I am not on the side of the aggressor. But I point out the victim's mistake in continuingBy your logic, everybody including US is a shame. When did the US retaliation come after its embassy employees were taken hostage in Tehran? I don't remember any retaliation that was specifically counted for the crisis.
The alternative is what? Airbus? And you think that is less shame? After US walked away from the nuclear deal, EU acted like a pimp to press Iran to give in Trump's new demand instead of standing on its commitment to the deal. Russian and Chinese aircraft aren't available yet.
For the pride, you would have stopped using all electronics because they more or less have US products in them.
US is selling weapons to a Chinese province. EU knows who bombed their pipe line. Germany, SK and Japan are still occupied by US forces. These are much bigger countries, let alone smaller ones.
Lastly but most importantly why being so harsh on the victims than on the aggressor?
to be beaten and does nothing to get rid of the humiliation and dependence.
The US killed top Iranian military officials with impunity, with Iran reacting by warning it would fire on an emptied base with no consequences to enemy morale. It's just weak.
And about planes, even Russia today has several models (TU-214, SSJ-New, MS-21) that are more modern and more reliable than the old scrap fleet without replacement and safety criteria that Iran maintains and does not even make an effort to renew. But iranians prostrates himself to try for a contract with Boeing and Airbus, which increasingly despise Iran treated like trash.
A victim who continues to depend on the aggressor even after so much time of beatings and does not change is because he does not want to and cannot evolve and will let the aggressor humiliate forever.
This kind of attitude cannot be approved. As long as thoughts you justify here continue to exist, the US will continue to dominate the world, stealing resources and talent and stepping on everyone they need to trample.