so market it as weight loss food...
Didn’t Ireland label their bread as cake lol.
so market it as weight loss food...
Did... did Bridge actually use the term "anti-hegemonic" to refer to the US and its flunkies? What timeline am I in? When did I cross the quantum membrane separating the different realities?
I wouldn't go that far. There are many companies in mainland China that operate via 军事化管理, with GWM one of the most famous example. GWM's poor pay and bad work environment is infamous in Chinese auto industry. Rumor has it that Pierre Leclercq - former head of design - left because of this, resulting in the subjectively terrible designs that they have today.TSMC Arizona is absolutely fucked. The Taiwanese business model is not suitable for the US, shit it is barely suitable for China itself. Taiwanese business model is built on Imperial Japanese style military discipline and absolute obedience with 0 innovation allowed from the employees. Only a small subset of employees are allowed to innovate. This is why Taiwanese companies are good at producing no name generic products but has no real brands of its own.
This is in stark contrast to Chinese companies which are built around employee level entrepreneurship and innovation. This fact is even admitted by elite US business schools. This is also why Chinese companies are heavy on branding and IP.
Perhaps our internet historians got it wrong. There was no Finno-Korean Hyperwar, rather Akhand Bharat-Hwan Megawar for universal supremacy instead.Having a depiction of Akhand Bharat on the parliament building is as egregious as it gets, but that depiction is nowhere the most extreme Akhand Bharat.
Here is the dream of a lot of Indian Hindu nationalists
View attachment 114103
More revisionism?
View attachment 114104
And my favorites:
View attachment 114105
Who f@cking cares, it’s New York, the capital of the LGBTQ and all the kinds of mad evil that the USA is famous for and also let’s not forget how the USA keeps on harping about Chinas air quality while doing most of the manufacturing for these pigs. If they cannot take care of their own selves, then I guess they should choke on their own suffering. They have trillions of dollar of debt and nothing to show for it, so I guess they didn’t suffer enough to actually try and change their own selves instead of going around the world and bombing innocent people all the time
TSMC is not uninnovative, but it has pockets of isolation. The employees designated to be innovative will be given the opportunity to be innovative. Everyone else is not. It is not like a US company where even junior engineers or technicians have initiative. The bottom level opportunity for innovation is what makes many US companies successful, and Chinese companies have learned from that.I wouldn't go that far. There are many companies in mainland China that operate via 军事化管理, with GWM one of the most famous example. GWM's poor pay and bad work environment is infamous in Chinese auto industry. Rumor has it that Pierre Leclercq - former head of design - left because of this, resulting in the subjectively terrible designs that they have today.
Also, TSMC is very innovative. They were the ones that pioneered the concept of immersion DUV afterall along with many EUV advances.
Perhaps our internet historians got it wrong. There was no Finno-Korean Hyperwar, rather Akhand Bharat-Hwan Megawar for universal supremacy instead.
按市场规律,达到无为而治。因为企业管理的极致就是员工自己管理自己,最终取消管理。
比亚迪在深圳大鹏新区投资兴建的一个住宅小区,只要成了家,夫妻双方都在比亚迪上班,就有资格以很低的价格购买这里的住房。这里俨然就是一个小社会,学校、幼儿园、社康中心一应俱全,比亚迪拥有国企抛弃的一切东西。只有让员工不断跟比亚迪发生各种联系,而不是仅限于上班时间,才能让员工产生认同感。
小米没有森严的等级,每一位员工都是平等的,每一位同事都是自己的伙伴。
小米崇尚创新、快速的互联网文化,讨厌冗长的会议和流程,让每位员工在轻松的伙伴式工作氛围中发挥自己的创意。
小米相信用户就是驱动力,并坚持“为发烧而生”的产品理念。
1、开放:很容易理解,理念上开放、态度上开放,华为才能成为世界级公司,业务遍布世界170多个国家。开放不仅仅是文化上,更体现在员工融合包容层面,华为三十年,经历了中国70、80、90三个年龄层的员工,每一代员工都有自己鲜明的时代性格色彩,不要将管理者个人思想强加到别人身上,更多的需要倾听不同的意见,取长补短,以一种开放的心态吸纳大家的智慧,包容差异,可以是团队更具活力与凝聚力。
2、妥协:接纳不同的声音,作为管理者不能强制压迫,要换位思考,只要方向不变,原则不变,实现目标路上的一切都可以妥协。
US is already overstretched, losing its edge and running low on resources to sustain its hegemony, and yet it continues to expand militarily on two fronts (Europe, Asia) while trying to hold onto Middle East. If US keeps this up, it is inevitable that US will eventually exhaust all resources, runs itself into the ground and implodes. It is impossible for US elites and their vassals to not see this. It is conceivable that US is gearing up for an all-out pre-emptive attack against China a la Pearl Habour when oppertune time arrives. I propose a hypothetic scenario:
Yes, Chinese tech companies have learned from US work culture, but not all companies. 军事化管理 is still prevalent amongst Chinese companies.TSMC is not uninnovative, but it has pockets of isolation. The employees designated to be innovative will be given the opportunity to be innovative. Everyone else is not. It is not like a US company where even junior engineers or technicians have initiative. The bottom level opportunity for innovation is what makes many US companies successful, and Chinese companies have learned from that.
The top tier successful ones with their own brands, not just Haier but also Xiaomi, BYD, Huawei, etc all operate via an entrepreneurship model that builds employee self motivation rather than hierarchical micromanaging.