Miscellaneous News

Appix said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1511889334055677955

Click to expand...

So... these bunch of buffoons, clowns and monkeys of the US-led NATO-&-Partners-Co. are so eager to cause a Cold War 2.0, huh?

So... they want to treat China like how they treat the Soviet Union during Cold War 1.0, huh?

However, whether these bunch of buffoons, clowns and monkeys don't know, or choose to ignore, is that - China is NOT the Soviet Union.

Let's take the most simple example - The national flags of China and the Soviet Union.




Yes, both the national flags of China and the Soviet Union are of Red Colour.

However, the most vital difference between the two national flags- the bright Red Colour of the Five Star Red Flag of China is NOT a mere symbolism of "Communism" and "Socialism" - The bright Red Colour of the Five Star Red Flag of China represents the very elements and spirit which formulate the Chinese people and the Chinese diasphora.

Red colour and the Chinese people has been closely knited with each other for thousands of years (just look at how Red the sceneries of places across the world with significant Chinese population has become whenever Chinese/Lunar New year is around, for example). In fact, the Red colour has become part and parcel of the Chinese identity for a very long, long time.

Yet, seems like this kind of relation has never been understood by the bunch of buffoons, clowns and monkeys that constitute the US-led NATO-&-Partners-Co.

Perhaps, these bunch of buffoons, clowns and monkeys will finally learn when they get their head smashed, get their bodies bloodied, and get their skulls shattered against the wall of 1.4 billion Chinese people.

deleted

Appix said:

Very good article. I also respect the writer. This is respectful criticism and we can learn a lot from it.

Click to expand...

This article is retarded, written by a US propaganda front no doubt. CPEC is China's core interest, China would be willing to stage a soft coup to ensure its core interests are protected. CPEC is not something Pakistan can cancel on a dime without China's permission, especially since China is now good friends with the middle east.

Appix said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1511889334055677955

Click to expand...

Are they getting a little bit too excited to execute their plans? You pass these bills moments after China attacks, not before they do. Big dummies.

Well congrats, even if the bill doesn't pass, the CPC would have read that bill and prepare beforehand by slowly doing capital flight (or they already have since the treasury yields have been rising, which in this case, accelerate the speed of capital flight), and if the bill passes, capital flight would ensue, which makes Xi happy either way.

Appix said:

Very good article. I also respect the writer. This is respectful criticism and we can learn a lot from it.

Click to expand...

it's a regurgitation of Anglo talking points.

So, it was false :

Likewise,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

for potential military help lacked hard evidence, a European official and two U.S. officials said.

The U.S. officials said there are no indications China is considering providing weapons to Russia. The Biden administration put that out as a warning to China not to do so, they said.

The European official described the disclosure as “a public game to prevent any military support from China.”

coolgod said:

This article is retarded, written by a US propaganda front no doubt. CPEC is China's core interest, China would be willing to stage a soft coup to ensure its core interests are protected. CPEC is not something Pakistan can cancel on a dime without China's permission, especially since China is now good friends with the middle east.

Click to expand...

"the United States wanted to create a world order which is designed to benefit both the United States and its allies. China it seems, by contrast, wants to build a world order where China’s needs are met first and foremost, and the rest of the world’s needs — including those of its allies — are at best secondary considerations"

Click to expand...

Edit: I don't have to explain this do I?

escobar said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

Why are you posting an article from 2019?

Appix said:

Very good article. I also respect the writer. This is respectful criticism and we can learn a lot from it.

Click to expand...

No, it isn't even a passable article. It figures that you would respect the writer, but that shouldn't be the case for anyone else here. This isn't respectful criticism, it's American disinformation and the only thing we can learn from it is the orientations of those who promote it.

I was wondering when Israel would call China up . The video also said Israel and China free trade deal, this was not mentioned in the news text but mentioned in a separate news text.

Coalescence said:

View attachment 86652
Edit: I don't have to explain this do I?

Click to expand...

Check out that piece of work's LinkedIn and note that this is him being professional: