Miscellaneous News

I

Index

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Its simple, most Chinese aren't usually largely built. Bruce Lee for example, is not a large dude, but everybody knows what he can do. Indian male troublemakers like to bully, and bullies like to pick on small targets, i.e.: smaller-sized men, or women. The Jai Hinds like to make fun of the "small-Chinese", but the ironic thing is that the majority of Indian men are also built around the same size. Its only the Punjabs that are tended to be bigger-built, and the Indian Army like to send their Punjabi Jawans as brawlers against PLA soldiers. It looks better for the cameras, but they also got their asses kicked.

The Chinese are also one of the most picked-on race by racists around the world. And Indians like to gang up on "vulnerable" targets to get some of the bully action. Today its the Chinese, yesterday it was the Muslims. That is why the Jai Hinds deserve no respect.


Depending on the severity. Normally its fines, warnings, and a booking if its nothing too serious, and both parties can settle their disputes, like in this case. If there are broken bones, serious injuries, or death, then there could be jail time and whipping by the rattan stick.

I think the same laws applies to foreigners. Naturally, any foreigner vs local fights is gonna get more attention and hatred. So the public might demand for harsher punishments. Unless the foreigner has some important contacts who might be able to bail them out. The law is easy to bend in Malaysia with money and connections.
Click to expand...
Tbh I think it just has to do with Indians getting confidence from numbers. Bruce Lee and some of the more shrunken grandmas are kinda the exception to the rule, Hindus, south east asians and aboriginals are the smallest size human phenotypes on average, Chinese are pretty middle of the road, around the size of your average middle Easterner, anglo or south European, especially what with most being more than well fed.

India probably sends larger or much larger individual squads, it's a big prestige thing for them and they're not exactly well equipped. Which doesn't help them when smaller PLA groups have crowd control weapons and can also call in reinforcements by atv/heli etc. But in some cases like Galwan, it tempts the Indians to attack.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Laviduce said:

China-Russia relationship is concerning, says NATO secretary-general - BBC News​



Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg warned China that it must stop financially supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The BBC’s Sumi Somaskanda interviewed Stoltenberg about international politics related to Russia’s war in Ukraine. In a wide-ranging interview, the Secretary General clarified that NATO’s position with regards to nuclear deterrence remains unchanged, following his comments to the Telegraph about the nuclear threat from an alliance of North Korea, Russia and China. Mr Stoltenberg also suggested a possible “economic cost” should be imposed on China should it continue to support Russia’s war in Ukraine. He also spoke about the impact of US politics on support for Ukraine.

Jens "Quisling" Stoltenberg: "China is trying to have it both ways...at some stage we should consider some kind of economic cost if China doesn't change their behavior..."

Disclaimer:

1) The BBC has been caught several times spreading propaganda and misinformation concerning geopolitical affairs.
2) Jens "Quisling" Stoltenberg is a de-facto US agent (unregistered foreign agent) in Europe. He does not reflect or represent the interests of the European people. He does the bidding of his masters in Washington DC.
3) Jens Stoltenberg's bosses in Washington DC installed an Anti-Russian regime in Kiev in 2014. His Washington DC bosses have propped up an Anti-Russian regime since then.
4) The Washington Pact (also know as NATO in the West) is a US tool to 1) control its satellite/vassal states in Europe and 2) Threaten the security of the Russian Federation in Europe 3) Used as a tool to support and preserve global hegemony of the neocon/neolib US.

Personal View:

Now this outrageous lying hypocrite (lunatic?) Stoltenberg is saying that China has the audacity to support Russia in face of US hybrid warfare in Ukraine. China is fully aware that they will be the next target if Russia were to fall to US aggression in Europe. The neocon/neolib US is trying to have it both ways by saying "1) its totally OK if we topple governments left and right" and "2) You better not respond to our flagrant breeches of international law (even if it is directly aimed against you) or else!!!" This insane and insidious behavior should no longer be tolerated by the international community (the real one). This destructive supremacist behavior has no place in the 21st century.
Click to expand...
Weird that they never warn India about their relation with Moscow, only China.

1718714923492.png

Looks like is like NATO that want to have it both ways they declared China as their enemy but they also want China to help them with their enemy.

1718715654517.png
 
L

LuzinskiJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Its simple, most Chinese aren't usually largely built
Click to expand...
That was my impression up until a decade ago. I think Chinese are getting bigger overall population wise due to better nutrition and better prenatal health of the mothers. There is also a large north south divide (based on staple food source whether it is wheat or rice) in that Northern Chinese tend to be taller, but we don't see too many of them outside of China because it is the Southern Chinese that emigrate out, and they tend to be smaller (the previous generations were anyways). But overall, my impression is that Chinese people are getting taller.
 
plawolf

plawolf

Lieutenant General
tokenanalyst said:
Weird that they never warn India about their relation with Moscow, only China.

View attachment 131234

Looks like is like NATO that want to have it both ways they declared China as their enemy but they also want China to help them with their enemy.

View attachment 131235
Click to expand...

NATO has been the bullyboy for so long it no longer understands what reasonableness actually means. Because they honestly think reasonable is utter subservience to whatever the hell their latest whims are, and anything less is being actively hostile. That’s the root reason why there is a war in Ukraine, because they just cannot help themselves from wanting to continue to push Russia’s buttons just because Russia isn’t being a literal slave state to them.
 
C

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
plawolf said:
NATO has been the bullyboy for so long it no longer understands what reasonableness actually means. Because they honestly think reasonable is utter subservience to whatever the hell their latest whims are, and anything less is being actively hostile. That’s the root reason why there is a war in Ukraine, because they just cannot help themselves from wanting to continue to push Russia’s buttons just because Russia isn’t being a literal slave state to them.
Click to expand...
There cannot be peace in Eurasia until they are dismantled.
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
plawolf said:
NATO has been the bullyboy for so long it no longer understands what reasonableness actually means. Because they honestly think reasonable is utter subservience to whatever the hell their latest whims are, and anything less is being actively hostile. That’s the root reason why there is a war in Ukraine, because they just cannot help themselves from wanting to continue to push Russia’s buttons just because Russia isn’t being a literal slave state to them.
Click to expand...
That’s typical American MO. It goes something like this:
1) US creates a problem, eg tensions with North Korea
2) US tries to extricate itself from problem without losing face, fails.
3) US tries to get China to fix the problem which in no way relates to China
4) when China wants no part of it, US threatens China to fix the problem the U.S. caused, thereby creating another copy of the problem leading us back to 1).

you must remember that western leaders never experienced the ramifications of their actions, they believe in concepts like whipping boys and scapegoats and you see their members getting promoted after creating a mess eg von der leyen.

eg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



1718722656348.png

jealous Anglo westerners try to tell themselves that no, Russian women don’t really like Chinese men!! its all bots and AI!!

It is an insane level of weird how committed anglos are when it comes to the obsessive need to sexually dominate China and emasculate Chinese men. I find it incredibly amusing considering the tastes of Anglo elites tends towards little boys and yet they are rabid when a pristine aryan blonde would prefer Chang over the men who have sex with men calibre of the anglosphere.
 
Last edited:
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
That’s typical American MO. It goes something like this:
1) US creates a problem, eg tensions with North Korea
2) US tries to extricate itself from problem without losing face, fails.
3) US tries to get China to fix the problem which in no way relates to China
4) when China wants no part of it, US threatens China to fix the problem the U.S. caused, thereby creating another copy of the problem leading us back to 1).

you must remember that western leaders never experienced the ramifications of their actions, they believe in concepts like whipping boys and scapegoats and you see their members getting promoted after creating a mess eg von der leyen.

eg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



View attachment 131247

jealous Anglo westerners try to tell themselves that no, Russian women don’t really like Chinese men!! its all bots and AI!!

It is an insane level of weird how committed anglos are when it comes to the obsessive need to sexually dominate China and emasculate Chinese men. I find it incredibly amusing considering the tastes of Anglo elites tends towards little boys and yet they are rabid when a pristine aryan blonde would prefer Chang over the men who have sex with men calibre of the anglosphere.
Click to expand...
Like I said bro being Chinese is beautiful, I regret I was born earlier, if I was born today, I may have ate a lot of white leghorn everyday from breakfast, lunch and dinner. ;)
 
T

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
View attachment 131247

jealous Anglo westerners try to tell themselves that no, Russian women don’t really like Chinese men!! its all bots and AI!!

It is an insane level of weird how committed anglos are when it comes to the obsessive need to sexually dominate China and emasculate Chinese men. I find it incredibly amusing considering the tastes of Anglo elites tends towards little boys and yet they are rabid when a pristine aryan blonde would prefer Chang over the men who have sex with men calibre of the anglosphere.
Click to expand...
From the anglo point of view, the natural order of things inevitably ends with East Asians superseding the whites, due to being more numerous, intelligent and harder working. This pathological insecurity explains every discriminatory policy to every rumour / slander that has been disseminated against Asians.
The events of the last 10 years and the projected future trend is a realization of their worst nightmare, which is loss of dominance, loss of competitiveness, and (hilariously) the loss of "their" women, hence the desperation.
 
T

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
ansy1968 said:
Like I said bro being Chinese is beautiful, I regret I was born earlier, if I was born today, I may have ate a lot of white leghorn everyday from breakfast, lunch and dinner. ;)
Click to expand...
My man, don't allow age to become a barrier - I just came across a 小红书 profile of a single Chinese guy (age 40's to 50's) who found an 18 year old girlfriend from Serbia (would rate at almost supermodel level), now living together happily and touring Thailand... where there is a will there is a way :cool:
 
I

Index

Junior Member
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
That’s typical American MO. It goes something like this:
1) US creates a problem, eg tensions with North Korea
2) US tries to extricate itself from problem without losing face, fails.
3) US tries to get China to fix the problem which in no way relates to China
4) when China wants no part of it, US threatens China to fix the problem the U.S. caused, thereby creating another copy of the problem leading us back to 1).

you must remember that western leaders never experienced the ramifications of their actions, they believe in concepts like whipping boys and scapegoats and you see their members getting promoted after creating a mess eg von der leyen.

eg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



View attachment 131247

jealous Anglo westerners try to tell themselves that no, Russian women don’t really like Chinese men!! its all bots and AI!!

It is an insane level of weird how committed anglos are when it comes to the obsessive need to sexually dominate China and emasculate Chinese men. I find it incredibly amusing considering the tastes of Anglo elites tends towards little boys and yet they are rabid when a pristine aryan blonde would prefer Chang over the men who have sex with men calibre of the anglosphere.
Click to expand...
Perhaps clarifying that the women are older than 18 and do not have male genitalia will be sufficient to deter angloid interest...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top