Miscellaneous News

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Why is the defense minister saying this? Shouldn't their Head of state or Foreign affairs department strongly condemn such plans or alternatively beg and grovel for their overlord not to do it? This is a political problem, not a military one, as Taiwan has zero military means of stopping it from happening.
I shall quote Henry Kissinger again: "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
While China doesn't start out with good ground based air defence over Taiwan due to local resistence, they still have full complements of air patrols that will be devoted to stopping American attacks, as well as naval based AAMs.

So I think American being able to bomb Taiwan province is questionable. A few attacks might hit, but as shown by the Ukraine war, you need long term sustained bombing to have a major effect. Just the presence of CAP and naval air defense will restrict attacks to long range missiles only, which are more easily interceptable. Admittedly the island is not anywhere near as defended as other areas, but as Beijing rolls back the KMT forces, that will change.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
While China doesn't start out with good ground based air defence over Taiwan due to local resistence, they still have full complements of air patrols that will be devoted to stopping American attacks, as well as naval based AAMs.

So I think American being able to bomb Taiwan province is questionable. A few attacks might hit, but as shown by the Ukraine war, you need long term sustained bombing to have a major effect. Just the presence of CAP and naval air defense will restrict attacks to long range missiles only, which are more easily interceptable. Admittedly the island is not anywhere near as defended as other areas, but as Beijing rolls back the KMT forces, that will change.
All the air defence and intelligence can be compromised. They use American systems and are riffed with traitors.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

G-7 to help emerging economies move up supply chains for EVs, solar panels​

Partnership with World Bank intended to develop manufacturing, cutting reliance on China

TOKYO -- The Group of Seven rich nations is considering a partnership with the World Bank to build more resilient supply chains for clean-energy technology by providing funding and other support to emerging markets, Nikkei has learned. The G-7 aims to lift these countries beyond resource extraction into the more profitable business of manufacturing products like electric vehicles and solar panels, by helping them secure the needed technology and infrastructure funding.

The G-7 is considering contributing capital to the World Bank for the effort. The hope is to spur more diversified supply chains, reducing the need to rely on China for strategically important products as the global decarbonization push accelerates. The proposal will be made at a meeting of G-7 finance ministers and central bankers in Japan starting Thursday, with the goal of reaching an agreement at next week's leaders summit in Hiroshima. The specifics would be hammered out within the year.

G-7 host Japan has invited outside countries including India and Indonesia to both meetings, where the proposal will be presented as a new avenue to support developing countries, such as resource-rich African nations. Rich nations will provide technical support and training. G-7 finance ministers and central bankers affirmed their intent to "support low- and middle-income countries to play bigger roles in supply chains" at their previous meeting last month in Washington.

Non paywall source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Still going to cost them more. What happened to bringing back home those jobs...? China was cheapest place in the world for the least cost for production. Any place else it'll cost them more money. Where's all these alternate countries from China shipping fleets to get raw materials to make those products? All the countries they see as an alternative will expect the rich West to pay for it. Every step of the way is going to cost them more money beyond just labor. That's why during the height of globalization, Mexico was more expensive than China that was half way around the world. Remember India and Vietnam tried making their own smart phone... with all the parts coming from China.

The US and the West think their money is the only real money in the world. Hence why they think the world can't live without their consumers buying it. China is the largest and still growing consumer market in the world. They, especially Europe, need Chinese buying their crap. They already have the US and it's still not enough money for them or they wouldn't be in the sorry shape they are in now. This is the fall of Roman time for the West because the spoiled kids of the legacy rich are in control of their countries now. They never earned it. It was given to them like a spoiled brat. Just look at Westerners who charge that China can only steal and copy. And what did they personally invent...? Nothing. Living off of someone else's success.
 
Last edited:

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Some old news from last month.

Both sides agreed the talks will cover areas including goods trade, investment, digital economy and green economy to create a more inclusive, modern, comprehensive and mutually beneficial free trade area.


1) That is the plan. In a general sense, China and ASEAN will rely on technology to increase income for their country. The tech that will propel this will be part of the digital economy aka the computing and network infrastructure (where that Chinese company will be selling ASEAN the most competitive gear), and the green economy will increase in prominence, with several Chinese companies selling the tech to make that transformation. Make these large scale transformation of the economy, and relying on the application of this technology, it should move China and all of ASEAN from being a middle income country to a high income country.

2) That is why this US government war against Huawei 5G is a complete joke. It was a bit of a joke, but now, a complete joke. Who the hell cares.

3) China and Philippines relations will be interesting the next few years. Simply put, China and ASEAN going one way, while China and Philippines going the other way.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
4) So they are discussing the upgrade of the China-ASEAN free trade area. While the RCEP already exists. Guess not everybody inside of RCEP trust all other members. The United States government, under Biden are a bunch of morons. They do not even have a China strategy or plan. While ASEAN and China, when it comes to trade, they got the RCEP which is a plan, and a backup plan with their free trade area. And all the Americans want to do is tell everyone to not use Huawei. What a bunch of insert your obscenities here. Frigging morons.

:p
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
China and ASEAN, that probably is a population of 2 billion people.

This is the fastest growing area in the entire world.

Chinese tech will play a big role in transforming these economies, and the infrastructure building should be massive.

The sheer size of China and ASEAN, will just feed off each other, like two singers singing, they want to sing well.

Here are the Americans, talking crap non-stop. Go screw yourself Biden Blinken and Sullivan.

Seems like that China and ASEAN was the template, then it could be China and West Asia, China and South America, China and Africa.

And the Americans, are still talking crap non-stop. Go screw yourself Moe Larry and Curly.

Is China enjoying this? I would think, hell no. They too BU$Y making deal$. Who cares about the Americans. They other people, yeah, you know they are enjoying it.

Then they get to not use the US dollar, and then crow about it as well. They enjoying it.

:p
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
Some Taiwan province news ...



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Haha poor bastard seems to be under impression that Taiwanese will have a say in.

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — New Taipei City Mayor and Prospective Kuomintang (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) on Monday (May 8) made his political stances on Taiwan Independence and China's "one country, two systems" formula clear for the first time publicly.

At a session of the New Taipei City Council, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors pressed Hou on his stance on the two cross-strait issues. Hou responded by saying, "I oppose one country, two systems, uphold Taiwan's own democratic values, and move forward," reported CNA.
Hou said that one has a legal basis under the Constitution of the Republic of China, but "Taiwan independence has no legal basis, so I oppose Taiwan independence."

友谊 indeed
 

bettydice

Junior Member
Registered Member
2) That is why this US government war against Huawei 5G is a complete joke. It was a bit of a joke, but now, a complete joke. Who the hell cares.
You're missing the core nature of the matter.

1) Huawei (and ZTE etc.)'s competitors like Samsung and Nokia got easy contracts for free and secured their survival.

2) Huawei (and ZTE etc.) lost the U.S. and its vassal market.

This is a hegemony war about who controls what. This isn't about enjoying the best technology or prosperity. The U.S. doesn't have control over Huawei's equipment and network and that's the problem for the U.S. By banning Huawei, the U.S. ensures control over its and its vassal territories.
 
Last edited:

Hitomi

Junior Member
Registered Member
While China doesn't start out with good ground based air defence over Taiwan due to local resistence, they still have full complements of air patrols that will be devoted to stopping American attacks, as well as naval based AAMs.

So I think American being able to bomb Taiwan province is questionable. A few attacks might hit, but as shown by the Ukraine war, you need long term sustained bombing to have a major effect. Just the presence of CAP and naval air defense will restrict attacks to long range missiles only, which are more easily interceptable. Admittedly the island is not anywhere near as defended as other areas, but as Beijing rolls back the KMT forces, that will change.
But what if the Americans use a few B-2s with cruise missiles just to preemptively blow up the fabs even if they are still in the hands of the Taiwanese? Will the PLAAF or PLANAF CAP extend that far away in the initial stages just to prevent B-2s from striking targets on Taiwan? Even though I think they have far easier options for sabotaging the fabs without utilizing strategic bombers.
 
Top