Miscellaneous News

canonicalsadhu

Junior Member
Registered Member
Call me back when Finland enacts a large-scale tariff on China.

It's been half a decade since the New Cold War started. Not a single European country - in fact not a single American ally, not even Australia! - has placed large-scale tariffs or bans on Chinese goods.

One pattern I've observed over the years is that Europeans love to talk about reducing dependency on China. They especially love doing so in English when speaking with Americans. Yet when it comes to anti-China action, the Europeans always seem to be rudely interrupted by a critical summer beach holiday that comes first in priority.
True. Germany spent the whole year talking about "reducing dependence on China" yet their trade with China skyrocketed this year - increasing by 21% and trade deficit more than doubled. Politicians like to talk but the market forces are just too strongly aligned with China.
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
Call me back when Finland enacts a large-scale tariff on China.

It's been half a decade since the New Cold War started. Not a single European country - in fact not a single American ally, not even Australia! - has placed large-scale tariffs or bans on Chinese goods.

One pattern I've observed over the years is that Europeans love to talk about reducing dependency on China. They especially love doing so in English when speaking with Americans. Yet when it comes to anti-China action, the Europeans always seem to be rudely interrupted by a critical summer beach holiday that comes first in priority.
To reduce dependency on China you would need a big big re-industrialisation plan of multiple decades. Imaging having to plan and execute all that while you could also be out there drinking virgin blood and do all other kind of degen stuff.
 

Lethe

Captain

What's going on here? The south Koreans leadership is so deeply cucked as to shit on their own victims of Japanese wartime crimes.

This would seem to be the sticking point:

"As a part of the 1965 agreement, Tokyo paid hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and loans to the South Korean government to resolve compensation-related issues from the colonial period. Most of the money was funneled into national economic projects rather than given to individual Koreans who suffered under the occupation."

I imagine that Tokyo's position is that it has already paid compensation for the forced labor in question and it is up to Seoul to distribute that compensation appropriately. Without examining the 1965 agreement, it seems plausible.

The broader question is just how devoted Seoul was to obtaining a just dispensation in 1965. The relationship between the ROK, chaebols, and collaborators with the Japanese occupation is well-known, as is the attitude of the ROK government towards much of its own communist-sympathizing citizenry at the time.

China could accept mass immigration if she wanted, it's just that she doesn't want that. She doesn't want to be an ethnically, and racially, divided country like the US, where civil unrest might happen at any time. China could immigrate all the SE Asia if it wanted due to its economic power and standard of living especially in large cities but China doesn't want that. The division is a weakness. China values its Han ethnic unity the most. That's why Chiha is so much faster than the US in making decisions in following them amongst other things.

30% of the current Australian population was born overseas, one of the highest ratios in the world. We are happy to import people from China, South-East Asia, India, Africa, Southern and Eastern Europe, the Levant, wherever, because we know that within a couple of generations they will all become fat, lazy and stupid like the rest of us Anglos. :cool:
 
Last edited:

Hadoren

Junior Member
Registered Member
To reduce dependency on China you would need a big big re-industrialisation plan of multiple decades.
This is completely false.

Completely eliminating dependency on China requires one simple step. Just replace all your Chinese imports with Vietnamese imports.

Did you know that Vietnam has an identical substitute for everything that China makes? It looks the same, it feels the same - it is the same.

The only difference is that "Made in Vietnam" costs 15% more and takes a couple of weeks longer to ship. As your Vietnamese supplier will tell you, this is because Vietnam's logistics network is less developed. So it takes a bit longer for product to arrive from the factories in Vietnam's populous but far-flung northern provinces.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
This is completely false.

Completely eliminating dependency on China requires one simple step. Just replace all your Chinese imports with Vietnamese imports.

Did you know that Vietnam has an identical substitute for everything that China makes? It looks the same, it feels the same - it is the same.

The only difference is that "Made in Vietnam" costs 15% more and takes a couple of weeks longer to ship. As your Vietnamese supplier will tell you, this is because Vietnam's logistics network is less developed. So it takes a bit longer for product to arrive from the factories in Vietnam's populous but far-flung northern provinces.

That’s like saying your dad can replace IKEA because he makes chairs in his garage workshop.
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is completely false.

Completely eliminating dependency on China requires one simple step. Just replace all your Chinese imports with Vietnamese imports.

Did you know that Vietnam has an identical substitute for everything that China makes? It looks the same, it feels the same - it is the same.

The only difference is that "Made in Vietnam" costs 15% more and takes a couple of weeks longer to ship. As your Vietnamese supplier will tell you, this is because Vietnam's logistics network is less developed. So it takes a bit longer for product to arrive from the factories in Vietnam's populous but far-flung northern provinces.

It's not "Made in Vietnam", it's "Made in Vietnam with Chinese parts". They are mostly only assembling there.

And the last time I checked Vietnam had around 15 times smaller population size than China.

They could try with India, but the country is a political and infrastructural mess, it ain't worth even for assembly.
 

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
The United States and other western countries are losing the race with China to develop advanced technologies and retain talent, with Beijing potentially establishing a monopoly in some areas, a new report has said.

China leads in 37 of 44 technologies tracked in a year-long project by thinktank the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. The fields include electric batteries, hypersonics and advanced radio-frequency communications such as 5G and 6G.

The report, published on Thursday, said the US was the leader in just the remaining seven technologies such as vaccines, quantum computing and space launch systems.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
More detailed version, Xi also mentioned the US directly and accused it of waging a full scale containment and suppression.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Xi aims at US
In a rare direct criticism, Chinese President Xi Jinping took aim at the United States in a panel discussion during the annual gathering of the top advisory body on Monday, according to state news agency Xinhua.

Xi said China had been grappling with “comprehensive containment and suppression by Western countries led by the US over the past few years”.

He said it had brought unprecedented and severe challenges for China’s development and the risks facing China in the future would be more severe and common.


Qin Gang:
  • Qin says China has not supplied weapons to Russia
  • Qin takes aim at the US for a series of global problems. He says there seems to be an “invisible hand” pushing to escalate the crisis in Ukraine; US interest rate rises are triggering debt crises; and the region does not need an Asia-Pacific version of Nato
  • The deterioration of China-US relations has to be stopped, he says. If the US does not “hit the brakes, and continues on the wrong path, there will surely be conflict and confrontation”.
  • Qin is conciliatory on Europe, saying China will keep supporting “European integration”. He hopes Europe will truly achieve “strategic autonomy” and “long-term security and stability” after the ordeal of the war in Ukraine
    • He talks up China’s ties with Russia, saying they “set a good example for international relations”
    • Hinting at more currency cooperation with Russia, Qin says China will use whatever currency is “efficient, safe and credible”
    • The third belt and road forum will be held this year
    • China and Japan “are close neighbours” and need each other, he says
    • Defending Chinese diplomats, Qin says the idea of “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy is a narrative trap




Qin Gang:
To the US on Taiwan
Qin says the US needs to explain its plan for “the destruction of Taiwan”.
He was referring to comments by Garland Nixon, an American radio programme host, who, quoting a White House insider, said last month that US President Joe Biden had a plan to destroy Taiwan.

“Why can the United States talk about sovereignty and territorial integrity over Ukraine, but does not respect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity over Taiwan?”

He asks why the US prevents other countries from supplying weapons to Russia while the US arms Taiwan.
If the Taiwan question cannot be handled well, it will shake the very foundation of China-US relations, Qin says.

Qin blames the US for creating a diplomatic crisis with the spy balloon saga.

He says the US also agreed it was an accident that did not pose a national security threat, but Washington nonetheless violated international law and practices and abused force.

In a fierce attack against the Biden administration’s alliance-focused China strategy, Qin says the US perception of China is seriously distorted.
The US claims of competition with China are meant to contain and suppress China in all respects and push bilateral ties to a zero-sum game.

Belt and Road Initiative
Qin says the third belt and road forum will be held this year.
He says the Belt and Road Initiative is a high-quality and sustainable public project.

Rare direct criticism lol. That’s because some meat heads can’t take a hint unless it is a Gordon Ramsay style chewout.
 
Last edited:
Top