Oooh I lauged when he put his entire family in danger when he went on a racist tirade against Asians on social networks.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Ah, they have a G7 foreign ministers conference this weekend. Surely we all know what this global white supremacism cartel and their yellow stooge will talk about.
Kinda funny seeing them talk about the SCS when the whole world knows that China can sink anything that is there
Anyway, they got bigger issues to worry about. Putin and their failing economies which have high inflation
This is actually a very bad move for US, it's causing terrible damage to people's faith in US giving protection to those it promises.
So US has long promised to shield Taiwan from reunification. Is it sending troops? No. Is it selling ROC weapons that might actually matter in a forced reunification (say F-35)? No. All it's doing is selling obsolete junk at inflated prices to ROC, and we can clearly see the pace of it ramp up as we approach end game.
So if US promise ROC protection but instead is only interested in using them as an ATM, what does that say about the value of a promise from the US?
EPR was made after decades of mostly stagnant French nuclear reactor orders. A lot of the people who worked on the reactor projects have since long retired. Lots of institutional knowledge was lost.
The Olkiluoto EPR nuclear reactor project in Finland has been nothing but an unmitigated disaster. It is supposed to finally begin operations in February 2022. Construction began in 2005. That is 17 years to build a nuclear reactor.
You are trolling. Please explain to me how the Yars or Bulava missiles were either designed or produced in the Soviet Union.
Compare that with the US which is still using the Minuteman and Trident.
Same thing with regards to strategic nuclear submarines. Russia is operating the 2nd generation Borei-A SSBN while the US still uses the Ohio.
Russia reserves itself the right to use nuclear weapons in case of NATO invasion of Russia. That alone is enough to guarantee NATO won't invade Russia. But Russia also has a huge conventional army much larger than any single NATO nation. You could argue they have a vulnerability in regards to their air force. But even there it is much larger and more modern than any other Western European NATO nation. Plus if they have to fight inside the Russian IADS bubble any NATO offensive would stall quite quickly.
I think it is completely nutz brother.
Remember the Vietnam War, and the Americans were saying stuff like, "We had to burn down the village, to save the village."
They had to burn down the village to save it from communism. Since they destroyed the village, the village was saved from communism.
We cannot make this stuff up.
So now they are saying that they must keep the sea lanes open in the South China Sea, where most of China trade is shipped to and from ASEAN.
China and ASEAN probably be each other's largest trading partner by quite a bit in 20 years. Here we have the Western powers insisting they have to keep the sea lanes open for that.
Might as well burn down that village again. After all, that is how they won the Vietnam War.
These people though;does China intend to block the sea lanes?