe their position to Israeli aligned sponsors and donors, enacting laws to facilitate more of the same Israeli infiltration and grip over American politics.

As I was saying, the new religion of “noahidism” means public officials must display fealty to the new religion over their mandated public duties. This indicates the level of infiltration that the Zionist lobby now has over the U.S. and eventually, over NATO.
 

zbb

Senior Member
Registered Member
I mean, scientifically the solution is pretty obvious: for certain countries, if China truly want to improve relations with them, China simply also need butcher thousands of their people. The social-historic reality is, a lot of cultures really do believe the strong has the right to abuse the weak, and they really do believe lack of abuse means lack of strength and as such give them the right to abuse, you really can't project egalitarian beliefs onto everyone.

e.g. if China actually wants to have friendly relations with Japan, China really do have to nuke them, it's literally why the majority of Japaneses believe they didn't lose WW2 to China. If China wants better relations with countries like India or Phillipines, China really do need to colonize them (I know it sounds awful), or simply bomb and butcher them, it really is what they want.

The idea that everyone believes in equality is fundamentally wrong. There really are two kind of cultures in the world: those who believe everyone is equal, that everyone are born the same and deserve the same (egalitarian cultures), and those who believe people are not equal and that it's the right of the better to take from the lesser (primitive cultures).

IMO it's a common and easy mistake for egalitarian cultures to make by assuming everyone else are equals and as such also egalitarian. Egalitarian beliefs really need to be adjusted to take into account objective cultural realities of primitive cultures:

You should only consider those who believe in equality as equals, for those who don't, you really need to treat them like s*, because they will love you if you do and treat you like s* if you don't. If this goes against your egalatarian beliefs, just remember that you're only respecting their culture by treating them like s*, to treat them as equals would be imposing your belief on them and that would be the actual abuse in their eyes.

At an individual level we know there are masocists, that a lot of people do seek to be dominated and abused, it's the exact same at national/cultural level and the way it evolved are exactly the same. We really need to accept objective scientific facts.
 

PandaAI

Junior Member
Registered Member
What are the numbers regarding the jobs that have been taken over by AI/robots? A large youth population is still far better than a population of geriatrics and robots. Developing countries still have options to industrialize through local legislation, they don't have to accept finished goods and packaging, that can be done at home. Furthermore, R&D belongs to no one and can be a driver of growth for developing countries (start ups, sale of technology, etc). Even if AI and robots take over labor, how are people going to work and make money to afford goods?

Countries that are dominated by AI+robotics will easily outcompete countries with cheap manual labour. It will dramatically accelerate during the next 5-10 years. It’s machines vs humans. Machines will always win especially as machines continuously get smarter with AI. Companies will use AI over paying for workers. If countries legislate against using AI, they will lose out to competitors around the world and fall further behind.

Agriculture is automated. Manufacturing is mostly automated already. Service sector is rapidly being automated in many industries. China is the last country that enjoyed the benefits of cheap labour before the AI and robotics revolution arrived. Foreign companies don’t need cheap manual labour like in the past to maximise profits. Countries with high youth populations are screwed. High youth unemployment leads to crime and revolution.

As for how people are going to work and afford goods? That’s the big question. Maybe a Universal Basic Income (UBI) for the wealthy countries that can afford such a program.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Most (if not all) developing countries can't afford to provide UBI. In fact, I don't see any country (perhaps excluding Norway) that can afford to provide UBI .... most people would simply not working and who is going to pay them? taxing tax payer 80%? nobody wants to work
 

supercat

Colonel

Translation: “You guys better die for America or somebody gonna get a hurting real bad”

and in any case, exactly what are these nations fighting for when they war against China? They’re just begging for their territory to be added to the PRC.


It’s clear China hasn’t forgotten about all that trump and USG under Biden did after 2017 and COVID and “China virus”, in fact a case can be made that the PRC is now relishing a conflict in east Asia to drive the U.S. out of the region and the U.S. is trying to avoid conflict as it runs out of rare earths.
After the Ukraine fiasco, you have to be a real idiot to fight for the US regime.

These Indians basically went to all the effort and trouble of creating fake twittter profiles and concocting a make believe alternate history China with a caste system. with the same amount of effort they could’ve solved their poo in the loo problem decades ago.

Long way to go: the deal will not be signed until June 19th.
Israel is still at it.
The deal itself is a mystery.

A generation of Chinese workers broke their backs to build the China we see today. Westoid propagandist: let's use the hardship one of the tens of millions of workers endured to smear China!

India will overtake China in 2060, according to India media.
 
Last edited:
Top