Miscellaneous News

pmc

Major
Registered Member
India should not be worried about China, because it is such a prime example of the power of freedom and democracy!
This person is not correct. Indian are deeply embedded in Software universe. This Hotmail of Microsoft came from Indian person.
or Vinod Kholsa of Sun.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
most of those bright Indians came at later age to US like for Master degree while most of US starts up founders are either born here or study much earlier age in US. so just because Indian sent there best does not mean they have that early experience advantage. I will put India above South Korea and Turkey as later two facing collapsing demographics and currency even though they are treaty allies of West and no one can demand ammunition or soldiers from India. so India does have the power for independent course.

Some Ukrainians support the Nazis and thinks like the Nazis.
I am actually surprised that Volodymyr put Ukrainian philosopher in his bio but not very informed. he thinks there is either West or Asia and not realizing much larger population growth is happening to the South and they are much more ruthless and deceptive today than any period. why do you think Mideast and India buying so many Boeing and Airbus planes.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
So it's Monday in Beijing. That's when Blinken is suppose to be going to China from what I've read. Anyone read from the Chinese side that Blinken is there? Like I said before, Westerners like to think wishful thinking is fact. Remember when PM Gordan Brown said China was sending troops to help the West out in Afghanistan? Something like that couldn't be a mistake or rumor so it had to be Westerners thinking they have the power of suggestion to will people into doing what they want.
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
So it's Monday in Beijing. That's when Blinken is suppose to be going to China from what I've read. Anyone read from the Chinese side that Blinken is there? Like I said before, Westerners like to think wishful thinking is fact. Remember when PM Gordan Brown said China was sending troops to help the West out in Afghanistan? Something like that couldn't be a mistake or rumor so it had to be Westerners thinking they have the power of suggestion to will people into doing what they want.
They said China would backstab russia in Ukraine and that Russia is diplomatic isolated in the world.
Western foreign policy and governments are becoming really schizo as fuck regarding reality.
As if they are entering their Mad King phase.

It probably has to do with the fact they could actually manifest fiction as reality in the 90s, 2000s and early 2010s because nations had to agree or suffer the consequences. Now in the 2020s it seems other nations are clowning the west and it's the west that is getting diplomatically isolated. Just take that picture of Blinken in Saudi Arabia where the US flag was missing, or how Turkey let EU top leadership act like clowns by making them play musical chairs.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Quoting what the US said in that article:
And there are a number of other examples in that space of UNESCO’s mission where our absence is noticed and where it undercuts our ability to be as effective in promoting our vision of a free world

Your "vision of a free world" like 52764 different genders, illustrations of people having sex in children's school textbooks, pregnant men and legalized pedophilia?

Fvck no, thank you. Please do the rest of the world a massive favor by just staying the fvck out of UNESCO.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Where Canada finds the audacity to confiscate property and arrest people arbitrarily?
That thing has been parked at Pearson International Airport for quite some time. I had been wondering why that Russian aircraft has been stationed there. I had some inclination that it was grounded by the Canadian authorities for reasons now known to most of us here.
 

Rast

New Member
Registered Member
Hasn't the Thai military coup the gov a few times?

Yes, most recently in 2014. The military ruled directly until 2019 when they carved out a power sharing agreement where they still appoint all members of the national senate which has a veto over the democratically elected portion of legislature and a veto over other appointments including the prime minister.

To be fair most of American infrastructure is constructed decades ago. Without proper maintenance any bridge is prone to failure.

Neglecting maintenance would be a failure of both the government and society as the US is also a democracy.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member

Opinion: Luxury goods: Europe’s joke on the world​

The old continent profits from the cultural insecurities of other regions

Search online for the Bulgari Serpenti watch. Gold, steel and diamond in construction, one model coils around the wrist three times, in case someone misses it on first or second glance. Or consider the Gucci Marmont Matelassé shoulder bag. It has two big “G”s on it in gold and — that being insufficient gold — a gold chain. A third item for our delectation might be a Givenchy T-shirt. You can tell it is Givenchy because it says “GIVENCHY”.

I am no arbiter of taste, so it is with some hesitation that I make the following argument. This stuff is tat, isn’t it? It is a naïf’s idea of glamour. Like paying for a Twitter blue tick, wearing it conveys the opposite of status: neediness, impressionability.

There are lots of bad arguments against the booming European (in truth, Franco-Italian) luxury goods sector. No, it isn’t immoral. LVMH employs people and pays taxes. Nor does it matter that US tech is more “serious”. All economies have their specialisms, their comparative advantages. Is Europe meant to neglect its own until it builds a Silicon Riviera or whatever?

All these complaints avoid the central issue: the intrinsic ghastliness of the products. And the ease with which Europe can foist them on extra-European markets. I don’t suggest that LVMH boss Bernard Arnault laughs at America and Asia behind his hands. But he must know that he can put out almost any trinket and find a paying audience. In his place, I would be drawling ideas into a Dictaphone at 3am, just to see what can be got away with. “Gilt phone charger . . . ivory kennel . . .”

The luxe boom tells you more about world politics than another Henry Kissinger interview will. Such as? The “global south”, wherever that is, has a more complex attitude to its old oppressors than it often pretends. Yes, there is suspicion, much of it warranted. There is superiority, much of it earned. (How could a Singaporean not find western Europe static?)

But there is also the opposite: an undue but ingrained deference to Europe on certain questions of taste. VS Naipaul wrote about the postcolonial urge to “mimic” the metropole. This once meant Anglicising things: accents, manners, names. A childhood memory of mine from Nigeria is “Oxford bread”, which I am sure was just bread.

As poor countries sprouted a commercial overclass, their mimicry took the form of consuming the “best” Old World brands. But it comes down to the same thing: self-doubt, at the national and cultural level. The luxury trade isn’t evil. But it is sad. There is something pathetic, in the original sense of the word, about a certain kind of global luxe living: marble floors, white furniture, champagne flutes, too-strong fragrances, restaurants with handbag stools. It is not the visual naffness. It is the imitation of an aesthetic that is held in ironic disdain in its home market.

As poor countries sprouted a commercial overclass, their mimicry took the form of consuming the “best” Old World brands. But it comes down to the same thing: self-doubt, at the national and cultural level. The luxury trade isn’t evil. But it is sad. There is something pathetic, in the original sense of the word, about a certain kind of global luxe living: marble floors, white furniture, champagne flutes, too-strong fragrances, restaurants with handbag stools. It is not the visual naffness. It is the imitation of an aesthetic that is held in ironic disdain in its home market.

No, be honest, let go of embarrassment, and admit that Europe is playing a very remunerative joke on the world. More power to it. Here is the other geopolitical lesson of the luxe boom. Don’t write off the old continent. Tourism, luxury, football: nowhere enchants foreigners so profitably. The idea that Europe is a pleasure palace, not a wealth-making machine, assumes it can’t turn the one into the other on a lasting basis.

“Do you know anyone who buys this stuff?” asked a (British) friend last month, when the luxe trade was in the news. I used to.
Soho. 1996. Fake, stolen or imperceptibly damaged luxury goods are being sold from a crate. Your columnist and his associates have to buy fast or what these vendors call the “feds” will turn up. We “score” a Dior watch, Versace jeans and a belt from Moschino (which we pronounce Mosh-een-o). Over time, the dream comes true: no item on our persons is without a famous logo.
I desired these marques because I was 14 and a considerable idiot. To think I also saw where the world was going.

Non paywall source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Good article. I had always suspected that the European luxury fashion brands are priced more for their brand than their material. I've had a chat with an Italian guy about this. He told me that an average fashion student in Italy could recreated those fine leather products from LVMH for a fraction of the cost. He also said that those big Italian fashion brands have much bigger outlets in Asia than back at home. So their target market is actually abroad, not at home. In our Asian societies, these luxury items are more important as status symbols, than the actual products.

I have 2 funny examples:

I had a friend who bought an LV T-shirt to join a clique of people. That T-shirt costed him more than 10x the price of an average-branded t-shirt. Yet it's little more than a heat-pressed T-shirt. He had to use a credit card to buy that thing, as it costs him as much as his monthly wage. But it was worth it for him. He found his future wife from that clique of people. Whatever we want to say about that, that is his life, and he looks happy, as far as I'm concerned.

I had another friend who upgraded from a Lexus to a Lamborghini. He is no average dude, but he can barely afford that car. No doubt that the Lamborghini vastly outclasses the Lexus on paper. But maintaining and fueling that Lamborghini also vastly outclasses the Lexus. That Lamborghini ended up being a garage queen. And when my friend took it for a spin, he never drives above 100km/h. So it kinda defeats the purpose of owning that kinda car. He had to get another Suzuki to become his everyday car. But then again, that Lamborghini elevated his social status. He can now enter places and join cliques that he couldn't before.

I grew up admiring and aspiring to own some of these European luxury stuff. But now that I've heard from people who have reached there, the picture is not that rosy after all. This dream that the West sells to us, about buying their nice cars, nice house, nice clothes, etc. I think it misdirects alot of society to pursue these things for little reason other than status. While at the same time, the Western luxury businesses make huge money out of them. They won't care if you took a loan to buy them, bought it with clean cash or with dirty cash. It is not wrong to buy and own luxury stuff from the West, but I think our Asian societies should moderate our obsession with them. People can buy and enjoy them as they are, but these things should not become a social status for them. People have taken loans, cheat, steal, and sometimes murdered to get these luxury goods.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Good article. I had always suspected that the European luxury fashion brands are priced more for their brand than their material. I've had a chat with an Italian guy about this. He told me that an average fashion student in Italy could recreated those fine leather products from LVMH for a fraction of the cost. He also said that those big Italian fashion brands have much bigger outlets in Asia than back at home. So their target market is actually abroad, not at home. In our Asian societies, these luxury items are more important as status symbols, than the actual products.

I have 2 funny examples:

I had a friend who bought an LV T-shirt to join a clique of people. That T-shirt costed him more than 10x the price of an average-branded t-shirt. Yet it's little more than a heat-pressed T-shirt. He had to use a credit card to buy that thing, as it costs him as much as his monthly wage. But it was worth it for him. He found his future wife from that clique of people. Whatever we want to say about that, that is his life, and he looks happy, as far as I'm concerned.

I had another friend who upgraded from a Lexus to a Lamborghini. He is no average dude, but he can barely afford that car. No doubt that the Lamborghini vastly outclasses the Lexus on paper. But maintaining and fueling that Lamborghini also vastly outclasses the Lexus. That Lamborghini ended up being a garage queen. And when my friend took it for a spin, he never drives above 100km/h. So it kinda defeats the purpose of owning that kinda car. He had to get another Suzuki to become his everyday car. But then again, that Lamborghini elevated his social status. He can now enter places and join cliques that he couldn't before.

I grew up admiring and aspiring to own some of these European luxury stuff. But now that I've heard from people who have reached there, the picture is not that rosy after all. This dream that the West sells to us, about buying their nice cars, nice house, nice clothes, etc. I think it misdirects alot of society to pursue these things for little reason other than status. While at the same time, the Western luxury businesses make huge money out of them. They won't care if you took a loan to buy them, bought it with clean cash or with dirty cash. It is not wrong to buy and own luxury stuff from the West, but I think our Asian societies should moderate our obsession with them. People can buy and enjoy them as they are, but these things should not become a social status for them. People have taken loans, cheat, steal, and sometimes murdered to get these luxury goods.
The right answer is to support locally sourced brands that make the same high quality type of stuff. You'll get in the same cliques without having supported foreign figures with sketchy moral motivations. Sure, not all foreign luxury brands are bad, but even if some are good, they won't lose sleep because they lose 1 Asian customer. They have plenty of Europeans at home to buy their stuff.

You also have a better idea of what kind of employment/labor standards a local brand will have compared to an "international" one.

Let the Italians buy their own Italian luxury products to support themselves, while Chinese should buy Chinese luxury products to support themselves. Simple as.
 
Top