You mean liberal cucks? When have they ever been successful at anything other than waste USAID money?
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
You mean liberal cucks? When have they ever been successful at anything other than waste USAID money?
supercat
Major
Arrogant and ignorant Americans have no idea what an industrial juggernaut they are facing. China's current, peace time shipbuilding capability is greater than America's peak during WW2, not to mention that China can ramp up production significantly on a war footing.
Shameless.
LMAO tweet of the day:
China's Healthcare Security Administration Establishes New Pricing Items for Brain-Computer Interface Technologies
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, March 12 (Reporter Xu Penghang) – On March 12, it was learned from China's National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) that the authority recently issued the "Guidelines for Establishing Medical Service Pricing Items in Neurology (Trial)". Notably, the guidelines prospectively establish independent pricing items for brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies to accelerate the commercialization of these innovations.
In recent years, with advancements in artificial intelligence, neurobiology, and sensor technologies, brain-computer interface systems have seen rapid development. The creation of dedicated pricing items for BCI technologies aims to facilitate their clinical application and benefit patients.
The guidelines categorize BCI technologies into two main types: non-invasive and invasive. For non-invasive BCI systems requiring ongoing device adjustments, the document introduces a "Non-Invasive BCI Adaptation Fee" pricing item. For invasive BCIs, specialized pricing items including "Invasive BCI Implantation Fee" and "Invasive BCI Removal Fee" have been established.
The NHSA emphasized that this pricing framework prepares clear pathways for clinical implementation once BCI technologies mature. Following local implementation of these guidelines nationwide, standardized medical charging protocols for BCI applications will be established.
Additionally, the guidelines differentiate between "standard" and "complex" service tiers for high-value, high-risk procedures. Cases identified as complex through expert consensus will be directly classified under the "complex" pricing category.
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, March 12 (Reporter Xu Penghang) – On March 12, it was learned from China's National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) that the authority recently issued the "Guidelines for Establishing Medical Service Pricing Items in Neurology (Trial)". Notably, the guidelines prospectively establish independent pricing items for brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies to accelerate the commercialization of these innovations.
In recent years, with advancements in artificial intelligence, neurobiology, and sensor technologies, brain-computer interface systems have seen rapid development. The creation of dedicated pricing items for BCI technologies aims to facilitate their clinical application and benefit patients.
The guidelines categorize BCI technologies into two main types: non-invasive and invasive. For non-invasive BCI systems requiring ongoing device adjustments, the document introduces a "Non-Invasive BCI Adaptation Fee" pricing item. For invasive BCIs, specialized pricing items including "Invasive BCI Implantation Fee" and "Invasive BCI Removal Fee" have been established.
The NHSA emphasized that this pricing framework prepares clear pathways for clinical implementation once BCI technologies mature. Following local implementation of these guidelines nationwide, standardized medical charging protocols for BCI applications will be established.
Additionally, the guidelines differentiate between "standard" and "complex" service tiers for high-value, high-risk procedures. Cases identified as complex through expert consensus will be directly classified under the "complex" pricing category.
Yes exactly. The Americans think too highly of themselves. This idea that Nixon and Kissinger created the Sino-Soviet split is completely ignorant. America merely took advantage of the Sino-Soviet split. They didn't even know about the split until they heard about the border conflicts between the two. The Sino-Soviet split was created by both China and the Soviet Union, not Nixon.
The situation today is vastly different than the Sino-Soviet split. China and Russia are in the best state of relations in history. Trust and camaraderie is at an all time high. They have big plans to shape the world together. There is nothing that the US and the West can offer to Russia to walk away from that. There is also that baggage of centuries of invasion and betrayal. For China, there is nothing to gain, bringing up historical grievances with Russia at this point. In both countries, it's the voices of different shades of liberals who were the loudest in advocating another split. They do not see the world and history past beyond their own narrow interpretations. Their voices do not reflect the mainstream opinion in both countries, and their kind are unpopular in both nations. We must remember that liberals are almost always traitors to their own nation. Some may act patriotic when things are going well for them, but when things don't go so well, they will be the first to turn on their nation.
Last edited:
Nixon policy was in the first place at all enabled by Zhou Enlai policy - the doctrine that upheld that USSR revisionism was a more immediate and more advantegous to fight threat than Americanism. Without this idea (which in hindsight paid off BIG time by letting China get the best parts of the USSR) there would not have been a reapproachment.
China had a reason to "betray" the USSR, because the USSR was at that point a dead end. If USSR was a 10 in strength, Russia is a 7 or 8, but the fact that Russia is fully subordinate to China while USSR never would be means Russia is a far better deal for Beijing (and by extension, a better deal for the whole world that's interested in defending itself from Washington).
Today, Russia has no reason to betray China at all. China occupies the same position as US did in the 1980s, while US occupies the position of the USSR. You don't betray the guy with the upper hand to go to someone who can't even appoint half decent leadership. In the first place, China judged USSR incapable of carrying the torch precisely because they appointed idiots over and over. Which is what US today does, not China. So even if there existed a Russian Zhou Enlai today, he would not plot against China.
proelite
Junior Member
Konigstiger 3 LFG!
They also pretend to be Chinese girls. I forgot the name, but that infamous black white profile pic Chinese girl on twitter is actually an Indian guy.
Last edited:
It’s on purpose right?