Miscellaneous News

daifo

daifo

Major
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
Trump has picked his VP. Said person will be at the presidential debate on June 27. They probably won’t announce it until then.

So who do we think it is? Tom Cotton?
Click to expand...

It won't be a black or brown person for sure considering that half his base are likely at least closet racist. I don't think it will be someone that has been too loud who would take the limelight off Trump or be a potential threat to his sons/daughter running. So would be unlikely Cotton or Rubio or JD Vance type. Won't be someone that once challenge him either. So likely the most potential are "nobodies" on the list but looks professional without being odd(Pence). I'd pick someone like North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum from the potentials that been mention
 
AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

For example, we asked citizens whether they thought that “the only way our country can solve its current problems is by supporting tough leaders who will crack down on those who undermine American values.”
Click to expand...

One man's hero is another man's villain but how can one see who is universally evil to all? Evil can have two contradictory thoughts at a single time. Crack down on those who they see as undermining American values? The thing is a lot of people hide behind the general meaning of words. It's like how many American will cry, "freedom" because they want the positive prejudice that they believe in freedom for all which says they know what it means but they're only talking about it for themselves. So what are "American values" if not what people generally think what it means? They're for American values but they're going to violate "American values" in order to save and defend it. If all it takes to believe in freedom is just believing it for yourself and for anyone who think likes you, you can make an argument Hitler was a freedom fighter because who's going to argue that he wasn't for freedom for himself? So why is someone evil in nature if they contradict themselves at a single moment? It's because to have it both ways is about selfishness and at the heart of evil is all about selfishness. I come across Republicans who say they're against racism but they want the benefits of racism. They want to generalize about people and acts committed based on generalizations. Shouldn't crimes be determined by the acts one individual commits? Not to them because they determine crimes by two other factors. Who commits the act and who's the victim of that act? Both are based on the prejudicial generalizations of people. So what does it say when they want to defend American values by violating American values...? And they've given themselves the only right to do that.
 
P

pmc

Major
Registered Member
coolgod said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804859213216194670

Yedioth Ahronoth Hebrew news:
India has provided Israel with artillery shells, light weapons, and drones since the beginning of the war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Indian media also revealed, last February, for the first time, that India had provided Israel with advanced “Hermes 900” drones, which are manufactured in Hyderabad.

India is definitely the worst offender in BRICS+.
Click to expand...
i am not sure about the validity of the report and but what ever India does in that regions have the support.
there is enormous interaction between Gulf Emirates and India. BRICS+ has many members.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

'Tel Aviv' written on Ethiopian plane causes upset in Lebanon​

Click to expand...
 
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Randomuser said:
Btw China isn't a nice country like some people claim. It aims to be an effective AND realistic country. It can make tough decisions very easily. It's just right now is the time to be restrained so it doesn't do as much.
Click to expand...

Added for more accuracy.

Here's one other POV on the matter which I agree with:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804854075416269210
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804855962442027373

Apart from the Philippines, China also has disputes over islands and shoals in the SCS with Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei, alongside disputes over a patch of sea north of Natuna with Indonesia. So why is the Philippines the only country out of those listed having a massive fuss with China?

Manila should reflect on that.

Had China been as aggressive as what those Westoids and the ASEAN Jai Hinds are claiming (and what some people here in this forum are actually advocating for in the SCS Thread, I won't name them), then much of ASEAN would've been on fire long ago.
 
Last edited:
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
Added for more accuracy.

Here's one other POV on the matter which I agree with:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804854075416269210
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804855962442027373

Apart from the Philippines, China also has disputes over islands and shoals in the SCS with Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei, alongside disputes over a patch of sea north of Natuna with Indonesia. So why is the Philippines the only country out of those listed having a massive fuss with China?

Manila should reflect on that.

Had China been as aggressive as what those Westoids and the ASEAN Jai Hinds are claiming (and what some people here in this forum are actually advocating for in the SCS Thread, I won't name them), then much of ASEAN would've been on fire long ago.
Click to expand...
Problems between Asian nations should be handled in house between Asian nations, as Wang Yi said, the West doesn't care what Asian you are because you're not white. Philippines introducing the Anglo Americans into this issue is like a wayward daughter introducing a loser laowai Sexpat into the family, who disrespects your parents, steals from you and threatens your nieces and nephews if they don't call him master.
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

assuming the weaponised autism of western journalists, I would say that those astronauts are human sacrifice for the western elites who drink baby blood for adrenochrome as their history dictates, because their Christian religion calls for cannibalism and drinking the blood in holy communion .

I would also say that the collapse of Boeing products is a sign of the failure of western capitalism and the failed philosophy of free market liberalism and that white European Anglo Americans simply cannot innovate, it isn’t in their culture and genetically they never experienced evolutionary pressure to innovate, they could onky steal and copy. Even their entire “western civilisation” is derivative of surrounding ancient Egyptian and Arab cultures.
 
coolgod

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Three Columbia Deans Placed on Leave Pending Investigation​

Three of the Columbia University deans caught
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
during a May 31 panel on anti-Semitism have been placed on leave as the university investigates the incident, a spokesman for the school said Thursday.
Click to expand...
The three deans placed on leave, Susan Chang-Kim, Matthew Patashnick, and Cristen Kromm, were captured—along with Sorett—exchanging derisive and anti-Semitic text messages. The texts included Kromm's use of vomit emojis to refer to a Columbia University rabbi's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
sounding the alarm about the eruption of anti-Semitism on campus and Patashnick's accusation that one of the panelists, Columbia Hillel director Brian Cohen, was taking "full advantage of this moment" for its "fundraising potential."
Click to expand...
1719204814744.png
1719204833156.jpeg

Now you know why Netflix's Three Body Problem had to emphasize the cultural revolution, to make the readers feel right at home.
 
siegecrossbow

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
AssassinsMace said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



One man's hero is another man's villain but how can one see who is universally evil to all? Evil can have two contradictory thoughts at a single time. Crack down on those who they see as undermining American values? The thing is a lot of people hide behind the general meaning of words. It's like how many American will cry, "freedom" because they want the positive prejudice that they believe in freedom for all which says they know what it means but they're only talking about it for themselves. So what are "American values" if not what people generally think what it means? They're for American values but they're going to violate "American values" in order to save and defend it. If all it takes to believe in freedom is just believing it for yourself and for anyone who think likes you, you can make an argument Hitler was a freedom fighter because who's going to argue that he wasn't for freedom for himself? So why is someone evil in nature if they contradict themselves at a single moment? It's because to have it both ways is about selfishness and at the heart of evil is all about selfishness. I come across Republicans who say they're against racism but they want the benefits of racism. They want to generalize about people and acts committed based on generalizations. Shouldn't crimes be determined by the acts one individual commits? Not to them because they determine crimes by two other factors. Who commits the act and who's the victim of that act? Both are based on the prejudicial generalizations of people. So what does it say when they want to defend American values by violating American values...? And they've given themselves the only right to do that.
Click to expand...

Jai America!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More than the US fears a Russia/North Korean alliance...? Yes ignore the white elephant in room. The US also claims that China fears Western punishment if they help Russia in Ukraine so that's why they haven't helped Russia directly as much as the West is for Ukraine.. If that's true, why would China want to stop North Korea from doing it? Afterall the West says stopping Russia also means stopping China. Also they say if the West and Ukraine lose this war, China becomes the number one superpower in the world. So why would China want to stop a Russia/North Korean alliance?

Why wouldn't the US want this Russian/North Korean alliance to happen? What I've read from their propaganda is North Korean artillery ammunition are so bad quality that they're exploding in Russian howitzers when fired. Isn't North Korea actually helping the West destroy Russian artillery? Maybe they'll spin it as North Korea is actually secretly helping the US because they want to be loved by Americans like the rest of the world does?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top