Miscellaneous News

PLAwatcher12

Junior Member
Registered Member
He's also a disgusting hypocrite. It's only oppression when a foreign institution stops (or punishes) people from doing things he approves of abroad. When his own institutions stops (or punishes) people from doing things he disapproves of, it's law enforcement. In other words, he's a natural imperialist as he believes his own society or government's views and judgements should be enforced globally. No other values, laws, or judgements from others abroad carry any legitimacy or weight in his eyes, unless they align with his own society/government.
When did I say that I think both are bad but not allowing your citizens to leave the country or banning the internet is a lot more oppressive than banning TikTok and stuff like that. Also pro Palestine protests are allowed in every western country some have restrictions on them and some were banned than that uplifted
Why should they do that? Should the US give up any American citizen if a foreign country designates him as a terrorist and demands him to be sent over? This shows your pro-Western bias masquarading as some kind of bleeding heart garbage.

Oh that's the precise definition of oppressive? What professor told you that it was this narrow? Did s/he (maybe zee? LOL) say that locking people up over wearing pro-Russian t-shirts is NOT oppressive? Did your professor tell you that banning Pro-Palestinian protests on campus while allowing Pro-Iraeli protests is NOT oppressive?

When a Western country tries to ban people from accessing TikTok, is that part of the internet? Is that oppressive?

It doesn't matter what you mean by "oppressive," child. It matters what the word actually means and it encompasses all of these.
Are you trying to say the mastermind behind 9/11 who killed people in other countries and the UN along with China and Russia recognized as such isn’t actually a terrorist group? And yes some of that stuff is oppressive but the pro Palestine protests in western countries aren’t banned some are restricted but still allowed France tried to ban it but the courts ruled it as unconstitutional. But North Korea not allowing the internet and their people not to leave the country is oppressive and more so than what the rest is doing.
 

Tse

Junior Member
Registered Member
I have dealt with those things just because your invaded and the west hates you doesn’t mean you should bar your citizens from the internet and bar them from leaving the country. And isn’t sad that a “child” is smarter than you?

lol, the US supports ISIS and Al-Qaeda so much that they bomb them to hell. Yes the US was the reason why ISIS rose but not why Al-Qaeda came and they 100% don’t support ether and I could care less if the US invaded Syria. Assad was a ruthless dictator his country didn’t want him there. And the US never invaded Syria to fight Assad they did support the rebels though fighting Assad but US troops were there helping fight back ISIS.
This is an email from Hilary Clinton as Secretary of state explicitly stating that the US intended to arm rebels overthrow Assad, purely to advance Israeli interests. This leak has been out for a decade, and the fact that people are still unaware of it is frightening and should frighten you as well. Right now Syria is ruled by a branch faction of the Al Qaeda who had been supported by the US allies throughout the civil war and not attacked. Now they are executing religious minorities everywhere. The US and EU are establishing friendly relations with the regime now. What does that tell you about news coverage on foreign affairs?

News flash, the US bans travellers on the basis of political memes in their social media; UK and Germany have arrested old retirees on "hate speech" charges because they called some politicians or policies stupid on the internet. All of these incidents are readily available information but somehow doesn't get publicized much. I wonder why?
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20250309-WA0003.jpg
    IMG-20250309-WA0003.jpg
    209.1 KB · Views: 5

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
When did I say that I think both are bad but not allowing your citizens to leave the country or banning the internet is a lot more oppressive than banning TikTok and stuff like that.
No it's not. An internet firewall is the same as banning TikTok. That's being selective on what part of the digital content your people can access. North Korea doesn't allow people to leave; America targets racial groups and has the police kill them, then the courts vindicate the officers. The latter is much more oppressive.
Also pro Palestine protests are allowed in every western country some have restrictions on them and some were banned than that uplifted
The president threatening to defund universities that allow pro-Palestinian protests is not oppressive? Picking out legal immigrants and residents and students and deporting them for supporting these protests is not oppressive? LOL
Are you trying to say the mastermind behind 9/11 who killed people in other countries and the UN along with China and Russia recognized as such isn’t actually a terrorist group?
American presidents have been responsible for starting wars that have killed far more people. If any country should give up Bin Laden, the US should give up such a president when demanded.
And yes some of that stuff is oppressive but the pro Palestine protests in western countries aren’t banned some are restricted
Not banned... but restricted... so it's not oppressive? Reread that.
but still allowed France tried to ban it but the courts ruled it as unconstitutional.
Trying to ban it is oppressive. Putting up barriers to those protests that are not present for Pro-Israeli protests is racist and oppressive. That's just France.
But North Korea not allowing the internet and their people not to leave the country is oppressive and more so than what the rest is doing.
No, I think locking people up for t-shirt choice and banning free political choice is more oppressive. It's even worse what the West is doing because they pretend to be liberal when North Korea pretends to be nothing. The West is far worse and more oppressive.
No a child is someone younger than 18 I’m older than 18 so by the definition of a child I’m not one.
Are you trying to act cute? LOL This is how my daughter talks when she's told she can do something when she's an adult.
 
Last edited:

Tse

Junior Member
Registered Member
When did I say that I think both are bad but not allowing your citizens to leave the country or banning the internet is a lot more oppressive than banning TikTok and stuff like that. Also pro Palestine protests are allowed in every western country some have restrictions on them and some were banned than that uplifted

Are you trying to say the mastermind behind 9/11 who killed people in other countries and the UN along with China and Russia recognized as such isn’t actually a terrorist group? And yes some of that stuff is oppressive but the pro Palestine protests in western countries aren’t banned some are restricted but still allowed France tried to ban it but the courts ruled it as unconstitutional. But North Korea not allowing the internet and their people not to leave the country is oppressive and more so than what the rest is doing.
most of the internet is run by US NED and USAID funded front organisations (go look at what kinds of organisations were mentioned during the DOGE reviews), so North Korea banning them is equivalent of the US and EU banning "adversary apps" like those made by Chinese companies. Which is something they have actually done. "Allowing" something that you yourself created is not freedom at all.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
When did I say that I think both are bad but not allowing your citizens to leave the country or banning the internet is a lot more oppressive than banning TikTok and stuff like that. Also pro Palestine protests are allowed in every western country some have restrictions on them and some were banned than that uplifted

Are you trying to say the mastermind behind 9/11 who killed people in other countries and the UN along with China and Russia recognized as such isn’t actually a terrorist group? And yes some of that stuff is oppressive but the pro Palestine protests in western countries aren’t banned some are restricted but still allowed France tried to ban it but the courts ruled it as unconstitutional. But North Korea not allowing the internet and their people not to leave the country is oppressive and more so than what the rest is doing.
Lol
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is an email from Hilary Clinton as Secretary of state explicitly stating that the US intended to arm rebels overthrow Assad, purely to advance Israeli interests. This leak has been out for a decade, and the fact that people are still unaware of it is frightening and should frighten you as well. Right now Syria is ruled by a branch faction of the Al Qaeda who had been supported by the US allies throughout the civil war and not attacked. Now they are executing religious minorities everywhere. The US and EU are establishing friendly relations with the regime now. What does that tell you about news coverage on foreign affairs?

News flash, the US bans travellers on the basis of political memes in their social media; UK and Germany have arrested old retirees on "hate speech" charges because they called some politicians or policies stupid on the internet. All of these incidents are readily available information but somehow doesn't get publicized much. I wonder why?
Lol the toddler ain't going to read it because the material didn't come from the usual western gospel sources and the official books provided by his western professors!! And they say that the west have the monopoly in critical thinking? Lol this maroon is the proof that they never have one!!
 

PLAwatcher12

Junior Member
Registered Member
No it's not. An internet firewall is the same as banning TikTok. That's being selective on what part of the digital content your people can access. North Korea doesn't allow people to leave; America targets racial groups and has the police kill them, then the courts vindicate the officers. The latter is much more oppressive.

The president threatening to defund universities that allow pro-Palestinian protests is not oppressive? Picking out legal immigrants and residents and students and deporting them for supporting these protests is not oppressive? LOL

American presidents have been responsible for starting wars that have killed far more people. If any country should give up Bin Laden, the US should give up such a president when demanded.

Not banned... but restricted... so it's not oppressive? Reread that.

Trying to ban it is oppressive. Putting up barriers to those protests that are not present for Pro-Israeli protests is racist and oppressive. That's just France.

No, I think locking people up for t-shirt choice and banning free political choice is more oppressive. It's even worse what the West is doing because they pretend to be liberal when North Korea pretends to be nothing. The West is far worse and more oppressive.

Are you trying to act cute? LOL This is how my daughter talks when she's told she can do something when she's an adult.
I was given you the correct definition that’s not being cute. But why would I expect you to be accurate you never are. I already told you that stuff is. But I also said not allowing your citizens to leave your country and banning the internet is equally oppressive you don’t seem to think so though.
What did I say that was wrong?
Lol the toddler ain't going to read it because the material didn't come from the usual western gospel sources and the official books provided by his western professors!! And they say that the west have the monopoly in critical thinking? Lol this maroon is the proof that they never have one!!
I did read it actually but I did say before I could care less that Assad was overthrown he was a horrible leader who used chemical weapons on his civilians. Do you think Assad was a good leader or something? I also think I said that the US funded the SDF for overthrowing Assad too but they also funded them to help fight ISIS too.
 
Last edited:

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I was given you the correct definition that’s not being cute.
Children think they're not and that's cute. You ever heard the term "college kids?" They're all over 18, but their experience and knowledge are so little, they're just kids stepping into the real world... except you haven't graduated yet so you haven't even...
But why would I expect you to be accurate you never are.
Not according to everyone else on here.
I already told you that stuff is.
What stuff? Is what? This another dyslexia moment? It causes you to short-circuit mid-sentence?
But I also said not allowing your citizens to leave your country and banning the internet is equally oppressive you don’t seem to think so though.
No, you said that that's more oppressive and now you say equal. I said, no, police killing minorities for lighter offenses than they would on white people is the most oppressive. And that doesn't even mention the genocide in Gaza supported by the entire West. Or did your professor say that oppression doesn't count if it's overseas or committed onto those who are not your citizens?
What did I say that was wrong?
So many things. The general tone that Bin Laden should be given up because he caused deaths when American presidents have caused more. That North Korea is somehow especially evil because it's oppressive when you now admit that they are equally oppressive as the West. So what's your point? Whatever it was, it was wrong.
 
Last edited:
Top