I don't like Modi, but I dont think him losing is a good sign. Hopefully he stays as minority leader.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Nah, they should retain it.
Given how there're still considerable amount of infestation by Western-bootlicking 殖人s and about-to-be 润人s in mainland China and Hong Kong, it is actually refreshing and welcoming that this particular scene has given a big slap right in the faces of these people.
Of course, even better would be instead of changing, they should add another journalist character of East Asian origin (Japan or South Korea) and have that ultranationalist soldier asking his/her origin and then just mutter "I dunno, you look from China enough" before also firing at him/her.
(Wang Yi's gotta keep racking up those GodFather points!)
Last edited:
The only chance India has to ever become like China is with Chinese investment, goodwill and an attitude of sensible humility as was the case under Manmohan Singh and previous indian administrations. Modi brings the ugly indian to the fore, the loquacious, boastful, cowardly, lying, backstabbing face of india in driving away much needed FDI. In fact, the only FDI there is into India appears to be into its share market to harvest indian savings.
So yes, Modi and hindutva staying in india is good for overall collective security as it marginalises india and allows its neighbours to draw closer to China.
The anglos, meaning the USG and the Australian Government with their White Australia Policy never learnt from their history because they didn't suffer to learn the lessons, as Chinese had to endure and suffer the century of humiliation to learn the lesson that national security and hard power is paramount. The anglos are sorely in need of the lesson that white supremacy is a myth that often leads to disaster. The Germans learnt that lesson, but are currently being led astray by Anglos who believe they successfully got away with exterminating native americans and the offshoot of that crime is that ashkenazi jews believe they can get away with exterminating Palestineans.
Well if you have been following the Ukraine War, the Anglo plan has always been to supply weapons to some dumb idiots who were willing to do the dirty work for them. The Taiwan and PH plan should also be similar. If there is a hot war between the PH and China. I anticipate that the Anglos, along with Japan, SK, India, and the DPP separatists in Taiwan might line up to "donate" weapons and cash to the PH to fight China. They wish to bleed the PLAN in anyway possible with their weapons in Filipino hands. Very likely, they might send in mercenaries, advisers, volunteers, and even rebadge their servicemen into Filipino uniforms to do the more sophisticated fighting. They definitely desire an opportunity to see their munitions, missiles and drones being used to hurt PLAN vessels, aircraft and manpower outside of a direct war with China.
That should be the cynical Anglo plan. But how it'll fare out in reality will be very different from Ukraine. Its primarily naval warfare instead of land warfare, the Filipinos are not Ukrainians, ASEAN is not NATO, and China is not Russia. This time, any blowback to the Anglos will really hurt.
Last edited:
Ngl I wish the writer took it further and had the guy say “Taiwan” instead of HK.
I feel the question is not whether the US will use the Philippines to generate conflict, because they 100% will try. But it's whether conflict with the Philippines will have as big of a "negative" impact as Ukraine did on Russia.
I put negative in quote because Russia has actually done a lot better economically during a war then anyone expected, and has actually become more resilient. But initially there were still negating shocks.
I wonder what negative shocks there would be for china.
Indian politics seems like a cluster fuck. BJP (Modi) needs 272 seats but they only won 240 seats however they are part of a NDA coalition with 40 other parties (16 has seats). Meanwhile, the opposition has won 234 seats but is also a coalition with 40 other parties (20 has seats) called INDIA. Except their top party won 99 seats with 135 seats divided among 20 parties.
