The reasoning needs to go further. Out of China and America, only one of them have engaged in illegal invasions, only one of them is currently illegally occupying territory, only one of them have threatened to invade the other.Actually I feel that its a stroke of genius.
The point is exactly to communicate to the rest of the world that :
If America cannot accept a Chinese base in its vicinity (Cuba)
Why should China accept American bases in its vicinity (Taiwan, Philippines, Okinawa) ?
Or rather if America wants bases in Asia next to China
then China should be allowed bases near America
The mirror image could not be more clear
To defend against aggressors is the right of every state.
The line China should embrace is that it is ok and expected for it to establish defensive bases across south and central America, but Beijing will work tirelessly against any US base in Asia that could potentially be used in an attack on China.
Imposing penalties on US and NATO for establishing bases in Asia that could serve as staging ground for American aggression is not mutually exclusive with China establishing facilities near America to monitor and shorten a military response in the event of illegal US activity.