A quick rant again, because want to mention this.
American wars have a tendency to expand.
In Vietnam, it started off with advisors. Then more military advisors training the army. Then US troops arrived. At the height of the fighting, the Americans had over 500,000 US troops in South Vietnam.
What started off as a few advisors, escalated to half a million US troops, later the bombing of Cambodia, and Laos.
The same pattern was observed in the Middle East. Iraq. Then it morphed into Syria (remember that) and even Yemen, via proxies.
The US government wanted to stop Huawei 5G from embedding itself into Western networks of allied nations.
That has gone global, and a full scale tech decoupling is in the cards between the United States and China.
How did a fabricated dispute between the US government and Huawei, lead to a global tech decoupling?
American wars have a tendency to expand.
What makes this kind of interesting, is that Huawei 5G is global. The vast majority of nations on the globe want that.
What does that mean for the United States where it adamantly refuses to have anything to do with Huawei? Should we expect a tech decoupling or some other sort of decoupling in those cases?
If Huawei is doing something in Mexico, then by US law, Micro$oft could be forbidden from working that project. The US government do not want people working with Huawei, but Huawei is everywhere.
How far will this US decoupling go?
We do not know.
The Americans do not even know what they are going to do.
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()