I just feel that even acknowledging the Jai Hinds' existence is a waste of energy. There's more of them than any other group on english internet and none of them ever know when to shut up. If you want to piss into the ocean, feel free to do so.
And you're pissing into that same ocean too. With your emotional outbursts about the West, Israel, and China.
I have been consistent in my views as a militant communist. Liberation of the working class is global, not just in China. You can bet your ass that Mao wouldn't have taken the consistently hostile actions from the anglo bloc sitting down. He had the realization that unless the proletariat faced the bourgeoisie with a united front, the revolution would be pointless.
Read some theory and history. Maybe then you will learn that the PRC and the USSR are incomparable at a fundamental level. Even modern Russia, the oligarchy that it is, has very little in common with the PRC. Russia lacks the means while China lacks the drive.
Go read some actual history and study some real life application of communism. Your understanding of communism and modern Chinese history is so immature.
Mao acted with aggression for national security, not communism. China in the 1950s to the 1960s was not yet fully secured. Wars are blowing up around China's periphery. The borders with China's neighbours were not yet settled. Back then China didn't have comprehensive national power, both in the military and the economy. The nation was still in a vulnerable state. So the practical way to keep China together under threat from many directions was through measured aggression. Yes, Mao was a militant communist. Communism was a global movement at that time. Yet the story of global communism during the Cold War was far from a successful one. But at some point, Mao got carried away with his militant communism and made costly mistakes with the Chinese economy.
The CPC starting under Deng Xiaoping had admitted that you cannot create communism if the productive forces could not give the average citizens a decent life. They were right, the Soviets were excessively militant. They were spreading the gospel of communism, and providing military aid abroad. Despite the great Soviet military power, their citizens grew weary over a stagnant standard of living and started getting influenced by the temptations of the West. Then the rest is history. In trying to becoming the second global policeman for the communist world, the Soviets have stretched themselves thin to the point of collapse.
Why become yet another world policeman when you can become the world's factory? A shopkeeper will always win more friends than a policeman. You can never solve all of the world's problems, and it is frankly a thankless job. You help where you can and that's it. Don't try to get involved in the internal affairs of other nations. Or you'll just get dragged into other people's mess, while earning yourself more enemies. China's way of leadership today is to lead by example. No need to act like yet another imperial country, beating others into conforming to your communist ideology. If other countries don't want to learn from China's success, then that's their own problem.
