Miscellaneous News

Appix

Senior Member
Registered Member
With the full support of the FUWL board of directors, I am announcing the immediate withdrawal of all FUWL participation in WTA tournaments!

God what a fucking blowhard.

But yea, this is kinda what China's missing when you come to this propaganda. The west exaggerates China's missteps and downplays their own atrocities. We know this. We always see the two levels of standards - if this was equal, both FINA and World Gymnastics would've pulled out of the US long ago for their systematic rape of their young women in the US programs.

If China has any capability in under-handedness, they'd start tying this guy Steve Simon to Epstein. Of course, it needs to come from a third party (or perceived third party, this is why the US's vassals are useful) but of course China's too honorable to do so.

You should read those two articles from Chandran Nair which delves deeper in global white privilege.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member

More U.S. bases in Southeast Asia would add flexibility: army chief​

a2a8f5844c218150c0349a4c91298b72ae83fec0.webp


The U.S. military seeks opportunities to expand its presence in Southeast Asia, the army's top civilian said Wednesday.

"The United States' military footprint in the theater has been heavily oriented towards the northeast part of the region," Army Secretary Christine Wormuth told the Washington think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies in a webinar, speaking about the U.S. military's Indo-Pacific posture. "And I think there is very much a desire to be able to expand our access and basing arrangements more into Southeast Asia, because if we were able to do that, we would have a more dispersed posture that would give us much more flexibility."

"Looking forward, it is very much in our interests and in the interest of our allies and partners to explore how we can shift that posture over time," she said.

But she was quick to add, "We need to be realistic about what is possible and as we look at the operational challenges, we need to have realistic assumptions about the locations from where we might be able to operate."

Wormuth's comments reflected both the wishes of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, which has called for a more dispersed posture in the Indo-Pacific to counter China's increased activities, and the difficulties the administration of President Joe Biden has faced in convincing allies and partners in the region to host more American troops.

In the just-released declassified portion of the U.S. Department of Defense's Global Posture Review, there was little mention of new basing arrangements. When Biden announced the posture review in February, he had said America's military footprint needed to be "appropriately aligned with our foreign policy and national security priorities.

Wormuth said the U.S. Army's immediate focus in the Global Posture Review would be to bolster existing bases in the Indo-Pacific.

"For us, an important part of the Global Posture Review is to think about where we can increase opportunities and positioning of equipment and stocks. That is something that we will be looking at, looking at ways to put more into the region, to use our already pre-positioned assets in the region that are there more efficiently, so that we can get more bang for our buck," she said.

Wormuth said the expansion of basing arrangements in Southeast Asia will depend on negotiations led by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the State Department.

"It was very important that Secretary [Lloyd] Austin was able to make as much progress as he did with the Philippines and the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement. We will be taking cues from that kind of diplomatic talks that [the Department of Defense] and State have," she said.

One of the U.S. Army's priorities in the Indo-Pacific is deploying ground-based, long-range missiles, including "long-range hypersonic weapons, midrange capability and precision strike missiles, all of which we will begin building in [fiscal year] '23," Wormuth said. "We will be able to interdict fires across the sea lines of communication, suppress enemy air defenses and provide counter fires against mobile targets."

Initially, those missiles are more likely to be fielded on U.S. territory, she said. But she added, "Certainly, those are the kinds of capabilities that we will be discussing with close allies and partners."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Can you imagine China saying

More Chinese bases in Cuba would add flexibility

US acting like Southeast Asia is in its own backyard and which belongs to USA

And of course SEA will pay for the US bases just like S Korea and Japan pay for US bases
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Can you imagine China saying

More Chinese bases in Cuba would add flexibility

US acting like Southeast Asia is in its own backyard and which belongs to USA

And of course SEA will pay for the US bases just like S Korea and Japan pay for US bases
@Crang bro you see the US had nothing to offer, by creating instability in the region you create a situation or a market. We had seen through and experience it so we're not interested.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
No, IMO either through the shit back like "how do you prove that you are telling any truth?" or no response ever. The stupidity is his trying to prove "China's innocence", by doing so he lend the accuser who has no evidence some credence.

From my childhood experience, facing such word bullying, one either walk away, or punch the bully right to the face, because even the bystander is not interested in the truth but happy to see how the fight goes, anybody stand by principle and truth would have raised their voice equally to the bully as to the accused. Yet, we did not see any such equal treatment in this farce, didn't we?

Addition:
One thing that I see is critical is that when facing a question/statement/accusation, the very first thing to do is not answering it, but to question the validity of that "question/statement/accusation", attack the very root/foundation/standing-point of the opponent. Shifting the burden of proof to the accuser is a common legal practice.
What China needs is a few Western trained spin docters.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
@Crang bro you see the US had nothing to offer, by creating instability in the region you create a situation or a market. We had seen through and experience it so we're not interested.
Thats why there is trouble being stirred up in the Solomons. Close enough to China but out of range of most conventional missiles.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Thats why there is trouble being stirred up in the Solomons. Close enough to China but out of range of most conventional missiles.
@B.I.B. bro what matter to China is ASEAN, collectively as a whole its a large market, a neighbor and proximity count. Sorry for Kiwi's and Ozzie's members here but NZ, Australia and the Pacific nation is a nice to have rather than an important partners. With Australian hostile behavior by decoupling it had shown that China can live without them and the Australian can't. It nullify its importance in the region thus the only recourse is to join the US coattails.
 
Top