Miscellaneous News

SanWenYu

Major
Registered Member
It's not just incentives. Vietnam has a skilled labour shortage
This is something that have been conveniently ignored by those who hype about the "next China".

In the 80s when China was opening up, it had already got tens of millions of skilled workers in the SOEs. Its education system were also producing millions of highschoolers and hundreds of thousand college graduates a year.

These two groups became the backbone of China's work force from 80s to 90s. Then came the big expansion of college enrollments that have produced millions and millions of engineers with higher education in STEM every year for two decades. At the same time, the Chinese universities have been ascending rapidly in all kinds of STEM rankings around the world.

Tell me about the "next China" only when another country can do this at the same scale.

Not to mention that, the opportunity for workers of lower educations is about to diminish. In the 80s and 90s, one with a highschool degree could fit most positions in manufacturing. Now college graduates are barely enough to qualify for some of the highly automated assembly lines.

The "If China can, I can, too." meme came to my mind when I saw the headline of Vietnam to get an Intel semiconductor fab.
 

getready

Senior Member
So you are saying it is ok for SK to have a radar at 1200 KM range while Seoul to Beijing is only 950KM. And China tells SK not to do such a thing is bullying?

By your logic, if you live in an apartment, and the family live on top of you is very loud, and you tell them they should be quiet is bullying?

And so, China should sell weapons to NK and place them right next to Seoul, and SK should be quiet about it, saying anything is bullying.
He had stunningly bad takes on China Russia relationship and now the SK China issue. I've long given up.
 

getready

Senior Member
I have no problem with that. I said one needs to follow the laws of the land. Why would you think I have an issue with anti-discrimination in China or the US? It has nothing to do with international business and by conflating it with domestic law, you are quite wrong.

Once again, domestic laws do not govern international trade. Your analogy makes no sense. Any country can ban trade with any other country and it would be well within its rights to do so.

As I said, this likely falls into the gray zone because it damages the third party by adding extra restrictions post contract but it is not unlawful and on the flip side, it would be a bigger violation of someone's rights to force the US to sell or continue to sell its technology. The buyer and the seller have to both agree and when one doesn't, for any reason, there is no sale. Very basic and no amount of crying about bullying is gonna change that.

LOLOL I understand everything else here other than, "You know what makes Bruce Lee mad? You know how he felt about those racist people?" LOL That, as it pertains to international trade, I don't understand.

Definition of what? I'm facing an argument here that if I dislike a guy, I have to apparently keep spending money at his business or I'm somehow bullying him. That's no dictionary definition and anyone can come up with something more valid than that.
That was the same stupid argument by racist Australians when they blame China for economic coercion or bullying or whatever stupid term they call it after china stopped buying some of their products. This was after Aus gov kept shitting on China but expect China to take it all in the face and still buy their wines and lobsters.
 

supercat

Colonel
The US government is rather dysfunctional, because some of its members are sociopaths.

BREAKING: AL JAZEERA INVESTIGATION FINDS THAT THERE ARE NO HAMAS TUNNELS UNDER GAZA’S SHIEKH HAMAD HOSPITAL

Israeli forces claims debunked.

Some Western publications are published by sociopaths, and are published for sociopaths.

Ukraine is like a sinking ship. No matter how much money you send in, it will be siphoned off very quickly by those who are preparing to jump ship.
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
The US government is rather dysfunctional, because some of its members are sociopaths.



Some Western publications are published by sociopaths, and are published for sociopaths.

Ukraine is like a sinking ship. No matter how much money you send in, it will be siphoned off very quickly by those who are preparing to jump ship.
In regard to Ukraine, given the fact that Twitter is filled with fake news, this is the link to the interview:


and his plea for loans starts at 29:35
 

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
No, man. You're the one who's slower than cold molasses. Putting someone under duress is completely fine as long as you acted within your own rights and did not violate his. Being free of all duress is not a right. Being free from invasion is.

This argument is going in circles, mainly because you make up your own definitions.

It's basically impossible to argue in good faith when you make up your own definitions.

But for the record, what China did to South Korea is not bullying because it's self-defense against US-SK aggression. It has nothing to do with "China's rights" or whatever mental gymnastics you trying to justify with, and makes no sense whatsoever. It's self-defense against aggression, so it's not bullying. It has nothing to do with "Rights" or "Bullying=Invasion" non-sense.
 
Top