Miscellaneous News

C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
The US's plans to resort to privateering may not be as far fetched as it sounds. They have already paid mercenaries to fight in Ukraine, and sent terrorists into Russia to kill civilians. They have sent HIMARS, ATACMS, and F-16s to Ukraine. Privateering is still somewhere below those level of provocations.

Who could they recruit? The same people that they've always recruited: mercenaries, terrorists, and other scumbags. If the US really wants to to do it, I suspect that they might set up an organization akin to their alphabet soup NGOs to carry out "international policing of the seas" where "volunteers" get to assist the "free-world" in upholding sanctions for the rules-based order. This NGO would train the privateers, and then issue the "letters of marque" to them to do their work. That "letter of marque" could be used to shield them from the coastguards and navies of the US and its puppet nations. The Operations Center for such an NGO would definitely not be based on US soil, but on a number of maritime puppet colonies, where US bases are present to assist them.

How would they fund and equip them? Obviously, the money should come mainly from the CIA, to maintain plausible deniability. The CIA might setup and fund some new privateers, or recruit existing pirates and upgrading them to modern privateers. The vessel of choice for modern pirates tend to favour small and fast vessels like speedboats. Hence they are easier to source than full size ships. For example, the Swedish CB90 fast-assault craft have been build in the hundreds, and 13 of them have been donated to Ukraine. So it wouldn't be too unrealistic now to get vessels like these on the black market. Another source could be from private boat makers around the world.

If the US really goes ahead with this privateer game, it'll open a can of worms for them. First, any additional form of piracy is gonna hurt the global maritime trade, thus putting even more pressure on the US economy. Second, Russia and China would have to actively secure sea-lanes, thus creating bigger naval presences in areas that they have traditionally been rarely present. They might even create new anti-piracy joint naval-taskforces with other affected nations. This also might push China to create a new fleet for areas like the Indian Ocean, which puts even more pressure on the US and India. Third, just like terrorists, privateers are not reliable. They could just as easily transform into actual pirates, targeting everyone's shipping with no exceptions. That's gonna become yet another mess for the world, left behind by the US.
Click to expand...
This definitely fits the habit, intent and behaviour of the Anglo American elites. Part of their fury about the destruction of Ukraine is that it also destroyed their design to have Azov as their “unofficial” nato army, not unlike Wagner being a mercenary NOC extension of the Russian state. If you remember those Azov personnel in HK during the 2019 riots, it’s clear that the anglos wanted to use this army against China. Similar ”irregulars” include Islamic State of Khorasan which is so obviously a CIA op much as Daesh was a mossad op.
Randomuser said:
These guys just cant help themselves. Everytime they think they are in the clear, another rape case pops up and lowers India's image once more.
Click to expand...
I’ve heard it said that India is the type of country where, if an Indian man comes across another Indian male raping a woman, he won’t try to stop it, but rather he will try to get secure his spot in the line to rape her as well.
 
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
The US's plans to resort to privateering may not be as far fetched as it sounds. They have already paid mercenaries to fight in Ukraine, and sent terrorists into Russia to kill civilians. They have sent HIMARS, ATACMS, and F-16s to Ukraine. Privateering is still somewhere below those level of provocations.

Who could they recruit? The same people that they've always recruited: mercenaries, terrorists, and other scumbags. If the US really wants to to do it, I suspect that they might set up an organization akin to their alphabet soup NGOs to carry out "international policing of the seas" where "volunteers" get to assist the "free-world" in upholding sanctions for the rules-based order. This NGO would train the privateers, and then issue the "letters of marque" to them to do their work. That "letter of marque" could be used to shield them from the coastguards and navies of the US and its puppet nations. The Operations Center for such an NGO would definitely not be based on US soil, but on a number of maritime puppet colonies, where US bases are present to assist them.

How would they fund and equip them? Obviously, the money should come mainly from the CIA, to maintain plausible deniability. The CIA might setup and fund some new privateers, or recruit existing pirates and upgrading them to modern privateers. The vessel of choice for modern pirates tend to favour small and fast vessels like speedboats. Hence they are easier to source than full size ships. For example, the Swedish CB90 fast-assault craft have been build in the hundreds, and 13 of them have been donated to Ukraine. So it wouldn't be too unrealistic now to get vessels like these on the black market. Another source could be from private boat makers around the world.

If the US really goes ahead with this privateer game, it'll open a can of worms for them. First, any additional form of piracy is gonna hurt the global maritime trade, thus putting even more pressure on the US economy. Second, Russia and China would have to actively secure sea-lanes, thus creating bigger naval presences in areas that they have traditionally been rarely present. They might even create new anti-piracy joint naval-taskforces with other affected nations. This also might push China to create a new fleet for areas like the Indian Ocean, which puts even more pressure on the US and India. Third, just like terrorists, privateers are not reliable. They could just as easily transform into actual pirates, targeting everyone's shipping with no exceptions. That's gonna become yet another mess for the world, left behind by the US.
Click to expand...
It means issuing a de facto challenge in shipbuilding against China. Both countries don't lack in volunteers that could conceivably man privateer/pirate hunting tourism fleets. The limiting factor is who can outfit their merchant shipping with larger and better semi-armed vessels.

I think it is in China's interest to goad for the militarization of transports, as it plays to China's strengths. US can maybe outfit with CB90 assault boats, while China can add whole modules to cargo shipping filled with search and hunt drones, jammers and war weapons. In addition to that also build their own, more affordable and advanced fast attack boats. The result will be gradually bullying the US out of sea lanes without having to use the PLA officially. Just progressively larger and better armed merchant escorts, along with Wagner/PMC type thugs on attack craft.

China also has better control over a potential maritime militia, as they're overall a country with much less extrajuridical armed organizations.
 
Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Arij Javaid said:
First mainstream Chinese game is around the corner called black myth wukong.

Let's see how it does. It could be a breakthrough for so many Chinese game developers.

China has made great mobile games but not many console and PC games. This could be a gamechanger.
Click to expand...
Its looking to become a huge success. The international gaming community are very impressed with the game, both in terms of aesthetics, and gameplay experience. One big indication for me of how well a game is made is that the developers took their sweet time to build and test the game before release. They did not do a Cyber Punk, releasing a premature game to ask for more funding.

Lol! That Sweet Baby Inc's woke rage sabotage attempt have backfired tremendously. Gamers around the world have blasted it. It has been proven yet again that woke was never a mainstream thing.
 
Last edited:
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Its looking to become a huge success. The international gaming community are very impressed with the game, both in terms of aesthetics, and gameplay experience. One big indication for me of how well a game is made is that the developers took their sweet time to build and test the game before release. They did not do a Cyber Punk, releasing a premature game to ask for more funding.

Lol! That Sweet Baby Inc's woke rage sabotage attempt have backfired tremendously. Gamers around have blasted it. It has been proven yet again that woke was never a mainstream thing.
Click to expand...
What is this sweet baby thing? I heard they tried to extort the Wukong developers but got told to fuck off. Are they US government controlled?
 
Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Index said:
What is this sweet baby thing? I heard they tried to extort the Wukong developers but got told to fuck off. Are they US government controlled?
Click to expand...
Sweet Baby Inc (SBI) is some kinda woke consultant studio that offers their "consultancy services" to game developers to fulfil those "woke quotas". I do not know if they're connected to the US government, but their behavior certainly hints of it. They do remind me of shady service firms like CrowdStrike.

SBI "offered" their consultancy services to Game Science for $7 million, the developer of Black Myth Wukong, but was declined. Not happy with being rejected, SBI threatened to smear Black Myth Wukong in the gaming world. Game Science ignored them, and SBI then launched a campaign accusing Game Science of sexism and lack of diversity. They used IGN in particular to smear the game, hoping it could create a boycott movement.

A few woke idiots supported SBI's and IGN's rebuke of Game Science, but the rest of the gaming world were outraged. The gaming community have all kinds of people, but wokeism is not mainstream. That outrage made alot of gamers, even Western ones throw their support behind Black Myth Wukong. So instead of achieving a boycott, SBI had essentially made the game even more popular, and revealed what a disgusting organization it actually is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top