Miscellaneous News

plawolf

Lieutenant General
It's much more about Chinese willingness to get into a confrontation with the west in a region that's not favourable to China. If China could bleed the west by arming Venezuela or Iran, it would be stupid not to do so and allow them to fall to the Western camp, from a purely military perspective. Engaging in a proxy war with the US today in Venezuela would just be very costly for the Chinese exporters that still depend on Western markets. Maybe this will change as non western markets develop

But the argument that it's up to the middle and small powers to seek favour from the superpower doesn't make sense. If a superpower doesn't support countries on its own side, then it's simply not going to have any allies.

And how would turning Iran or Venezuela into China’s Ukraine where it’s a black hole for weapons and money help China?

Russia supported Assad to the hilt, as much as they can, even to the detriment of battlefield outcomes in Ukraine, how has that investment paid off?

Also, just because America toppled a leader doesn’t make there the eternal masters of the land and people. Just look to Iraq and Afghanistan.

This is the fundamental difference in Chinese and western thinking. China is far more flexible and pragmatic in its strategic assessment and thinking.

China will not provide support just because you say you are against someone. First you need to prove that you can actually make good use of that support.

What good is sending advanced weapons to Iran only for tailors to leak their location for the Israelis to bomb? You cannot turn a bad investment into a good one by dumping more and more money into it. All you will be doing is throwing away good money after the bad.

And as I touched upon earlier. Just because America invaded somewhere and toppled its leader doesn’t mean America gets to keep what it has killed. If the incumbent regime is worthless and easily toppled, it’s far better for China to wait for organic resistance movements to form against the occupation and see who is actually combat effective and partner with them.

Even where the local population is docile and doesn’t actively resist, what usually happens is that China just comes in and ask them if they like money. If they do, then China will just trade with them in China’s preferred win-win way, and before long America’s guy in charge is now just as much as China’s guy. China is perfectly happy for them to remain loyal to both superpowers, but if America forces them to choose, they will usually choose America openly for show, but secretly choose China for real. Not only is China’s method way cheaper than military action, it’s far more effective and China makes a profit to boot.

Yes, there will come a time when China needs to show its teeth and choose to stand and fight. But Iran and Venezuela are not the time or place.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Moldova is literally the exact parallel with Taiwan and HK because Moldova is literally a Romania region that away by the Russian and then they're brainwashed into thinking their not Romanian despite speaking romanian and literally are. This is the exact same thing with Taiwan and HK. China literally saved Romania from a Soviet Invasion in 1968 because Mao open delcared China would intervene in USSR invades Romania. While Russia is against Kosovo they were also backing Tranistria at the same time and used Kosovo as pretext against Georgia and Ukraine. Long story short China is the only country that has their hands clean compared to both Russia and the West.
Russia or Soviets had to use heavy hand due to these past experiences with areas captured.
when you read RT Arabic it is like counter they put on Ukraine population decline as if some one is waiting for replacement.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ottoman-Moldavian relations continued during the reign of Murad II, and after the conquest of Constantinople, this principality became a part of the Ottoman Empire. The Soviet Union established the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic in the region east of the Dniester in 1924. After Romania ceded Bessarabia to the Soviet Union during World War II, the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic, one of the fifteen union republics that formed this union, was born. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Moldavian Republic declared its independence and joined the Commonwealth of Independent States, formed by former Soviet republics, in late 1991 (Özcan, 271).
 

supercat

Colonel
Keep in mind that a lot of Westerners are brainrotted enough to think that infrastructure is a poor allocation of capital.
Building infrastructures benefits the public. Therefore, the sheeple have to be brainwashed to believe that investment for their own good is a "bad thing".

In a few years, China will still be a leader of rare-earth technology, as well as having the technology to maker their own EUV machines.

Gaslighting tweet of the day:
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Building infrastructures benefits the public. Therefore, the sheeple have to be brainwashed to believe that investment for their own good is a "bad thing".

In a few years, China will still be a leader of rare-earth technology, as well as having the technology to maker their own EUV machines.

Gaslighting tweet of the day:
If money can make anything happen then Zimbabwe is a global superpower. There is fundamentally nothing different between the Zimbabwe and US dollars except use of force.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Can farmers survive without China?​

Many of the ag economy’s woes can be tied to skyrocketing input costs and plummeting trade with China. During an interview with Farm Progress, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins blamed this year’s record ag trade deficit on President Joe Biden, saying he did not negotiate enough trade deals.

During that Oct. 15 interview, Rollins also called Biden out for “not enforcing” the Phase 1 trade agreement that required China to purchase an additional $200 billion in U.S. agricultural goods.

That deal, agreed to in late 2019, came right before the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2018, in the wake of the first Trump administration’s trade war with China, U.S. soybean exports plummeted to $3.12 billion. In 2020, despite global trade disruptions, U.S. soybean exports to China rose to $14.07 billion. That upward trajectory continued through 2022, when China purchased $17.92 billion of U.S. soybeans. Still, China did not come close to buying an additional $200 billion in U.S. ag goods.

Why China didn’t depends on who you ask. Some, like Rollins, point the finger at the Biden administration. Others say continued disputes on a host of issues doomed progress toward further agreements.

Regardless of the blame, a proposed Phase 2 agreement never happened during Biden’s term. By 2024, U.S. soybean exports to China had fallen to $12.64 billion. Still, China remained far and away the biggest export market for U.S. soybeans, accounting for more than half of all international sales.

This year, in the wake of the latest tariff war between the U.S. and China, soybean farmers have seen their largest export market basically disappear. As of mid-October, China had yet to order any soybeans from the United States.

The two nations have recently attempted to restart trade negotiations, though there has been little progress. Each potential breakthrough has seemingly been followed by another stumbling block.

“The bottom line for me is we can't continue to rely on China as one of our key trading partners,” Rollins said.

Wanted: New trade partners

The secretary is not alone in calling for the U.S. to pivot away from China. During a September panel discussion at Husker Harvest Days, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican, said the time had come to “stop buying stuff from China” and recognize “what a foreign adversary” it is. Among the reasons he cited is the fact that China is “working together” with Russia, Iran and North Korea, three nations that have been antagonistic toward the U.S.

Pillen cited recent progress toward a trade deal with Japan as an example of how the U.S could survive without China. He had high praise for Tokyo, calling it the cleanest place you will find.

“It’s maybe almost as safe as what we have here in Nebraska,” Pillen said, praising the nation for its discipline, civility and lack of obesity. “It’s a country that we need to be primary partners with and doing business.”

While it’s doubtful a correlation between a nation’s per-capita body weight and purchase of exports can be quantitated, there is no doubt that more trade with Japan would be welcome news for farmers. That nation has the world’s fourth-largest economy and a positive relationship with the U.S.

Rollins agreed that the key to helping farmers with international trade lies in striking deals with new markets. She credits President Donald Trump for being directly involved in framing new trade deals with Japan, Indonesia, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the European Union.

While Rollins acknowledged it will take a “little while” for the markets to adjust, she said she’s confident it will happen. And when it does, she said there will be much less volatility for soybean farmers, sorghum producers and others.

“These are really significant policy issues and discussions that now are coming to the forefront, thanks to President Trump’s leadership and him being unwilling to accept the status quo on any of this,” Rollins said. “He’s truly making history, but in the best way, and putting America first. And that’s why I think this China question in the short term is really tough for farmers. But in the long term, I think the president’s commitment is to do everything he can to solve for it, so that they’re not in this position again.”

If not China, then who?

China’s 1.4 billion people account for more than 17% of the world’s population. By comparison, the combined populations of Japan, Indonesia, Taiwan, the U.K. and the EU is only 950 million. That population difference is over 100 million people more than the entire population of the United States.

The Trump administration promises more trade deals will come. In the past week, news began to leak that the U.S and Argentina are working toward a trade deal. Rollins said that might help some row crop farmers.

However, the deal does not come without controversy. In September, the U.S. provided Argentina with $20 billion in financial support to stabilize its economy. Almost immediately, Argentina briefly suspended its commodity tariffs and China promptly bought over a million tons of its soybeans. This occurred during a time when U.S. soybean exports typically ramp up.

In a public statement following that news, Caleb Ragland, American Soybean Association president, called on the Trump administration to secure a trade deal with China. He noted that China is not only the top U.S. export market, but also the world’s largest soybean consumer.

According to Ragland, the lack of U.S. exports to China is a direct result of the 20% retaliatory tariffs imposed by China in response to U.S. tariffs. This, he said, has allowed Brazil and Argentina to capture market share at the direct expense of U.S. farmers.

“The frustration is overwhelming,” Ragland said on Sept. 24. “U.S. soybean prices are falling, harvest is underway, and farmers read headlines not about securing a trade agreement with China, but that the U.S. government is extending $20 billion in economic support to Argentina, while that country drops its soybean export taxes to sell 20 shiploads of Argentine soybeans to China in just two days.”

Playing favorites

Now less than a month later, the Trump administration is reportedly considering giving Argentina an additional $20 billion in financial aid. Trump has called its president, Javier Milei, his favorite president.

Uncoincidentally, Argentina will hold legislative elections Oct. 26. In recent opinion polls, Milei’s approval rating has dropped below 40%. If his party does not do well in the elections, he may not be able to pass much of his agenda. On Sept. 15, Trump told reporters the U.S. “won’t waste time” with Argentina if voters don’t support Milei’s party.

This does not sit well with House Ag Committee Ranking Member Angie Craig, D-Minn. She said Argentine assistance during a shutdown is a betrayal of American family farmers.

“This is such a slap in the face to family farmers who are hurting like crazy right now because of Trump’s trade war,” she said in an Oct. 15 social media post. “Donald Trump and Republicans are, literally, bailing out our competitor and leaving family farmers in the dust. It’s egregious.”

Apparently, it is Biden fault that China isn’t buying US Soybeans.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins blamed this year’s record ag trade deficit on President Joe Biden, saying he did not negotiate enough trade deals.

And the Americans is only interested in China propping up US farmers until the Chinese market is replaced. They want China to bail them out so they can prepare the next trade war with less vulnerabilities.

Rollins agreed that the key to helping farmers with international trade lies in striking deals with new markets. She credits President Donald Trump for being directly involved in framing new trade deals with Japan, Indonesia, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the European Union.
“The bottom line for me is we can't continue to rely on China as one of our key trading partners,” Rollins said.
 

wuguanhui

Junior Member
Yeah or if Myanmar breaks up Kachin and Shan states could to join China via uniting with Yunnan.
Why on earth would Beijing allow that?


Our best case scenario is a Chinese naval base in Myanmar.
Our worse case scenario is a US naval base in Myanmar.

Guess what annexing Kachin and Shan makes more likely?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tse
Top