Here is a long research article on what is essentially the long standing U.S. policy on China. The Americans in my opinion based on this research declassified paper clearly shows the Supreme arrogance of the American mindset and the racist element that has guided much of their strategic thinking and views on China.
Losing China? Truman’s Nationalist Beliefs and the American Strategic Approach to China, 1948–1949
Truman's nationalist beliefs and the American support to anti-CCP forces in mainland China
Truman’s nationalist beliefs: the domestic and foreign policy dimensions
Truman’s attitude towards the American national community can be traced in the 33rd president’s claims of commitment towards the wellbeing of the nation as well as his loyalty and attachment to the American community revealed in expressions of personal responsibility for the national constituency. In particular, Truman self-identified with and claimed to represent the whole nation: since he ‘came to be elected by the whole people, he became responsible to the whole people. It is the President’s responsibility to look at all questions from the point of view of the whole people’.31 At the same time, accepting the existence of a public interest and elevating the national interest above any special interest or partisan views was key to a correct interpretation of the functions required by the presidency, and a core characteristic of Truman’s nationalist beliefs.32
Truman acknowledged his commitment to the American public in a speech in Raleigh, North Carolina, where—praising previous Democratic presidents like Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, and Andrew Johnson—said that each of them ‘did [their] duty as President of the whole nation against the forces of pressure and persuasion which sought to make him act as a representative of a part of the nation only’.33 Truman believed that the American ‘economic system should rest on a democratic foundation and that wealth should be created for the benefit of all’.34 Since the ‘prosperity of [the American] Nation is indivisible. We cannot get prosperity for just a few’.35 Acting as a representative for each American citizen, Truman perceived himself as the ‘guardian’ of the national community: as such, he had to be ready to lead the country on the basis of his own evaluation of the best policy on behalf of the American people, and in order to favour the American national interest.36...
