When EU begins to mess around with China, China will be happy to see door to the hell wide open for the messers. Ambassadors are not Judge in the court, they are representing the countries interests which isn't exactly matter of words on a piece of paper. Call China hypocrite as they will, we have been calling the west for so long and it didn't work.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
When EU begins to mess around with China, China will be happy to see door to the hell wide open for the messers. Ambassadors are not Judge in the court, they are representing the countries interests which isn't exactly matter of words on a piece of paper. Call China hypocrite as they will, we have been calling the west for so long and it didn't work.
kwaigonegin
Colonel
I can only hope it's a case of his words taken out of context because if he really said that then it's not a good look. You don't question sovereignty of recognized countries, that will give ammo to western countries.
The big thing that needs to be considered is that the US and it's vassals having undermining sovereignty against non-western countries (Iran in particular was the most recent example of this in action, let alone China et al), which is why countries not inside the western sphere pushing back against the western determinations of political sovereignty does make sense.
China's non-interference policy should only apply to others who do not interfere. Should be mutual. I also find it really annoying that the western press seems to give headline to no-body states... like "oh no lithuana with low economic output, low outlook, low population thinks negatively of China or China must do x , y and z!"
If you begin to give consideration to that "if" based on the western report, you already loose. That is why most of non-west countries are always loosing for the past hundreds years. China being the exception is precisely because we had Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and now Xi Jinping who don't give a fuck of what the west says/looks/likes.
Sovereignty of one is conditional on mutual respect. All Axis countries' sovereignty were "violated" by Allies, there was nothing wrong about that, at least in the eyes of the Allies including China. So if any country joins a military alliance threatening another country's existence, they have put their own existence in question. This is not only about NATO vs. Russia, but also US, Japan, SK vs. China. China is making her position understood.
Last edited:
Calling boy geopolitical and geography genius with a PhD @abc123 read the new CNAS/Congressional report on their pseudo arm chair generalship again which EMPHASIZE YET AGAIN THAT ONCE THE WAR IN TAIWAN STARTS THE U.S. WON'T BE ABLE TO SUPPLY TAIWAN ARMS PHILIPPINES OR NO PHILIPPINES. DO SOME ACTUAL READING OTHER THAN REGURGITATING BULLSHIT AND TRYING TO AGITATE PEOPLE LIKE WE'RE ILLITERATE MONKEYS.
So long as Taiwan has no nukes, no US bases/troops, they can prepare for another 70 years, China will still crush them. The nice thing is another 70 years later, China will be mature, industrialized, economy, by far bigger than US, and assured superiority in local conflict on China's doorsteps, further ensuring US staying out. Before 2027, US still has advantages in economy and navy/air force, so there are some risks and uncertainty. Plus, to conquer Taiwan by 2027 needs to literally blow everything up and restart from scratch (see Ukraine war), so what China gains is an expensive rebuild on top of a disrupted growth story.
Which is precisely why we know his words were twisted and/or misquoted by Western media.