China has conditionally lifted the seafood import ban from Japan with the exceptions of seafood from 10 Japanese prefectures, including Fukushima.
Only at an extremely high level, a level irrelevant for 99% of people anyways. If you look at director level management in the most elite software companies, or managing directors on Wall Street, East Asians are still overrepresented there.We are talking about two different things. Glass ceiling is not about entering elite social group but about being turned down for promotion in favor of less competent or less qualified people. Basically anti-meritocracy for flimsy or fake excuses that really just boil down to racism.
I agree there is a cause and effect relationship between media portrayal and crimes against Asians, but these crimes are being committed by private citizens and not an example of government oppression.Well... there is a very big difference between government-instituted legal oppression, and actual ground-level oppression. There are no anti-Asian laws in the US (anymore) but Asian people (women, elderly) are targetted on the streets by delinquents because of the hatred that is hinted at by the government's hostility to China, and by extension, Chinese people, and by extension, all Asians as for as street thugs can tell.
Yes, that is a good example of oppression. However, this is a pretty recent development. Let me ask you this though: if China were to pass a law banning US nationals from working in rare earths research- would you condemn it as government oppression?There are also government institutions and teams in the US specifically for investigating and harrassing scientists of Chinese blood in America. That causes a terrible work environment and lack of trust/amiability. Higher institutions of learning are less likely to select Asians than other ethnic groups when achievements are the same because Asians achieve so much higher academically. Scientific institutions are reluctant to hire scientists of Chinese ethnic background in fear that they would be investigated or are actual spies if they believe what is told to them by the government.
All things equal, you will get further as a Caucasian in the US than as any other race. That is oppression.
That sounds exactly like what a Democrat party voter or leader (behind closed doors) would say. This has nothing to do with corporate or management representation as a % of the population. It has to do with hiring and promoting based on merit. This happens more on the cutting edge of technical work like in AI, pharma, etc., but when you look at management in corporate organizations in general (not cherry picking by only looking at "elite" software companies or Wall Street), ethnic Chinese are still vastly underrepresented relative to their % share of the local metro area, state, or national population (since that's more alike the measuring stick you seem to value over others). And speaking of giant elite tech or finance companies, some people here have worked for some of them and a quick look at an org chart shows what you're saying about overrepresentation is total BS. Overrepresented in individual contributor engineering or science roles? Maybe sometimes depending on the company, state, city, or office. Overrepresented in management roles or at a national level? Not even close. And even if that were to somehow be or become true, it's still not the right measuring stick. The right measuring stick is hiring and promoting by merit regardless of any hard or soft quotas for ethnic or racial representation. Same goes for education admission quotas (hard or soft). As for excluding them from political decision making roles in government, or military, that is obviously completely reasonable.East Asians are still overrepresented there.
Having spent 15+ years across a half dozen elite software companies, I have more than sufficient data. You do realize management and IC are different tracks do you? East Asians are more likely to gravitate towards IC track. Frankly, unless you can make it to director or higher, IC is the better route to pick in tech. First two levels of management is basically for people that fail to advance along the IC track. You cannot expect the representation in management to follow the representation amongst ICs, but relative to the general population East Asians are still significantly over represented at the director level.And speaking of giant elite tech or software companies, some people here have worked for some of them and a quick look at an org chart shows what you're saying about overrepresentation is total BS. Overrepresented in individual contributor engineering roles? Maybe sometimes. Overrepresented in management roles? Not even close. And even if that were to somehow be or become true, it's still not the right measuring stick. The right measuring stick is hiring and promoting by merit regardless of any hard or soft quotas for ethnic or racial representation. As for excluding them from political decision making roles in government, that is obviously reasonable.
I think it would be a bad thing if Chinese were statistically represented equally across a large number of fields relative to population. White Americans are pretty sensitive about things like this. And you can cry oppression and racism all you want, but lynched is lynched and dead is dead. For all the talk about equality in the US, most ethnic minorities should follow the adage: "Out of sight, out of mind."That sounds exactly like what a Democrat party voter or leader (behind closed doors) would say. This has nothing to do with corporate or management representation as a % of the population. It has to do with hiring and promoting based on merit. This happens more on the cutting edge of technical work like in AI, pharma, etc., but when you look at management in corporate organizations in general (not cherry picking by only looking at "elite" software companies or Wall Street), ethnic Chinese are still vastly underrepresented relative to their % share of the local metro area, state, or national population (since that's more alike the measuring stick you seem to value over others). And speaking of giant elite tech or finance companies, some people here have worked for some of them and a quick look at an org chart shows what you're saying about overrepresentation is total BS. Overrepresented in individual contributor engineering or science roles? Maybe sometimes depending on the company, state, city, or office. Overrepresented in management roles or at a national level? Not even close. And even if that were to somehow be or become true, it's still not the right measuring stick. The right measuring stick is hiring and promoting by merit regardless of any hard or soft quotas for ethnic or racial representation. Same goes for education admission quotas (hard or soft). As for excluding them from political decision making roles in government, or military, that is obviously completely reasonable.