Miscellaneous News

plawolf

Lieutenant General
First exit polls have been released. Anyone know the reasoning behind The Left's recent surge and fall in support for BSW ?

Projected result for ZDF

CDU/CSU 28.5%
AfD 20%
SPD 16.5%
Greens 12%
The Left 9%
BSW 5%
FDP 5%

(via ZDF)

___________________________________________

Projected result for ARD1

CDU/CSU 29%
AfD 19.5%
SPD 16%
Greens 13.5%
The Left 8.5%
FDP 4.9%
BSW 4.7%

CIA vote rigging machines go brrrrr.
 

proelite

Senior Member
Obviously China can just apply the same to Korean or Japan built ships when docking at Chinese ports and achieve 100% global shipbuilding monopoly, since China is a far bigger trading nation than the US>

But my gut feeling is there are even funnier things China can do.

One idea might be that China should ban companies that don't operate at least 30% of Chinese-built ships from accessing Chinese-owned ports.

Geopolitical distortion on world trade from the US should be countered by one from China. It should ideally be surgical, and proportional to negate the negative effects of the US's distortion without adding any of its own.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The European “Peace Keepers” has been relabelled as “Reassurance Forces” by the French and British.
this is extremely stupid. Historical precedent established in the aftermath of Desert Storm is that attacking forces enforcing a no fly zone is legal and does not trigger Article 5 of NATO.

The difference between Russia and Iraq is that Russia has Su-57s and S-400s which can snipe Eurofighters and F-16s with R-37s over Ukrainian territory, and Russia actually has nukes.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Why would Russia EVER agree to NATO troops inside Ukraine? That would constitute de facto NATO membership for Ukraine in all but name. This is utter stupidity on the part of France and UK.
they might just try to impose it like they did to Iraq. The difference is that they simply don't have the power to do so against Russia, but their hubris and delusion may blind them to that fact.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
this is extremely stupid. Historical precedent established in the aftermath of Desert Storm is that attacking forces enforcing a no fly zone is legal and does not trigger Article 5 of NATO.

The difference between Russia and Iraq is that Russia has Su-57s and S-400s which can snipe Eurofighters and F-16s with R-37s over Ukrainian territory, and Russia actually has nukes.
European countries have F-35 (*provided that US gives them activation codes...)
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
One idea might be that China should ban companies that don't operate at least 30% of Chinese-built ships from accessing Chinese-owned ports.

Geopolitical distortion on world trade from the US should be countered by one from China. It should ideally be surgical, and proportional to negate the negative effects of the US's distortion without adding any of its own.
That wouldn’t work. Companies will simply set up different companies. Need to charge $2M per non-China built ships to discourage shipping companies order ships outside of China.
 

jiajia99

Senior Member
Registered Member
European countries have F-35 (*provided that US gives them activation codes...)
How many of those do they have that actually works and also, since they are single engine aircraft with sheath that can be long picked up by modern radar, it’s almost as though they are setting themselves up for massive failures, something that I don’t mind seeing for these proud assholes
 

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

U.S. Pushes Kyiv to Kill Its U.N. Resolution Marking War’s Anniversary​

In a new rift, Washington and Kyiv pitch competing texts, with Europe backing Ukraine and the U.S. refusing to blame Russia for the war


Things are truly crazy now in the world, with developments, mainly from the US perspective that they want an end to this war in Europe.

Who can blame them. President Trump knows, that technically speaking, the United States did not actually start this war, but the United States is paying for it. So it just makes sense to stop.

Regardless of what we think of this United States decision, that to me is not even the crazy part.

The crazy part is the reactions of the Europeans. Like WTF?

It is that expression, do not bring a knife to a gunfire.

What exactly are the Europeans really saying today?

Make promises that everyone knows that they cannot deliver on, there is no bottom to how far this can collapse.

That is kind crazy if you ask me.

Perhaps the Americans saw through the EU bullshit and had enough. They sure are acting that way.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
this is extremely stupid. Historical precedent established in the aftermath of Desert Storm is that attacking forces enforcing a no fly zone is legal and does not trigger Article 5 of NATO.
they might just try to impose it like they did to Iraq. The difference is that they simply don't have the power to do so against Russia, but their hubris and delusion may blind them to that fact.

They are probably trying to repackage their old reported strategy of “Ukrainian” F-16s in Polish/Romania Airbases. Have the French and British take off from these.

Try provoking the Russians into responding and if the airbases get obliterated with oreshnik missiles. Attempt to trigger article 5. If they don’t then move in the tiny ground forces they cobbled together.
 
Top