Miscellaneous News

supercat

Colonel
Being a gay is one thing, being a rapist is another. We don't know what he did exactly.

Looks like someone didn't bother to zoom in on the screenshot.

View attachment 150392
I don't think Noah Smith knows the differences among Chinese Hanzi, Japanese Kanj, and Korean Hanja.

If they can do this to presumably Caucasian people from Five-Eye countries imagine what treatment colored folks get…
The tourists are Germans. US customs agents suspected that they wanted to be sex workers - never underestimate the stupidity of the employees of the Federal government.

The real reason Hegseth will be gone? It will be a godsend for China if the Trump regimes is trapped in a war in the west Asia.

LMAO tweet of the day: China reeks of desperation? Even Mexico won't make a deal with the Trump regime.
klUugVd.gif
 

zbb

Senior Member
Registered Member
I'm pretty sure the Romulans were Chinese and Klingons were Soviet though admittedly I don't watch much.

The Romulans had the totalitarian + cheater stereotype that you could see from a mile away and they were seen as implacable while Klingons were redeemable but crude.
Much of the history/politics of the Star Trek TOS (plus movies) universe corresponds to that of actual Earth history/politics. Here are the major correspondences that I see.
  • Vulcans and Romulans were originally the same people but split and became enemies due to differences in ideology, corresponding to the divide between Western and Eastern Europe.
  • Vulcans discovered Earth and guided Earth's development (Western European colonization of the Americas) and eventually formed the Federation (NATO) with Earth.
  • Romulans and Klingons were at first in an alliance opposed against the Federation (Sino-Soviet alliance), but the alliance broke apart (Sino-Soviet split) and fighting broke out on their borders (Sino-Soviet border clashes).
  • After the Romulan-Klingon split, the Klingons and the Federation reconciled and formed an alliance against the Romulans (Sino-US rapprochement).

Klingons had “Chinese” names. I think it was obvious hence why the Star Trek universe later stopped doing that.

That plus
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the original television series (TOS), Klingons were typically portrayed with bronze skin and facial hair suggestive of Asian people and possessed physical abilities similar to humans (in fact, Coon's only physical description of them in his "Errand of Mercy" script is "oriental" and "hard-faced").
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
The real reason Hegseth will be gone? It will be a godsend for China if the Trump regimes is trapped in a war in the west Asia.
Hegseth is one of the most appallingly pathetic worthless rats I've ever seen. You're literally a Christian jihadist and against war with Iran. Someone needs to deus vult his nuts off since they're not seeing any use anyway.
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member

Fireside Chat With Stephen Kotkin & US House Select Committee on China | Hoover Institution​



Participants:

1) Committee Chairman John Moolenaar, US Representative for Michigan's 2nd congressional district Ranking Member
2) Raja Krishnamoorthi, US Representative for Illinois's 8th congressional district.
3) Professor Kotkin, Kleinheinz Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution

Arguments/Statements by Kotkin and the respective translation:

Kotkin:

“We’re in a second Cold War, but it’s better than a hot war. We must compete with China while preserving our way of life.”

Translation:

We want unchallenged global dominance, but we can’t afford another Vietnam or Iraq. So we’ll use economic, technological, and ideological warfare to contain China and Russia without admitting we’re the aggressors.

Kotkin:

“China’s Leninist system is inherently repressive. It fears political reform and liberalization, which would be suicidal for the regime.”

Translation:

Don’t expect China to adopt Western liberal democracy. They remember what happened to Gorbachev and the USSR — and they’re not stupid enough to fall for our color revolution playbook.

Kotkin:

“China wants to restore its perceived rightful place in the world.”

Translation:

China dares to believe it should not be subordinate to the U.S.-led world order. This is unacceptable. Their ambitions threaten our monopoly on defining what’s “normal” globally.

Kotkin:

“We must share the world with China — but on our terms. The current status quo is a win for us.”

Translation:

China can exist, but only if it obeys the U.S.-dominated global architecture: dollar hegemony, NATO’s umbrella, Western tech rules, U.S.-controlled internet, and subservience in trade policy. If they try to challenge this, we bring the hammer.

Kotkin:

“Appeasement doesn’t work. Transformation through engagement (Pygmalion) doesn’t work. Cold War is our best option.”

Translation:

Forget trade peace and cooperation. We’re doubling down on containment, information warfare, sanctions, asset seizures, blockades, and militarized alliance-building — just like with the USSR. We want permanent tension without accountability.

Kotkin:

“The U.S. must remain who we are — a free and open society — and not become like them.”

Translation:

We’ll still censor dissenting voices, blacklist anti-war figures, imprison whistleblowers, and expand surveillance — but we’ll pretend we’re defending freedom while doing it.

Kotkin:

“Xi Jinping might roll the iron dice and invade Taiwan. We must raise the risk for him.”

Translation:

We want to make sure any move China makes toward Taiwan results in massive political and military cost — to deter reunification or integration by any means, even peaceful ones.

Kotkin:

“Taiwan is democratic, vibrant, and wants no part of the Communist regime.”

Translation:

Taiwan is our unsinkable aircraft carrier off China's coast. We’re arming it, funding it, and using it to provoke China — while pretending we’re just innocent protectors of freedom.

Kotkin:

“The status quo is our win. Don’t give China a pretext to act.”

Translation:

We want to keep Taiwan semi-detached — not independent, not fully reintegrated — so we can use it to needle China without provoking all-out war (yet). It’s a frozen conflict we manage for strategic leverage.

Kotkin:

“Winning means investing in ourselves, education, allies, and playing to our strengths.”

Translation:

Let’s retool our domestic economy just enough to maintain global primacy — but only if it supports our strategic goal of locking China and Russia out of global influence.


TL;DR Summary of Kotkin's points on China in the video:

A) China is a Leninist threat: He asserts that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cannot reform politically without collapsing—therefore, engagement with it will always fail.

B) The U.S. must remain the global hegemon: He believes the U.S. must preserve the status quo—meaning, its global preeminence and ideological model—against China’s ambitions.

C) The New Cold War is good: Kotkin frames the new U.S.-China rivalry as Cold War 2.0—and even calls Cold War an “achievement.” He warns against appeasement and believes strategic competition is the way to go.

D) Sacrifice is required: He says Americans must accept economic sacrifices (like higher prices or fewer apps) to preserve their system and “way of life.”

E) Taiwan is a red line: He insists that any Chinese move on Taiwan must be deterred not just militarily, but politically—by convincing China that its regime would fall if it acts.

F) We must never become like them: Kotkin draws heavily on Cold War-era George Kennan, warning that if America uses authoritarian tools to compete with authoritarian powers, it will lose by becoming what it opposes.

Disclaimer/Personal Opinion:

1) The Hoover Institution is a far-right/neofascist/neo-imperialist institution.

2) In his circles, Kotkin is a notorious neo-imperialist/American quasi neo-fascist ideologue. He repeats the same neocon/neolib tropes as the other far-right extremists/neofascist lunatics (e.g. Pompeo, McFaul, Pillsbury, Pottinger, Ward, Agent Chang, etc.).
 
Top