Miscellaneous News

KYli

Brigadier
No, it is not really India that is the main issue
This is:


The reality is that 5G is not a good consumer selling point. It is not consistently significantly faster than 4G LTE. As a result, customers are not rushing to change phones for it. 4G is basically as fast as people need it unless they are downloading 4K HDR videos to their phone.

As I understand (in my limited technical capacity), a lot of the work for 5G was on enhancing latency and connection quality/consistency. This would enhance a lot of IoT, remote applications, or future V2X applications, but less important for an average consumer.

Of course, that is precisely why China chose to quickly implement 5G because it believes it can provide an industrial advantage.
The issue is more due to the fact that the Western countries auction airwaves to bring in tens of billions in revenue. Just for US, companies spent over 80 billions to airwaves licenses or spectrum. On the other hand, China considers 5G network as a common goods for the country and people that should be affordable and widely available.

As the cost of 5G is cheap in China, the adoption of 5G is faster and less costly. Companies were able to recoup their investment quickly even though they charged much less than most other countries. Consequently, Chinese telecom companies have moved on from 5G to adopt 5.5G which is ten times faster. At the end of the day, Huawei would be benefited also as its superior technology can rollout and bring the costs down faster than its competitors. In conclusion, Chinese government is thinking for long term and most other countries just look for short term gains.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The US Federal Communications Commission on Friday (US time) announced the closing of the first phase of C-Band auction, that produced gross proceeds in excess of $80.9 billion, a record high. Bidders will also need pay $9.7 billion in incentive payments to accelerate the freeing up of spectrum in the key C-band by shifting existing satellite users. US-based Verizon and AT&T are expected to be the winners in the auction.

China has chosen to allocate spectrum according to the requirements and capabilities of telecom carriers instead of charging a great amount of spectrum occupation fee, which enables the operators to carry out large-scale network construction.

The government's requirement to accelerate network speed, lower fees and provide universal access to every village has promoted telecom operators to extend their networks to every corner of society, as consumers enjoy services at a lower cost.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China will soon fully replace lost EU markets – Gazprom​

Russian pipeline gas supplies to China will soon reach the volume sold to the EU before the bloc imposed sanctions on energy imports from Moscow, Gazprom CEO Aleksey Miller said on Wednesday.

The top executive stressed that only exports to China are able to substitute the volumes rejected by EU buyers as a result of Ukraine-related sanctions.

In January 2023, Russia became China’s number one supplier of natural gas, according to Chinese customs data.

Supplies via the Power of Siberia pipeline alone increased by 50% this year to 15.5 billion cubic meters, according to Russian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandr Novak. He added that in 2023, pipeline gas sales to China are expected to rise by 43 % to 22 billion cubic meters.

In June, Novak announced plans to increase Russian gas exports to Asian markets to 170 billion cubic meters over a seven-year period, once major infrastructure projects are implemented. Russia expects to build the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline to China though the territory of Mongolia, and increase supplies via the existing Power of Siberia pipeline.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the EU purchased 155 billion cubic meters of Russian gas in 2021, which accounted for 45% of the bloc's entire gas imports and about 40% of gas consumption.

In 2022, supplies of Russian pipeline gas to the EU nearly halved to around 80 billion cubic meters, according to data from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia working on infrastructure design for far eastern gas pipeline to China​

MOSCOW, Oct 19 (Reuters) - Russian energy giant Gazprom said on Thursday that it was working on the design of infrastructure for a gas pipeline from the Sakhalin region in Russia's Far East to China.

Russia and China agreed in early 2022 to boost supplies of Russian gas via the new pipeline, which would export 10 billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas per year.

Russia currently supplies gas to China via the Power of Siberia pipeline, which began operations in December 2019. It is due to supply 22 bcm in 2023, increasing to full capacity of 38 bcm a year by 2025, under a 30-year contract worth more than $400 billion.

Gazprom also said on Thursday that it and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) had signed an addendum to the deal on gas exports via the Power of Siberia for additional gas volumes to be supplied by the end of 2023.

It did not disclose further details.

Russia also hopes to secure a major deal to bring another 50 bcm a year to China via a new project, Power of Siberia 2, through Mongolia. However, the talks have been long and painstaking as key issues, such as the price of the gas, remain elusive.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Russian President Vladimir Putin told his Mongolian counterpart Ukhnaagiin Khurelsukh on Tuesday that he believed the Power of Siberia 2 would move ahead at a "good pace".

Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Mark Trevelyan

Pipeline from Sakhalin. Not the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
They could only name few countries among the 20. I dont think any one else matter except Turkey that could become partner in infrastructure.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Bangladesh, Senegal, Namibia and Moldova, Bloomberg News reported

Germany cannot handle basic housing let alone complex infrastructure.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Alexey Miller, the Gazprom CEO, is hyperventilating. Power of Siberia, even when it gets to full capacity, is roughly equivalent to the Nord Stream pipeline. Europe also consumed gas from the Yamal pipeline over Poland and the pipelines over Ukraine like the Brotherhood pipeline. Gazprom has lost a huge amount of foreign sales which cannot be covered by Power of Siberia alone.
Then there is the fact that the Russian gas which used to be sold to Europe came from the deposits in the Yamal peninsula in the Arctic, while Power of Siberia uses gas from different deposits in the Far East in Siberia. Right now, most of the Yamal and Urals gas that used to be sold to Europe has nowhere to go. Russia has been selling it to neighboring countries like Azerbaijan, Kazkhstan, etc but they cannot replace European demand.
In the long term to sell the Yamal gas to China will require the construction of the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline and Arctic LNG 2 facilities.
 
Top