Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
supercat
Major
I'm starting to wonder who will get to the moon first.
Unmistakable sign that China's economy is doing fine. Here is another one, which was authored by, who else? a female Chinese diaspora writer. I consider it a compliment to China's economic policymakers.
But, but, Palestine is flourishing like Urumqi, and Palestinians are enjoying their lives like Uyghurs! ...oh, never mind...
supercat
Major
Thoroughly brainwashed female Chinese diaspora "researcher" thinks that free speech = forcing someone speaks something she wants to hear.
The reality of the above talk show:
BTW, Victor Gao is a poor debator and a subpar representative for China's public relations.
New York Times just woke up to China's R&D prowess.
The reality of the above talk show:
BTW, Victor Gao is a poor debator and a subpar representative for China's public relations.
New York Times just woke up to China's R&D prowess.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
I think because Chinese place respecting authority as paramount, Chinese don't generally understand the concept of individual rights. Every anti-China Chinese basically is just following what the West tells them to do or what they think the West tells them to do because all they are to them is the "rightful" authority. Who is considered a rightful authority? Anyone who is in power. It's such a loose definition for Chinese because they will consider someone who's just older being an authority. That's because older people are more experience therefore wiser. Just because one is older, it doesn't mean they're wiser or they have good intentions. But there are plenty of Chinese who want no exceptions because another thing Chinese value is stability and avoiding chaos. If there's one exception, everyone is going to make an exception and thus the rule becomes meaningless and chaos will ensue. And Asians will look up to the US and the West as an authority. Why? Because they're in power. They're number one in the world. It doesn't matter how they got there and that's the trick isn't it?
Just look at Hong Kong where it was supposedly all about democracy and human rights. Those activists beat people for not agreeing with them. When interviewed by even Western journalists who questioned their tactics, they had no answer like they were confused and thought what they were doing was okay because the leaders of democracy and human rights, the US and the West, didn't say anything. If they understood what democracy and human rights are, they wouldn't do that. It's the opposite. They're doing it the Chinese way of how things work where all you're doing is what the authority tells you what to do. Then look at the riots in the UK just happening. It was posted in here of how Hong Kongers that escape to Great Britain were posting on social media being protective of white racist undemocratic actions. What's in common is that they're just pro-white (the authority) not pro-democracy and human rights. I bet right now if they were to read this, they wouldn't understand what I'm talking about because they don't have an understanding of democracy and human rights.
Ironic because all the anti-Chinese Chinese are just doing what Chinese do, warts and all. Here in the US, I encounter a lot Chinese who say they side with the US but they want Chinese to follow Chinese cultural ways. They don't like Americanized Chinese because American values make Chinese more think about themselves. Then why do they hate China? They don't want Chinese to be individuals. They want Chinese to value Chinese culture because they like all the cultural mechanism that give them control. What's the difference from a communist in Beijing that stifles dissent from a Hong Konger who beats people who don't agree with them? I don't see a difference and both of them think it's okay to do. What's the saying...? You lead by example. A lot of Westerners don't believe in democracy and human rights so it's expected that pro-West Chinese are going to follow because their authority ain't following it either.
Just look at Hong Kong where it was supposedly all about democracy and human rights. Those activists beat people for not agreeing with them. When interviewed by even Western journalists who questioned their tactics, they had no answer like they were confused and thought what they were doing was okay because the leaders of democracy and human rights, the US and the West, didn't say anything. If they understood what democracy and human rights are, they wouldn't do that. It's the opposite. They're doing it the Chinese way of how things work where all you're doing is what the authority tells you what to do. Then look at the riots in the UK just happening. It was posted in here of how Hong Kongers that escape to Great Britain were posting on social media being protective of white racist undemocratic actions. What's in common is that they're just pro-white (the authority) not pro-democracy and human rights. I bet right now if they were to read this, they wouldn't understand what I'm talking about because they don't have an understanding of democracy and human rights.
Ironic because all the anti-Chinese Chinese are just doing what Chinese do, warts and all. Here in the US, I encounter a lot Chinese who say they side with the US but they want Chinese to follow Chinese cultural ways. They don't like Americanized Chinese because American values make Chinese more think about themselves. Then why do they hate China? They don't want Chinese to be individuals. They want Chinese to value Chinese culture because they like all the cultural mechanism that give them control. What's the difference from a communist in Beijing that stifles dissent from a Hong Konger who beats people who don't agree with them? I don't see a difference and both of them think it's okay to do. What's the saying...? You lead by example. A lot of Westerners don't believe in democracy and human rights so it's expected that pro-West Chinese are going to follow because their authority ain't following it either.
It is focused on front line because it does not want to focus on cities as It will not deliberately sent extra 20m white people to Europe both for its own interests and meet the Arabic Standards.
where you get idea that airpower cannot take modern air defended and fortified troops?. you always ignore the constraints of Arabic standards in Ukraine conflict that i keep mentioning. Both Israel and Saudi lacks both the quantity and quality of weopons to bury there much smaller rivals. Russia has deep penetrators bombs/missiles since Russia is foremost Industrial power second to none. Its Tu-160M not participating. it choose not produce more as preservation of Culture is far more important than producing more industrial goods. why do you think Putin said Russian family need to have 8 or more children because he has that hidden data and also he want to see family structure that is closer to Gulf Monarchies. for that women role has to be curtailed in sophisticated way. with out it that Soviet 1988 olympics they got 55 Gold including team matches like Football (defeating both Argentina and Brazil), Basketball, Volley ball. Russia is way way wealthy and sophisticated country than Soviet Union.
The missile system was not operational in 2018 but Saudi media called it a Strategic Weopon. thats the insight you get following Arab media.
Doesn’t this just show that their President and politicians aren’t the true master of the country? Remind me who it is that you can’t criticize or protest without getting arrested and/or fired from your job again?
Anyone who still thinks 69 landing actually happened, themselves got mooned
Soon more time will have passed since initial moon landing than that from Wright brothers flying bicycle to One small step.... This is as big of a joke as saying after the Mayflower made it to the new world, but then for the next 500 years no one made another successful sailing again and the closest anyone ever got since then was two folks in a sailboat trapped in the English channel....
She can't possibly say that yes Public hates me and wanted literally kill me if I stayed so I fled. In order to save face she has to blame nefarious conspiracy plots. US is the convinent scapegoat. It was US that literally protected her 15 year rule from the beginning. When Myanmar or Venezuela has fake elections, US and the west spends no time to sanction the government. US never sanctioned Hasina for all the repression and killings she has done over the years.
Bangladesh because of its Muslim majority surrounded by Hindutva dominated India is pretty much destined to be an ally of China against India. Indians openly talk about Akhand Bharat and taking over all the parts of former British India.
US on the other hand doesn't a pro-China Bangladesh. So, it chose to support the political party that is extremely pro India. Why would US want that party to get out of power?
With her gone, both US and India are not happy. Cause sooner or later the interim govt will be gone to be replaced by a pro-China and pro-Pakistan govt. That will be the end of Indian influence in Bangladesh.
The
*Hat tip to @Chevalier
I don't think this has been posted yet. Victor Gao was interviewed by Medhi Hasan and it didn't go very well.
The clip above with the Hong Konger asking the silly Winnie the Pooh question is taken from it:
There was a Tibetan activist claiming his mother is detained and a Uyghur activist claiming her brother was detained. Victor insisted they affirm Chinese sovereignty which is fine but he could have been clear that there is no arbitrary detention in China barring occasional legal mistakes as in any jurisdiction.
When talking about Taiwan he was adamant that the opinion of the people there is not the basis of sovereignty which is fine but I would stress that the Taiwan separatism is foreign instead.
The clip above with the Hong Konger asking the silly Winnie the Pooh question is taken from it:
There was a Tibetan activist claiming his mother is detained and a Uyghur activist claiming her brother was detained. Victor insisted they affirm Chinese sovereignty which is fine but he could have been clear that there is no arbitrary detention in China barring occasional legal mistakes as in any jurisdiction.
When talking about Taiwan he was adamant that the opinion of the people there is not the basis of sovereignty which is fine but I would stress that the Taiwan separatism is foreign instead.