isn't this the way they begin to form a nato-style agreement though? you start small and then increase its scope afterwards
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
The way China is building up right now, it will not matter.
US is a federation empire, like the USSR. There are core territories and peripheral territories, such as Japan or Saudi for US and for USSR, Poland or Ukraine SSR.
China is not expecting to not fight any of the oligarchy's co-republics, it is a good bonus if they separate and betray the core territory's interest, but the principle manner in which the cold war is won is by surpassing all American subordinates, together, and then isolating them into uselessness. Naturally as that happens, some will rebel, hastening the process. But any smart planner wouldn't gamble the whole war on defections.
That is why, even after gaining a fair bit larger economy than America, China is still targeting further growth, further technological advances, diplomatic plays to hit NATO economies where it hurts and so on.
supercat
Major
Well, even Walter Disney Company has a Global Intelligence and Threat Analysis department with a former CIA agent as its director. Just imagine what google, Facebook, and Twitter have, and what the U.S. spy agencies want to do to TikTok.
I hope there won't be a "color revolution" in Brazil.
Last edited:
Well, the supporters of Lula ought to come out and do their own counter protest to show their country and the world that Bolsonaros supporters don't represent the majority otherwise the battle of narrative will be on the Bolsonaro supporters
I wouldn’t say it’s impossible but is it worth the consequences and the expense put into it. The thing is that regime change in the West isn’t going to have the same impact as some random Eastern European, African, or whatever. It will throw the global financial system and economy into total turmoil, which is obviously not in China interests. Just take a look at the economic and political turmoil the West is facing after trying to force a regime change in Russia.
Useless, Anglo settler colonies are irredeemable by nature. Plus, anglo methods should be avoided wherever possible.
That depends on the timeline and capability as most reactions are centered around what are already known as facts, more or less, and what it used to be viv-a-vis China, ie, today and in the recent memory. Vietnam didn't have much respect, if any, for China, at least militarily, back when China was about to start the opening. Not any more. That is the outcome of timeline and capability.
Western system are ossified now, and the elites seem to not care about necessary changes. Clearly, there are a lot of discontent. It may be cheaper that way to handle or manage future relations when conditions favor it, or at least it would be an another option.
Careful now, how is the AUKUS gonna get their Indian sepoy cannon fodder against China if they don’t continue to flatter Indians?
That’ll put a dent in the ahem “Indian influence operations” on twitter, namely the harassment and downvotes by hordes of Indians. Back in 2020, during Galwan, Indians working inside twitter were actively promoting BJP cells and tweets againsr Chinal
Regime change from Anglo geopolitical perspective is less about actual regime change and more about creating chaos for the sake of control and above all, profit. The cia would much rather have Pakistan for eg in a constitutional crisis than actually have Pakistan as an ally because it serves Anglo interests in arresting BRI, the anglos would much rather Latin America under constant threat by cia armed and trained cartels and right wing death squads than a peaceful, developing neighbou.
Don't worry, FLG has that covered. See their involvement in January 6th