Miscellaneous News

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
With the usual caveats of veracity, I am ABSOLUTELY NOT OK with the trampling of constitutional rights under the guise of sanctions. None of these sanctions were voted by the parliaments and none are challangable in court. Even if these were actual laws, there is absolutely no point in the confiscation of private property on an ethnic basis. I really hate WW2 analogies but you know when this was also happening? Before the Holocaust.

Hahaha, this 'but 0.00000001% of our true power
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20230915-WA0002.jpg
    IMG-20230915-WA0002.jpg
    138.8 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_20230915_135528.jpg
    IMG_20230915_135528.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 36

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Greasy haired Argentinian continues to bark. Polls predict he will win the 2nd round convincingly.

“Not only am I not going to do business with China, I am not going to do business with any communists. I am a defender of freedom, peace and democracy. The communists don’t go there. The Chinese don’t go in there. Putin doesn’t go in there. Lula doesn’t go in there. We want to be the moral lighthouse of the continent. We want to be defenders of freedom, democracy, diversity. Of peace,” stated the national deputy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That is why admitting Argentina into BRICS was a dumb move. Should have waited for the outcome of the election to be determined.
 
Last edited:

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
My old comments about a possible Mexico expedition aged too well for my comfort. I saw a lot of Republican politicians writing about it and getting a lot of engagement. Big name media and politicians capitalized further on the topic and bingo. Half of the Americans now support such a thing in less than two years.


These cartels and even the Mexican state can not harm the US military meaningfully. The US got quite good at remaining in places despite armed hostility and dispatching small militaries.

Other than that this thing would be a dumpster fire. If the US actually wants to end the cartel problem, it has to really occupy the country. I mean soldiers on even obscure rural roads similar to post WW2 occupations. Just taking the cities and occasional patrols to the countryside is never enough for killing insurgencies. And Mexico is bigger than Afghanistan, both by population and landmass. Such an occupation would be horribly expensive, or just a bit less expensive and ineffective.

Moreover, these cartels have a lot of collaborators and presence in the US, including in the politics. It is how they can make billions in the first place. And a lot of latinos in the US still have ties to Mexico including family members. Riots, assassinations, infrastructure sabotages and attacks to police stations would go non-stop.

Not enough? These two countries have a long border. What does that mean? Refugees. Cartel members will cross as refugees and commit terrorist acts on top of usual problems associated with mass refugee flows.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Greasy haired Argentinian continues to bark. Polls predict he will win the 2nd round convincingly.

“Not only am I not going to do business with China, I am not going to do business with any communists. I am a defender of freedom, peace and democracy. The communists don’t go there. The Chinese don’t go in there. Putin doesn’t go in there. Lula doesn’t go in there. We want to be the moral lighthouse of the continent. We want to be defenders of freedom, democracy, diversity. Of peace,” stated the national deputy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That is why admitting Argentina into BRICS was a dumb move. Should have waited for the outcome of the election to be determined.
Statement straight out of the CIA's playbook

Another successful CIA operation
 
Top