Miscellaneous News

O

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
zbb said:
A small clarification:

Burning is the absolute worst choice for people and the environment because it turns a rapidly dissipating toxin into a permanent one, then creates a convection blower that distributes the toxic byproducts wherever the wind blows.

Burning is the absolute best choice for the bottom line of the railroad company because it gets rid of the vinyl chloride faster and allows the rail line to re-open sooner.
Click to expand...
Not an expert but just from my common sense, isn't burning usually the worst thing you can do? I mean if its on the ground, any toxic element, at least you know where it is. You can evacuate and do whatever you have to do to clean it. But if you burn it, gg.it gets airborne, gets into your lungs, spread with wind etc

If I am a normal guy and see a strange chemical on the wild, I ain't going to burn it. I will just turn around and leave. This seems like the safest approach, don't touch or interact with it in any way
 
siegecrossbow

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Overbom said:
Not an expert but just from my common sense, isn't burning usually the worst thing you can do? I mean if its on the ground, any toxic element, at least you know where it is. You can evacuate and do whatever you have to do to clean it. But if you burn it, gg.it gets airborne, gets into your lungs, spread with wind etc

If I am a normal guy and see a strange chemical on the wild, I ain't going to burn it. I will just turn around and leave. This seems like the safest approach, don't touch or interact with it in any way
Click to expand...

From what I've read Norfolk needed the railroad open asap so they can move rail traffic through the town.

BoraTas said:
There is no cover up guys. Only totalitarian communist dictatorships do that.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625295747125223425
Click to expand...

What's the friggin point of coverup when there is a Mount Doom sized fire belching so much toxic smoke into the air that people could literally see it from space?
 
Z

zbb

Junior Member
Registered Member
Overbom said:
Not an expert but just from my common sense, isn't burning usually the worst thing you can do? I mean if its on the ground, any toxic element, at least you know where it is. You can evacuate and do whatever you have to do to clean it. But if you burn it, gg.it gets airborne, gets into your lungs, spread with wind etc

If I am a normal guy and see a strange chemical on the wild, I ain't going to burn it. I will just turn around and leave. This seems like the safest approach, don't touch or interact with it in any way
Click to expand...
That's only if you think like a f*cking evil commie. Any good capitalist would prioritize putting revenue generating assets back into operation over trivial matters like the health and safety of people and the environment.
/s
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
siegecrossbow said:
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/111bvg7
View attachment 107262
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/111bvg7/_/j8duthv

View attachment 107263
Click to expand...

Strangelove said:
This photo perfectly encapsulates the United States of Amerikkka right now.... it's a complete train wreak.


View attachment 107264
Click to expand...
Surely this Chernobyl level disaster was worth it just for America to also have its own openly homosexual “mayor pete” as head of transportation and currently on maternity leave for his adopted babies with his homosexual partner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top