Yeah, something isn’t right with these people. I thought inflation and the breaking down national grid is supposed to be the more important issue, not this style of living that seems to trying and normalise the whole Emma and two moms thing as what the future of humanity should be
I.e. we have to spoon-feed little Habeck some basic economics 101 because the guy is a children books author and has no qualification whatsoever being an economics ministerHabeck promised to continue the dialogue with the business community and another meeting has been arranged for the first quarter next year, the two people said.
"He has a steep learning curve, he is very open," one of them said. "The problem is that he is starting right at the bottom."
The economy ministry declined to comment when asked about a meeting next year, or the remarks about Habeck.
Question: LGBT is said to be genetic at least in part. LGBT also do not genetically reproduce so the rate of genetic appearance depends solely on the existing gene frequency in the general population, and is independent of existing LGBT population.
Question: LGBT is said to be genetic at least in part. LGBT also do not genetically reproduce so the rate of genetic appearance depends solely on the existing gene frequency in the general population, and is independent of existing LGBT population.
If there is no major genetic shift in the US within last 20 years, how can LGBT population increase if it is indeed genetic?
The tall Arab standing next to Putin is Emir of Qatar.
That study is looking evidence to support conclusions it has already come to. Pretty much how a lot of "science" in the west today operates.Question: LGBT is said to be genetic at least in part. LGBT also do not genetically reproduce so the rate of genetic appearance depends solely on the existing gene frequency in the general population, and is independent of existing LGBT population.
If there is no major genetic shift in the US within last 20 years, how can LGBT population increase if it is indeed genetic?
1% growth and significantly less atractive stock markets. After debt and consumerism bonanza of the last 40 years they can't increase interest rates.Anybody can shed some light on what is the long term consequence of high interest rate (say >4%) for US economy ?