It's SHOWTIME FOR THE M.I.C.
It's SHOWTIME FOR THE M.I.C.
Chas Freeman unfortunately is getting canceled by neocons and think tankie, at least on Twitter.Rumours about what may be announced during the Biden-Xi virtual meeting. Very interesting
The US complies with the 2 demand-lists given to the US in the summer.
Hahahaha!! If the propaganda media Politico admits that China is in a position of strength, then the US must be in deep deep sht now
Good luck giving any sort of military aid (military financing doesn't count), especially in the billions, to any place with a per capita GDP of over $25,000
Good luck giving any sort of military aid (military financing doesn't count), especially in the billions, to any place with a per capita GDP of over $25,000
Israel at least spends something like 5% of its GDP on defense.Israel.
Israel at least spends something like 5% of its GDP on defense.
The US is doing the classical Anglo-Saxon offshore balancing. Though difference the difference this time is China's neighbors are a lot less problematic compared to France, Germany and Russia. There is no state in the Chinese neighborhood that can challenge China with the exception of Japan. India is behind the Himalayas and is simply dysfunctional, and Russia (despite all the bullshit think tankies are pushing) is friendly to China. South Korea is decently powerful but has problems with Japan and has no real problems with China. Australia is 6000 km away and has an economy smaller than 2 of Chinese provinces. I would rather see the USA spending that $2 on the Taiwanese military rather than its own military. That $2 billion would generate a lot more additional firepower in the hands of the US military.Good luck giving any sort of military aid (military financing doesn't count), especially in the billions, to any place with a per capita GDP of over $25,000
The US is going for an arms race but in a roundabout way. It will try to feed its puppets defence budget to its own military programs so that it can challenge China with other countries' moneyThe US is doing the classical Anglo-Saxon offshore balancing. Though difference the difference this time is China's neighbors are a lot less problematic compared to France, Germany and Russia. There is no state in the Chinese neighborhood that can challenge China with the exception of Japan. India is behind the Himalayas and is simply dysfunctional, and Russia (despite all the bullshit think tankies are pushing) is friendly to China. South Korea is decently powerful but has problems with Japan and has no real problems with China. Australia is 6000 km away and has an economy smaller than 2 of Chinese provinces. I would rather see the USA spending that $2 on the Taiwanese military rather than its own military. That $2 billion would generate a lot more additional firepower in the hands of the US military.
The US is doing the classical Anglo-Saxon offshore balancing. Though difference the difference this time is China's neighbors are a lot less problematic compared to France, Germany and Russia. There is no state in the Chinese neighborhood that can challenge China with the exception of Japan. India is behind the Himalayas and is simply dysfunctional, and Russia (despite all the bullshit think tankies are pushing) is friendly to China. South Korea is decently powerful but has problems with Japan and has no real problems with China. Australia is 6000 km away and has an economy smaller than 2 of Chinese provinces. I would rather see the USA spending that $2 on the Taiwanese military rather than its own military. That $2 billion would generate a lot more additional firepower in the hands of the US military.