Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
manqiangrexue said:
Yeah this is why Trump said, F it with China cus America needs to work on domestic security. If the US economy keeps squeezing the poor like it is now, that's him and Melania. This and the Chinese military parade are why he's looking inwards now.
Click to expand...
Yup, that's probably why Trump, Melania and the Sec of War are behind bullet-proof glass panels during their own military parade.
16751744_061425-cc-ap-military-parade-hegseth-trump-melania-img.jpg
 
E

ember

New Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Even if there is rampant corruption and rightful citizen anger, it still doesn't mean that there is no foreign involvement. Colour revolutions are notorious for hijacking genuine protests, provoking violence, and then push it towards a colour revolution. The Ukrainian Euro Maidan is a prime example. Yanukovich was corrupted. People were right to protest, but then the CIA hijacked the protests and turned it into a colour revolution.

You must not be so quick to dismiss this foreign-backed angle. There is no evidence saying that it is not a colour revolution either. Let's see who comes to power soon, that'll give us a clue as to what had truly happened. If it is a Western-educated, pro-West, anti-China, anti-India politician. That's our red flag.
Click to expand...
From 2019 to 2024 USAID in Nepal funded a project named Tayar, which literally means "prepare." Under the guise of disaster risk management they trained and prepared over 1000 Nepalese color revolutionaries. It's the same old playbook as in Ukraine.
 
G

GodRektsNoobs

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Even if there is rampant corruption and rightful citizen anger, it still doesn't mean that there is no foreign involvement. Colour revolutions are notorious for hijacking genuine protests, provoking violence, and then push it towards a colour revolution. The Ukrainian Euro Maidan is a prime example. Yanukovich was corrupted. People were right to protest, but then the CIA hijacked the protests and turned it into a colour revolution.

You must not be so quick to dismiss this foreign-backed angle. There is no evidence saying that it is not a colour revolution either. Let's see who comes to power soon, that'll give us a clue as to what had truly happened. If it is a Western-educated, pro-West, anti-China, anti-India politician. That's our red flag.
Click to expand...
You are absolutely right. Look at the protests in Nepal and Indonesia and compare that to what's happening in the Philippines. Entire towns were flooded and many people lost everything... and yet not a single protest. Make no mistake about it, while incompetence is common place within the governments of the global south, we should be wary of western elites taking advantage of the protests for their own gain.
 
P

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
neutralobserver said:
Shining Example of "Arabic softpower" @pmc
Click to expand...
This is The Arabic Soft Power. Qatar may have provided economic life line to countries that Saudis not like or that Turkish base should be evicted. regardless Israel demonstrated reliability of its airpower working long distance and no countries in the region inform Qatar about it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal: Hamas leaders did not listen to God's directives (video)
Click to expand...
 
BoraTas

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
JimmyMcFoob said:
Why are people so eager to jump on the foreign-backed angle? The protests in Nepal were peaceful before police cracked down, killing 19. You're denying the agency of the Nepalese, who are obviously very mad at the rampant corruption and nepotism in the (former) government. The "spark," the banning of social media sites, was actually a symptom of the government trying to hide their corruption. Why would Western governments even care about Nepal? 4-5 days is not enough to get assets in place to stir chaos, if they were even any.

And that's why corruption is a rot that must be purged ASAP and not let it fester, lest you get this.
Click to expand...
There is a reason why China doesn't back governments just because they are slightly friendly to China. A lot of them are actually quite weak and are deficient in integrity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top