Miscellaneous News

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
View attachment 80062View attachment 80063View attachment 80064
A few typical responses to the recent news. Every last leader of the CPC would be wise to aware themselves of the untamed rabidness and rampant, near universal thirst for Chinese blood in America.
Hmmmm I guess one day, the same courtesy should be shown in kind. Note that these people mostly say these things because they have never been harmed before in the same manner that those in the Middle East have suffered. Once the same horrors in the Middle East comes full force in the USA, it will be the kind of shock that will break these entitled little bastards and it will be an unending hell that will be forced onto this nation forever. And unlike the Middle East, no one will show enough sympathy to risk nuclear destruction to save these trash
 
Last edited:

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
You are overthinking this.

This looks like an engineering design flaw.

If the bridge managers cannot control traffic and bridge is expected to support load up to 200 tons or more over its lifetime, the bridge should be designed under all expected circumstance to support the maximum load plus additional tolerance. There is no other way to reasonably prevent such preventable accident.

Also delaying the disaster by one year or two is not the goal. It will just always be another accident waiting to happen, The goal is to reasonably anticipate the expected load and eliminate such preventable accidents from happening over the lifetime of the bridge.

This does not mean that a bridge has to be design to withstand a direct nuclear explosion as that is not what the design goal is.

THis looks like a preventable accident with proper design and/or traffic control.

JUst to add context. The Ministry of Transport spokeperson is unlikely to find fault on the design of a bridge that they should be regulating, reviewing the design and approve.

if someone drives a 30 tons truck over a bridge designed for 10, is it the engineers’ fault

my favourite quote:

“Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.”​


― Rick Cook,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Hit back when criticised on human rights’: Xi to officials

•New book includes 2014 speech to party leaders instructing them how to respond to criticism from Western countries
•Publication coincides with latest clash on values between Beijing and the West with competing virtual summit

Chinese officials should “resolutely hit back” whenever confronted by the West on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, President Xi Jinping instructed China’s ruling elite in 2014, a new book has revealed.
In a February meeting that year, just 11 months into his first term as state president, Xi told about 170 ministerial-level officials that there were plenty of problems in the West.
“When Western leaders talked to me about human rights, I always said there’s no such a thing as best human rights, only better human rights,” he said.
“By saying that, I mean of course China’s human rights need development but you also have lots of problems on human rights, too.”


Xi said that, regardless of China’s development progress, its human rights conditions only had to meet the country’s own standards, not the West’s.

We are good as long as we meet China’s own standards, and we don’t need to look to the standards of the West or care about how they judge us. Facing Western countries’ finger-pointing over China’s human rights, [we] must resolutely hit back!”

The remarks – from a speech at the opening of a five-day study session at the Central Party School on February 17, 2014, were made public in a book released early this month, titled Collected Remarks by Xi Jinping on Respecting and Protecting Human Rights.
The book included a quote by Xi from a 2013 meeting that sums up his vision of human rights: “Development is the key to solving all our country’s problems.”


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
SCMP article dated, Dec. 18,2021
 
if someone drives a 30 tons truck over a bridge designed for 10, is it the engineers’ fault

my favourite quote:

“Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.”​


― Rick Cook,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If there is no effective control and means to prevent someone from driving a 30 ton truck to a bridge designed for 10, then it is a design fault for failing to design a reasonable and effective control. Otherwise, the new bridge should have been designed for 30 ton.

In this case, it could have saved 3 lives.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
If there is no effective control and means to prevent someone from driving a 30 ton truck to a bridge designed for 10, then it is a design fault for failing to design a reasonable and effective control. Otherwise, the new bridge should have been designed for 30 ton.

In this case, it could have saved 3 lives.
You can't prevent a London double decker bus driver from driving into a London multistorey car park and killing all on level two of the bus can you?
 
Top