Miscellaneous News

supercat

Major
What's happening in Sri Lanka right now is just part 2 of Ukraine 2014/Hong Kong 2019-2020


It may well be another "color revolution".

McConnell just handed the U.S. a double whammy: higher prescription drug costs and less government funding for semiconductor research.

AIIB is expanding, so much for G7's $600 billion whatever.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Boeing threatens to cancel Boeing 737 MAX 10 aircraft unless given exemption from safety requirements​

Aircraft manufacturer Boeing has suggested it could pull the latest model of its 737 MAX, currently in the process of getting its certification, unless it is made exempt from certain safety regulations which come into force in 2023.

More than 600 of the 737 MAX 10, the highest capacity version of this aircraft type, have been ordered by airlines worldwide.

However, there’s a snag - from next year, new aviation regulations are being introduced in the US.

In 2020, Congress passed the Aircraft Safety and Certification Reform Act, stipulating that new planes must comply with the latest crew alert regulations mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in order to be certified from 2023 onwards.

The 737 MAX range doesn’t include this technology, as it’s based on an aircraft first designed in the 1960s, reports One Mile at a Time.

If the MAX 10 misses the 2022 cut-off for certification, its flight deck would have to be fitted with new safety technology, raising costs and requiring further training for pilots.

The latter requirement would be particularly detrimental, as one of the jet’s biggest draws is that it can be flown by pilots familiar with the 737 without extra training.

In response, Boeing’s CEO, David Calhoun, hinted that the entire project could be pulled if the aircraft isn’t made exempt from the new rules or given an extension until they come into force.

Truly an American Company. Leading by example. Big Pharma and narcotics when?
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
What's happening in Sri Lanka right now is just part 2 of Ukraine 2014/Hong Kong 2019-2020


It may well be another "color revolution".

McConnell just handed the U.S. a double whammy: higher prescription drug costs and less government funding for semiconductor research.

AIIB is expanding, so much for G7's $600 billion whatever.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

As someone previously mentioned. China needs to spend more on intelligence, what's the point of good will if it's easily hijacked
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
We live in weird times

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

@daifo Don’t worry. It’s just got weirder.

It’s the god damn moonies again but this time with Abe. Lmao.

The name of the religious group "Unification Church" stated by Tetsuya Yamagami, who shot former Prime Minister Abe.

It has been reported that Yamagami said, "I tried to aim for a member of a religious group, but I thought it would be difficult, so I aimed for former Prime Minister Abe."

Yamagami stated , "I aimed to know that my mother was a believer in the Unification Church and Shinzo Abe was close to the Unification Church ."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Unification Church" Statement on the Assassination of Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

Prime Minister Abe was a globally respected statesman of Japan and active in building peace in Asia, a subject close to the heart of our organization. Mr. Abe often spoke of the need to value freedom and democracy and believe in the hope that such values will bring.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Many social media users are filling in the blanks and guessing: one of the trending terms on Twitter in Japan is "Unification Church" - the name of a religious organization founded in Korea that had its Nara branch at the station where Abe was shot.

 
Last edited:

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
I don’t see why China should intervene. They own like 10% of their debt which means if China bails them out then that money would go to repaying others. Who have a significantly higher share of the debt than China and Western lenders can demand to take the Chinese money. It would just become an endless money pit since it doesn’t solve why they were in the rat hole in the first place.
 
Top