Ukraine does not need all of its territory, NYT says.
It is an opinion piece though. That said I do think the collective West is looking to bail on Ukraine. Israel takes precedence of course.
Ukraine does not need all of its territory, NYT says.
Look at these Han Chinese nationalists marching in 夏洛茨维尔, a traditional center of Han Chinese culture:
How true is this article? Anyone following Chinese internet? Does this kind of people really exist who want to takeover rocky mountains? I find it hard to believe.
I actually see the opposite in places like Chinese language reddit where there are many reverse anti-China nationalists who want to breakup China into pieces.
This what former Israeli PM predicted who saved Zelenski and direct conflict to non Jewish part. Zelenski will get visual victories to make him effective for Europe. so i guess Putin trust worthy when deals with Mideast but not when dealing with EuropeUkraine does not need all of its territory, NYT says.
“Things are looking bad on the ground right now, but it’s important to understand that if world leaders don’t act quickly, it can get much worse,” he said at Tel Aviv’s CyberTech conference. “I’m talking about untold loss of life, total destruction of Ukraine. Millions of refugees. And it’s not too late.” It’s the responsibility of the major players in the world to get the two sides out of the battlefield and on to the negotiation table,” he added.
yeah most of the "Chinese Nationalists" in the west are straight up whiteLook at these Han Chinese nationalists marching in 夏洛茨维尔, a traditional center of Han Chinese culture:
Ukraine does not need all of its territory, NYT says.
Ceasefire is pointless for Russia. The boat has sailed long ago. Ceasefire made most sense early on when Russia did not suffer huge cost, or year 1 when Russia had insufficient manpower. Now all the problems are fixed.It probably makes sense for Russia to stop the fighting now with a ceasefire deal, rebuild for a couple of years and then start again to gain an even bigger chunk of Ukraine. For Ukraine and the west also, it might make sense to stop now, rebuild and try again to defeat Russia with a much bigger or more powerful force in the future.
But its not certain who will prevail in the next round. Will Russia succeed in its rebuilding efforts and completely crush Ukraine the next round. Or will Ukraine and the west succeed and Utterly defeat Russia.
Because of this uncertainty, they will probably just keep fighting until both parties are fully exhausted, and stopping becomes more lucrative than the uncertainty of round 2.
One thing is for sure, Russia will not stop trying to reunite all the east slavic lands and try to recapture as much of former Soviet Union as possible. They will keep trying, or collapse in the process.
It probably makes sense for Russia to stop the fighting now with a ceasefire deal, rebuild for a couple of years and then start again to gain an even bigger chunk of Ukraine. For Ukraine and the west also, it might make sense to stop now, rebuild and try again to defeat Russia with a much bigger or more powerful force in the future.
Salaries and pensions may be delayed in Ukraine without Western aid: Cabinet of Ministers sets deadline
Ukraine may face delays in the payment of salaries and pensions for almost 12 million people if the West does not provide financial assistance in early 2024.
Why would it make sense for Russia? They have the upper hand and have massively ramped up their military industrial production. Meanwhile, Ukraine is facing increasing manpower, munitions, weapons, and financial problems. The opportunity to negotiate a ceasefire was last year and that is gone. The Russian government and officials have already said any ceasefire negotiations is unacceptable over the last couple months.