Miscellaneous News

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Ukraine just made neutral and pro-Russia parties illegal after 2014. The current regime came through power in a foreign sponsored coup. The government is illegitimate in the first place.

Russia has held Ukraine as part of its Empire for longer than the US has existed. Modern Russia would have accepted an independent neutral Ukraine, but not an hostile member of an aggressive expansionistic military block.
 
Last edited:

Expert1324

Junior Member
Registered Member
Department of Homeland Security - not subtitle at all.

View attachment 162749
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Probability of going camping for those in the US just went up.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Screenshot 2025-10-18 062213.png

So literal state sponsored genocide, and the government is not even hiding it. And this is somehow ok, but China's countering of literal violent Islamic terrorism is not ok accord the Muslim loving nations of Israel and US and their fellow lackeys of western nations. What a joke.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-10-18 062402.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-18 062402.png
    212.4 KB · Views: 15

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
American and European automakers are not the only ones hurt by China's Nexperia export ban. Other European companies are also affected, such as Bosch, ASML, Siemens, and Airbus. It's as though Europe is not deindustrializing fast enough for the pleasure of the Trump regime.

LMAO tweet - $1B-$2 billion/year vs $200-300 billion/year:
Its funny how they thought RE export control was China's full hand, when simply banning export from just a single company's China production is enough to shut down the entire western auto industry, lol
 

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
Department of Homeland Security - not subtitle at all.

View attachment 162749
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Probability of going camping for those in the US just went up.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I mean, to be fair, it could just mean they want to go back to Europe.
Now that they brought it up, I think it's one of the few idea worth considering as a condition for allowing the west to buy RE.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
DO NOT blindly defend Russian actions in Ukraine!!! Unless you are a client of Russia, there is zero reason or excuse to be clients to anyone.

Russia is invading a sovereign nation that is internationally recognized (including Russia itself)!!! Whether this invasion is justified or not due to NATO expansionism is completely a different conversation! I reiterate, Russian is invading an internationally recognized sovereign nation, this is NOT a civil conflict situation like the PRC and ROC within China, or the Ukrainian government against Donbass region of Ukraine. This at the end of the day is a plain and naked aggression imposed on a foreign country, so this is not some action that can be actively and casually be supported!

Also, we do not have any reliable information on civilian casualties on both sides due to extensive propaganda and muddied information from everywhere. So, your statement is completely unfounded and lacked basis.

As I said before, settler-colonialism and the BS narrative of "protecting Russian speakers that we ourselves pushed to settle in X region" had always been the typical Russian playbook for invasion of foreign lands, and had in fact been used to invade large amounts of Chinese lands historically. All in all, this is a very complex issue. On one hand we strongly oppose and hate NATO expansionism and aggression, on the other hand, I also cannot in good conscience fully support or condone Russian's typical invasion playbook and BS for expansionism.

This is also not only about good conscience, but also about that fact that a support towards such a war-mongering logic, whims of conquest and blatant Russian expansionism, it inevitably threatens the very fabrics of nationhood, which also directly and indirectly harms our own legitimacy as a peaceful and lawful nation upholding our own sovereignty!!! This is not the pile of shit I will casually walk into without a precise and rational navigation! (Especially not for a country that we still need to 算账 in the future)
What is sacred about post 1945 internationally recognized borders? In fact, post 1945 borders have immense injustice, just as you stated about Russia.

You believe current border of northeast China is unjust and we don't need to care about the internationally recognized border. Russia uses your exact logic applied to Ukraine.

If you think China can change its mind, OK well Russia changed its mind too.

Either post 1945 borders are all solid and can't be touched or borders are fluid and nobody has any rights other than what they can defend. Can't have it both ways.
 

supercat

Colonel

The issue isn’t so much that the U.S. has taken on Chinese practices and characteristics, it’s that it apes the appearances of chinese policies but is unable to shed its rentier predatory financier model, so the real effect is to resemble nazi germany as a command economy as opposed to Chinas mixed communist market economy of national champions.
It's probably too litter too late for the US regime. Here is what Paul Krugman wrote. Krugman was the sole winner of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2008. For those who has no patience to read, you can just watch Electric Viking's video clip.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In a related note, the U.S. has to resort to trade war because they can't compete with China fairly.

I don't know how old the clip is. China has room to improve by providing affordable housing for migrant workers in the cities if the video is recent. On the other hand, these migrant workers may sleep by the employment agency on purpose, so they won't miss the opportunity of employment the next day, despite available housing.

Taco Trump, nuff said.

Written by a female diaspora Chinese "reporter":
OslXMbs.jpg
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
TACO. He is absolutely looking for a face saving exit.
I wonder if Trump is going to be the last leader who Xi will have a bilateral meeting in the coming APAC summit, or if Xi is going to meet him at all because I am sensing a change of tide (China's tactic). It was always that US fire the first shot by making a demand/sanction, China retaliate, then the talk. But the recent RE fight seems to show that China is taking a more proactive position, fire a shot first (restriction in force immediately), then US threaten to retaliate (100% tariff) but not in place yet.
 
Top