even former Indian diplomats are acutely aware of the cowardice of the Indian political culture
Whose gonna pay for security when there's no economy?I think China has abandoned non interference policy recently, by backing Palestine and Argentina on the Malvinas/Falkland Islands territorial dispute. It's not a good idea to be different for the sake of being different. The world needs/wants an alternative to the US/West and China can't be an alternative if China is inactive outside China. China's Non Interference only lets the West to interfere freely. The West bully doesn't go away on its own. I think many countries don't count on China and choose to align with the U.S. because China only provides economy and doesn't provide security like the U.S. does. Economy is meaningless without security. Even if you regard China as a bully, it's better for the world to have multiple competing bullies than be stuck with the sole bully. More bullies are not a worse thing.
North Korea remind of Soviet Union. The way they maintain these birds show the technical skills of Koreans. Korea can become very strong military power if they reform.North Korea sided with the Soviet Union over China back in the day and people expect China to trust them? Kim purged his pro-China uncle and people expect China to trust him? North Korean historians continue to push their myth of Dangun Joseon while making historical claims on China’s Northeast, and this is supposed to be China’s ally? North Korea is a partner of necessity, not an actual ally.
Look at where the US builds up strong allies. It’s not generally in its own side of the world. The US likes South American countries weak and corrupt; it prefers countries next to China and Russia strong and capable. It should be obvious why that is.
If China is to cultivate strong allies, best do it near Western Europe and America. Not next to itself.
That is why China isn't really worried about Brazil's SSN program.North Korea sided with the Soviet Union over China back in the day and people expect China to trust them? Kim purged his pro-China uncle and people expect China to trust him? North Korean historians continue to push their myth of Dangun Joseon while making historical claims on China’s Northeast, and this is supposed to be China’s ally? North Korea is a partner of necessity, not an actual ally.
Look at where the US builds up strong allies. It’s not generally in its own side of the world. The US likes South American countries weak and corrupt; it prefers countries next to China and Russia strong and capable. It should be obvious why that is.
If China is to cultivate strong allies, best do it near Western Europe and America. Not next to itself.
It's difficult for you to understand Japanese values. Strictly speaking, this is not 'hatred', but a combination of jealousy, contempt, and fear.I don't agree with South Korea's hatred of China at all, but at least I can see where it comes from. Japan's hatred of China, on the other hand, never fails to baffle me. Sure, China sends some rude tourists to Japan every year, but are they really as bad as the millions of rude Japanese tourists that entered China from 1937-1945? Seriously, what has China ever done to Japan?
It's difficult for you to understand Japanese values. Strictly speaking, this is not 'hatred', but a combination of jealousy, contempt, and fear.
Someone has created a video collection summarizing how Japanese intellectuals devalued China before World War II:
The playback volume is not high because it is a video produced using academic articles, which is relatively dull. But if you take it seriously (if you understand Chinese), you will benefit a lot.
The change in Japanese mentality will not be so rapid. I have said many times that the Japanese have a psychological advantage against the Chinese because of historical factors. These Japanese intellectuals have created many theories to try to prove that Chinese culture is "corrupt", they believe that the Chinese people have no enterprising spirit and have fallen into irreparable stagnation. The entire country has no value in existence, and there is no need to retain the military. It is better to entrust the internal affairs and defense of the entire country to more responsible foreigners, such as Japan.
Ironically, after their defeat, they showed an ugly flattering attitude towards the United States, just like the China they depict.
The Japanese believe that they are the only East Asian leaders, and they joined the "civilized world" as early as the 19th century. After their defeat, they were fortunate enough to become members of the "free world". Joining the G7 made them feel like they had already joined the ruling group of the world.
But China remains Japan's biggest obstacle.And even more importantly, the path China has chosen is unimaginable to the Japanese.
I don't want the format of the answer to be like Quora's. This late outstanding journalist made everything very clear.
In short, Chinese people do not need to submit to the West in a humiliating manner like the Japanese, and have achieved higher achievements than Japan.
These Japanese intellectuals have created many theories to try to prove that Chinese culture is "corrupt", they believe that the Chinese people have no enterprising spirit and have fallen into irreparable stagnation. The entire country has no value in existence, and there is no need to retain the military. It is better to entrust the internal affairs and defense of the entire country to more responsible foreigners.
because it is in China’s interest not to have more nuclear capable countries, especially one right next door?There's a lot that China could do. Why did China approve UN sanctions against North Korea and Iran?
To avoid sanction on herself?Why does China abide by unilateral American sanctions?
because they provide little potential returns?Why doesn't China prioritise anti American countries in its investments?
What blockade?Why doesn't China break the blockade of Cuba?
The Hegemon can impose a lot more sanctions.In the past you could have argued that there would be a risk of secondary sanctions against China itself, but now decoupling is in full swing.
US also does a lot of things that make them weaker.Being different for the sake of being different is vain. Things work and don't work. You should think only what works and not. The U.S. does something because it works. You forgot the U.S. has the dollar and uses more economic sanctions than anyone else.
A lot of tools are of no use when they are bombed.
Money is of no use when a regime change happens and the puppet regime hands it all over to the U.S. This is the physical world we live in and things only move by physical force. The physical power is the only fundamental power and everything else is derivatives. You can't buy anything with money if the owner refuses to sell.
I can only imagine the misery of Japanese ultranationalists. Their sense of superiority has been completely shattered by the peaceful rise of China.It's difficult for you to understand Japanese values. Strictly speaking, this is not 'hatred', but a combination of jealousy, contempt, and fear.
Someone has created a video collection summarizing how Japanese intellectuals devalued China before World War II:
The playback volume is not high because it is a video produced using academic articles, which is relatively dull. But if you take it seriously (if you understand Chinese), you will benefit a lot.
The change in Japanese mentality will not be so rapid. I have said many times that the Japanese have a psychological advantage against the Chinese because of historical factors. These Japanese intellectuals have created many theories to try to prove that Chinese culture is "corrupt", they believe that the Chinese people have no enterprising spirit and have fallen into irreparable stagnation. The entire country has no value in existence, and there is no need to retain the military. It is better to entrust the internal affairs and defense of the entire country to more responsible foreigners, such as Japan.
Ironically, after their defeat, they showed an ugly flattering attitude towards the United States, just like the China they depict.
The Japanese believe that they are the only East Asian leaders, and they joined the "civilized world" as early as the 19th century. After their defeat, they were fortunate enough to become members of the "free world". Joining the G7 made them feel like they had already joined the ruling group of the world.
But China remains Japan's biggest obstacle.And even more importantly, the path China has chosen is unimaginable to the Japanese.
I don't want the format of the answer to be like Quora's. This late outstanding journalist made everything very clear.
In short, Chinese people do not need to submit to the West in a humiliating manner like the Japanese, and have achieved higher achievements than Japan.