you really clinching straws.
You're clinching shit in your skull pretending it's a brain.
you earlies claimed that Mexico tourism is cheap but in 2023. things already expensive in Mexico. you really need to provide current data not make statements.
You are stupid. It's cheap.
Also, Mexican per capita PPP (if you even know what that is) is about $23K, while it is about $80K in America. And if you answer with that the cost of living is lower in Mexico, this it shows that you don't know what PPP is or that it was made to already consider cost of living.
It just show how strong is Mexico soft power that American have confidence on there medical services.
You article specifically states that Americans going to Mexico for dentistry do it because it's cheap, not because it's better or the same. I do have confidence that they can do routine procedures well, since they do them all day long and would be killed by angry customers if they messed up. But that's the same for all countries with a functioning government. Dentistry skill is the hard power of the dentist.
first there is no evidence that that those are really Mexican. or those have arrived recently.
First, I already showed that about 600K in 1.6M are Mexican. Secondly it doesn't matter. I didn't pick Mexico to shit on Mexico. I chose Mexico as just an example of people being attracted to American hard economic power. No matter who they were, from Colombia, Ecquador, Costa Rica, Honduras, my point is still proven that people come for economic reasons, not soft power.
they can be people fled from law enforcement in Mexico.
No, they answered "Economic reasons," not fleeing from the law. Literacy is a requirement for debate.
but the point is the FDI in Mexico has consistently increased. so international investors have confidence on Mexico work ethic and skill set and are assured of demographic strength. Those who have skills that are not fleeing to Northern part of America.
No, FDI increase is not the point at all. FDI increases can be for any country with good prospects, but still far away from having the economy and quality of life of a developed advanced economy.
yes. it is not job that every one like it and even if they like it they are going to be fit for this job.
Paying money to hire air traffic controllers is not soft power. Your main problem is that you don't know what soft power is at all, and you obviously have no idea what qualifications a country needs to be considered powerful or competent.
An air traffic controller costs 37K MXN or $2,100 USD per month in Mexico. Any Walmart costs more to run.
it can be Mexican government putting pressure on US for other concessions. there is no way to create such Carvan without Mexican authorities behind it. have you read Mexican president statements that he makes time to time.
You ask me for data when I say something but you make up random nonsense like this?
where you get this idea they want to come. Mexico wages are consistently going up. Work is moving there.
I got the idea from the fact that Mexicans max out the US quota every year and the ones that don't get a spot try to enter illegally against American armed border patrol.
Vacation =/= work/immigration.
Mexican debt is relevant metric. It shows strength of society and its Soft Power without putting burden on government. You still need healthy worker and infrastructure to build this scale of Export and Import operations.
Economic strength is hard power. Lower debt does not indicate strength if comparing to a much larger economy by nominal and PPP measures.
5% over more than decade to the mightiest power next door
Ahhhh, that's right. The mightiest power next door. That's the point. The hard economic power disparity is what's causing Mexicans to go to America.
but still Mexico population has grown faster than US. have you tried putting any other developing country next to US and see how what ever agriculture and manufacturing they have is decimated. think before make a comparison. Even Wealthy Canada what is left of what they had as independent brands and that country has imported alot more immigrants.
No, you think before you speak, if you're capable. Because I already said that Mexico is not the point. I just picked a situation where hard power disparity causes immigration and that's all there is to it. I don't hate Mexico and I don't think it is a shitty country in the world. Because you lost track of the conversation, you thought my point was to shit on Mexico when it is to demonstrate hard power over soft power in immigration.
provide data that Mexico is losing skill people.
Again?
""The number of Mexican immigrants with a bachelor’s degree or higher grew from 269,000 in 2000 to 678,000 in 2017""
Mexico is technically strong country as it hardly sent any one to US top universities but still can work with US business.
That's a very unique definition of "strong" used by nobody except you.
This data upto 2017 for Mexico and not showing what they major in.
Tripled the numbers. Whatever they majored in, bachelor's degree is generally skill labor. Here's for tech:
and if we take the numbers its drop in bucket for such a period.
You ask for numbers increasing, and I show you they almost tripled. Then you say it's a drop in the bucket... at 5%. You're just making up what that means. As long as more than 50% of Mexicans are in Mexico, you can claim some bullshit about drop in the bucket.
Money is hard power but spending money not to create more money but to create soft image through sports is creating Soft Power. that part you consistently missing it or not understanding it. Unless you think Qatar earned $200B from FIFA. Countries are after Soft Power.
I understand it's theory but it has no results. You can say anybody has or doesn't have soft power because you have no definition of it, neither can you show what the "soft power" brought them. They have nothing to show for their imaginary "soft power" except more imaginary "soft power."
and than Biden got elected. do you think all those European heritage not influenced.
European heritage? Biden vs Trump? Trump is the one with German heritage.
Its very difficult to consistently goes against Germany. one term you can do it but than the consensus decisions of Nato/EU and all the organizations that Germany is driving force overpower every thing.
So in your deranged imagination, what actions/how did Germany influence the US election? How are they controlling NATO/EU? Cus I see them having absolutely no influence, mostly being forced to give up their own things/interests.
Yup Try give to Japan/Korea/French on same scale.
They got out-competed by hard cash/subsidies. End of story, no soft power.
where is official data and what is included?
Data that Russians died? Go the the Ukraine thread and see how many Russians died. Everybody has a number, but unless that person is a mentally challenged one like you, that number is not 0.
Yeah, cus too many Russians died.
they withdrew to more sustainable posture.
That is true, but it wouldn't have to be if they were strong enough to hold and take more. Lack of hard power is the issue.
It is integration of Arab world and India into West through prolong Ukraine conflict.
No, that's actually done. The useful part, proving that Western banks can't be trusted, is done and the USD is falling in usage. Russia can just finish up and win now if they're capable.
you can take this statement to the bank for the rest of your time.
Everything you say is retarded. If I gave that statement to my bank, they would ask what resource management/long term investment plan I'd like during the years I'm institutionalized and require my legal caretaker to sign for me.
