More like the Isayama (The Creator) ruined his character at the end. He turned him into a crybaby simp.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
supercat
Colonel
China's demographic crisis is greatly exaggerated. According to Glenn Luk (graph below), by the 2040s:
The China rare earths problem isn't as bad as we think. It's much worse: a look at gallium
Here is the brilliant idea, Department of War should start buying the GaN based mobile chargers from Chyna and start licking them...
Last edited:
I like how AOT kinda died after the ending and no one talks about it anymore. Same as Game of Thrones.
Even when a series ends, if its truly memorable and ends on a good note, it will still be talked about such as Naruto which ended over 10 years ago. But when you have a really bad ending, it kills off people's will to talk about it anymore.
Might be a bad sign for Japan then.
AOT is basically about him getting bullied in middle school. The highschoolers are the titans next door. If the writer is American he would have been a school shooter. This is quite obvious as he made reference of the idea in several of his extra art works and side stories like "attack on high school".
Once the edgy guy became succesful and married he mellowed out. He can no longer write edgy story with inspiration so it crashed down. Bad ending for story good ending for writer. He will be a sauna owner instead.
Apparently, there are Chinese robots patrolling the Indian border now. Unless the object was misidentified and it isn’t a robot but some other observation tool.
Philippine Navy: Huawei has no backdoors, so we're using Huawei laptops in a drill against China. 
DPP bros accidentally letting their inner 明粉 slip out for a sec.
My two cents is that, there's on paper strength and how effectively one mobilizes that strength. I'm not even being sanguine here, these past few years have given us glimpses of the capacity of the US to both coordinate its allies in response to crisis and the capacity of its own allies to pick up the slack when the US is absent. I think when it comes to Europe the results are as clear as day. They lack the war production capacity and the will to unify in response to a crisis on its own friggin doorstep. The conflict is not even far off, as Russian FSB agents have been operating in Europe and drones occasionally violate the airspace of NATO nations, but Europe still can't agree on how to respond and is ever beholden to electorates who think little of the geopolitical consequences of the war and would rather focus on cost of living, housing, and migration. And that's militarily speaking, on the economic front they've essentially all but admitted defeat against China.
And going against the grain, I do believe the temperature from India has been toned down significantly. They no doubt would take advantage of the situation if they sensed China was losing, but considering that since the Bangladesh coup India does not have a single friend in its neighborhood anymore, its hands are tied.
Imo, the only US allies that it could fully count on joining in a China contingency without question are Aus, Japan, and the Philippines. Even South Korea, despite all the hoopla about netizens from both countries having beef over Hanbok and Kimchi, mostly remains neutral on China issues and has North Korea to keep their hands tied.
And then there's the US itself, where around the globe it has the bigger military than China, but around the globe being the operative words since China was always going to engage the US's pacific operations rather than its whole military, which from the looks of it can become bogged down in Latin America pretty soon.
Obviously, China won't go bum rushing into conflict. Either way you cut it wars are expensive and would throw a wrench into Chinese economic development, the government's number one priority to the Chinese nation. But if things did come to blows, I would say the playing field is a little more level than one would believe.