LMFAO, you said paranoia is good; I didn't. Now you don't want it anymore. LOL
to be alarmed by the situation since no other country has fixed its demographic problem. And the urgency required to reverse it is clearly not visible.
Yeah it is paranoid to have just about the largest population in the world and to face a problem that would only be generations away if the current trend could not be reversed. With the China changing every year for the better, I'm not worried; I would support thinking about it to see what can be done but I'm not alarmist. And the fact that no other country is fixing it means that we're in good company; it's not a unique problem but we have a much larger buffer.
We are talking about economics; why are you always going on and on about demographics? They banned a thread because of annoying alarmist shit like this.
You need mass as well, doesn't matter how developed you are, you need scale and development.
We got it and we got it for the forseeable future.
A country's sole purpose is not just to become a superpower, that is something only applicable to large countries in the first place. For most countries it is also to serve their citizens as best as possible.
OK then, it is not comparable between a country that wishes to fight for the world throne and a country that just wants to get along. Their challenges are very different.
Why can't you even imagine a China will 4 times the nominal GDP of US?
Who said I can't? I can imagine a billion times; can you? Why stop at 4, mental capacity reached? LOL
Look up any country that became developed from developing in terms of nominal GDP, you will find the trend.
The trend is that countries grow slower entering the developed phase. That's China, but we have extra, don't we? We fight monsters instead of begging them for things.
Just by your refuting it doesn't make the logic disappear.
Refuting with correct logic absolutely makes the oversimplified logic break. That's how debate works.
If it is, then all the more reason to launch a stimulus aimed at tech and getting the economy and domestic demand in better shape.
That's not a problem.
The domestic demand issue is so severe, that even the president himself is on record criticising the lack of demand.
It could be better, so could a lot of things, for every country. Doesn't mean it's worth a shit to make up numbers and saying you wish it were there.
But then how is it that an even larger fish (US) is growing faster? US has higher growth rates (nominal) despite growing from much larger base.
Because the US is a smaller fish and it's growing slower. Nominal rates are bullshit that anybody can manipulate. PPP is absolute. You have these stupid questions because it is your nature to twist things to look like America is doing better.
You have been excusing the need for a higher rate of growth. You should answer it.
Higher growth rate is great, but there is no need for it, because need means you will not survive without it. We are on track to surpass the US as is; higher growth rate makes it faster. Faster is great, but need is too harsh a word.
Trade is a significant chunk,
18%, much less than the domestic economy
and nominal GDP does matter to even tech growth because a higher nominal salary helps attract and retain talent, especially high tech talent which is globally mobile like a tradeable commodity.
Salaries are calibrated to cost of living in the area
Nominal GDP also matters to companies whose revenue and investment is in nominal figures.
Then they should use PPP
Please use any AI including chinese ones to understand why deflation coupled with low nominal growth is so harmful. It is an economist consensus.
Don't push your responsibilites on programs. If you have something to say, say it, and we'll stomp it. I'm not fighting AI; I'm beating you.
You are clearly making that up.
You are clearly making your entire argument about economics up, just like you did about tech, because you have very little knowledge but a very big mouth.
I will post data later that actually tells how many Chinese PhDs stay in US, and the trend.
LMFAO, "later," cus you need to do some excel manipulating, including and excluding to make it look like what you want. It takes me 2 minutes when I don't manipulate anything.
But it seems you don't understand that when China is moving faster than the US and the brain drain is decreasing, it's all inclusive and set to accelerate China's overtake.
Nope, you are even misrepresenting what I did get right, which was the name of the lithography company in Japan.
You're so funny, bragging about getting the name of a company right when you don't understand what the technology is.
Not what lithography itself is or the like. That you are stuck to one incident of me remembering the name wrong shows how hollow this effort is, to seize my mistakes.
No, your common mistakes are everywhere. Measuring the economy by nominal instead of PPP is a high school level mistake.
How is having dominant market share of these products related to fake paper money?
Market is all about buying and manipulating who can buy even if your tech is inferior. But in the end, superior tech always wins everything.
Dude, US is literally positioned on China's doorsteps. Please have some humility and don't talk nonsense. US has, literally prevented, China's reunification.
Dude, that's what the US managed at the end of WWII when it was at its strongest and China at our weakest. You ask for humility but you cannot show any, and you certain don't keep up with the changing times and power dynamic.
A lot of people care about nominal.
Meaning just you?
You might not be the one, that's ookay.
Or the rest of us. Or my econ professors. Or the books that tell us how to measure the domestic economy.
Most countries have no control over their currencies, China does have some control, however, appreciation to that extent where tomorrow it becomes a larger economy than US will have huge negative effects, so won't be countenanced.
So stop asking for it! You're the only dipshit asking for it!
Let me quote Andy Grove from Intel, "Only the paranoid survive."
Oh shit, if Andy Grove said it, it must be true, huh? So if anybody is alive and not paranoid, what does that make Mr. Grove?
An apple is a tradeable commodity. Even if it were grown in India, US would pay only marginally higher for it to import and transport it. The high costs in a grocery store include the rent, grocer margins, labor cost in the US which would make it more expensive.
And that is how stupid you are. An apple is eaten for enjoyment and nutrition so people can work, braindead market slave.
-------------------------------------------
I am not going to reply any more.
You're not gonna reply anymore because you're always wrong, run away, then say the same stupid defeated shit over and over again. See you next time; I'll be here with my roach-stompin' boots again.
It's clear we both have different thoughts, and are unable to influence each other.
I figured you weren't smart enough to learn a long time ago. I'm here so other people can watch watch this beatdown I'm giving you.
