Miscellaneous News

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
How do you propose other nations to acquire more RMB without either reversing their trade deficit with China or exchanging depreciating dollars for RMB? One thing Chinese economists and current US economists agree on is that the absolute last thing you want is for your currency to become a global reserves currency. China wants an alternative to the dollar as the global currency of trade- but it absolutely does not want the RMB to be the replacement.
It's not actually China's official policy to run massive trade surplus, China only do so right now because USD is currently the reserve currency and China needs reserves to maintain financial security against a hostile US.

Oil trade in RMB also doesn't imply China must run a deficit, unlike America China actually makes stuff, you can very much have a world where China makes everything while everyone else sells resources and agricultural products to China in exchange for them. Or they can try competing against Chinese companies in high tech products, China also isn't afraid of competition.

A lot of arguments for why you don't want RMB internationalization is based on the implicit assumption that USD is still the reserve currency and things like oil will still be priced in USD. So to answer your question: countries can aquire more RMBs by selling stuff to oil producing countries who pays them in RMB, RMB they received from China in exchange for oil, hence the utility of pricing oil in RMB.

As for America, they can starve to death for anyone cares.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I think America really lucked out they f*ed up in Iran rather before going against China.
Imagine starting war with China believing China wasn't suppose to bomb Okinawa or Guam.
Or worse, that China wasn't suppose to land troops and occupy those island chain bases America is nice enough to build for China.
I think this is great for China too because although China was always preparing to strike all of America's Asian bases with our DF arsenal, there was always mental apprehension and hesitation to strike a country first before they declare themselves a participant of the war. Iran showed us that there is no place for that hesitation. If all their bases are destroyed, they will ask for peace; if you spare their bases hoping for peace, they will use them for war. No US vassal cares who attacked whom first; they have no sense of right or wrong at all. What everyone cares about is what they can still do to you vs what you can do to them and by starting out striking all US bases in Japan, S Korea, Philippines, etc... China sends the right message that they have nothing left to even hope to do anything to us but we can do anything and everything to the rest of their countries.
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
How do you propose other nations to acquire more RMB without either reversing their trade deficit with China or exchanging depreciating dollars for RMB? One thing Chinese economists and current US economists agree on is that the absolute last thing you want is for your currency to become a global reserves currency. China wants an alternative to the dollar as the global currency of trade- but it absolutely does not want the RMB to be the replacement.

That right there is called putting in ye cart in front of the horse.

You talk about replacing the petrodollar with the petroyuan like it’s the easiest thing in the world and a forgone conclusion, when in reality it will be one of the hardest things to do in isolation, because America and all the vested interests who currently benefit from the status quo will fight like hell to preserve the petrodollar as the most important economic pillar underpinning America wealth and power.

In normal course of events, that’s so far off over the Horizon that China isn’t really seriously actively planning for it yet as in theory, the petrodollar can survive a crushing American military defeat in East Asia and all American influences getting pushed back to Hawaii and beyond.

Because in order to end the petrodollar, you need to exert military control of ME oil. If America played its cards right, it would have made that extremely difficult for China, as a Chinese naval expeditionary forces will need to cross multiple geographic choke points controlled by America and American lackies; many many American regional bases, the USN and potentially having to deal with India as well. All to have extremely long and vulnerable supply lines to secure even if you can win the head on fight against US forces.

The current Iran debacle is an absolute godsend for China, potentially shaving well over a decade off of China’s most optimistic projected timelines.

Yes replacing the petrodollar with the petroyuan will have some downsides, but you are totally ignoring the colossal benefits of firstly financially ruining the US and massively increasing the likelihood of Civil War 2.0; Essentially free oil and gas, default dominance of world finances and transactions. The list is massive.

Once you have the petroyuan, you can easily replace it with a new non-national currency of your choice, and at that point you will have countries lining up and fighting each other to get a piece of the action, and you can write the rules for how this new currency is going to be governed from a position of absolute strength to make sure you get all the benefits and as few of the downsides as possible. That’s a far better deal that China could have ever dreamed of being able to get if it was to try and displace the petrodollar slowly and peacefully. Trump just gave China the gift horse of the millennium, and China is sure as shit not going to turn its nose up at it.

Your complaining is essentially equivalent to moaning about all the extra taxes you will have to pay if you win the lottery jackpot.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ukraine peace talks fizzle out as Trump’s focus shifts to Iran​

The US-led peace process in Ukraine is fizzling out because Donald Trump is losing interest in the talks and his war against Iran is easing pressure on Russia, officials say.

The conflict in the Middle East has diverted Washington’s attention from a peace deal, according to four EU diplomats involved in talks with Ukraine. At the same time, the diplomats said, it was benefiting Russia through higher oil prices, a suspension of US sanctions and the rapid depletion of American munitions Kyiv needed.

The negotiations between Ukrainian and Russian officials, mediated by the US, were “really in the danger zone”, said a senior European official.

“A pause has indeed appeared in the talks. The Americans have other priorities, and that’s understandable,” said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.

The last three-way peace talks took place in Geneva on February 17-18. Another round due to take place on March 5 in Abu Dhabi was postponed because of the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, and a new date and venue have yet to be announced.
“The Middle East has severely reoriented political attention” away from Ukraine, one of the EU diplomats said. “For us, and for Ukraine, it’s a disaster.”

EU countries had been told that US arms shipments, particularly air defence, would be delayed as Washington prioritised Middle Eastern customers, the diplomats said, with major ramifications for Kyiv.

“It is definitely a problem because you have a competition for the same assets really, in the Middle East as well as in Ukraine,” Kaja Kallas, the EU’s chief diplomat, told the FT. “Clearly America’s attention right now is on the Middle East.”

Trump’s war with Iran has given Russia an unexpected lifeline by driving up global energy prices, helping the Kremlin recoup additional revenue of up to $150mn a day. The US relaxed sanctions on Thursday and its pressure on India not to buy Russian oil, prompting a significant number of tankers to head to the Indian Ocean.
Washington’s move “certainly does not help peace”, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Russian President Vladimir Putin had so far largely refrained from criticising Trump over the war, likely in an effort to stop the US from swinging more firmly behind Ukraine, the people involved in back-channel talks said. The two presidents spoke on Monday, when Putin suggested ways Russia could mediate an end to the conflict in the Middle East.

But in the negotiations with Ukraine, the Kremlin has shown no willingness to compromise and has itself become frustrated with the process. “The talks are running out of steam. They need to breathe some new life into this format,” said one of the people involved in back-channel efforts to end the war.

EU leaders are sceptical that peace talks will succeed without further pressure on Moscow. But they see the process as a way of maintaining US engagement in Ukraine.

EU leaders have tried to keep Ukraine in the spotlight since the US-Israeli attack on Iran began two weeks ago. France’s Emmanuel Macron hosted Zelenskyy in Paris on Friday to counter what an Élysée official described as the “eclipse effect” of the Iran war.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited the White House three days after the US and Israel began their attack on Iran. Merz came with maps and charts to make the case for increased pressure on Moscow.

But Trump was disinclined to discuss in detail and remains convinced that Russia is strong and Ukraine is weak, say people familiar with the discussion. There was also no sign of US willingness to dial up pressure on Putin.

Over the past week, US officials told European counterparts that there would be no further sanctions on Russia’s oil industry, two of the EU diplomats said.

“The administration has consistently avoided putting pressure on Moscow and has focused instead on offering incentives to the Kremlin,” said Andrew Weiss, vice-president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“Trump and his team have relied heavily on improvisation in their negotiations with the Kremlin.”

Under Trump, the US has sought to serve as a neutral interlocutor in the talks. US officials were eager to broker an end to the conflict but were largely indifferent as to the terms under which the war was brought to an end, people familiar with the talks said.
A White House official said that Trump remained “hopeful” that the talks would lead to an end of the war, and that US negotiators had made “tremendous progress” in recent months.

“I don’t think the Russians want to have talks anytime soon again,” said one of the people involved in back-channel talks. “Because there’s nothing to talk about.”

Russia has so far resisted entreaties from European countries to carve out a greater role in the talks — most recently last month when French national security adviser Emmanuel Bonne and adviser Bertrand Buchwalter visited Moscow for talks with Yuri Ushakov, Putin’s top foreign policy official.

The French officials made the case for Moscow to accept that Kyiv’s European allies should have a seat at the table, according to people familiar with the matter. “The Russian response from Ushakov was basically, ‘Sorry, actually, no we don’t, fuck you’,” a senior European diplomat said.

Peskov told the FT: “The Europeans don’t want to help the peace process. When the representative of France came, he didn’t bring any positive signals. And so there was indeed nothing positive for him to hear.”

“Unfortunately, the Europeans are spending all their efforts on convincing the Ukrainians to continue the war,” he said. “We are convinced the Europeans are making a mistake from the perspective of their own future.”

Russia was confident it was winning the war, Peskov said. “The dynamic on the front is positive for us. We are advancing and getting closer to achieving our goals, but as President Putin said, we are open to a diplomatic settlement.”

From Ukraine’s perspective, Russia was “not serious” about ending the war given its insistence on demands Kyiv could not accept, said a senior Ukrainian official. The official downplayed concerns that Washington’s focus on Iran would derail the talks with Russia, saying Kyiv would “wait and see” how the situation develops.

“Nothing has changed” in the talks with Russia, said Oleksandr Merezhko, an MP in Zelenskyy’s party. “The obstacles are still the same, Putin has no interest in achieving a result, he’s only interested in negotiations because it allows him to avoid sanctions from Trump.”
The French officials made the case for Moscow to accept that Kyiv’s European allies should have a seat at the table
The Russian response from Ushakov was basically, ‘Sorry, actually, no we don’t, fuck you’,” a senior European diplomat said.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
How do you propose other nations to acquire more RMB without either reversing their trade deficit with China or exchanging depreciating dollars for RMB? One thing Chinese economists and current US economists agree on is that the absolute last thing you want is for your currency to become a global reserves currency. China wants an alternative to the dollar as the global currency of trade- but it absolutely does not want the RMB to be the replacement.
There is a big difference between China's RMB internationalization and Dollar being reserve currency. Any currency is only a representation of what that country produces that is actually needed and consumed by someone. China want RMB to be used to buy Chinese product and service. China does not print any extra RMB paper more than what China provides. On the contrary, USD is over-printed without backing of its own production. Petro dollar is precisely doing that over-printing backed NOT by goods but by US military.

So no, Chinese economy policy makers do not agree with US conterparts in almost every way. Trade deficit is nothing preventing RMB internationalization, it may prevent other's to buy Chinese products but for everything they CAN buy from China, they got to pay with some currency and China want it to be paid in RMB instead of USD. They earn these RMBs by selling something real too. So there is no "fake" money in this loop.

This also means that there won't be anything called "petroyuan" like petrodollar, because RMB is not going to be linked to oil like USD does. RMB is only backed by China's products.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
That right there is called putting in ye cart in front of the horse.

You talk about replacing the petrodollar with the petroyuan like it’s the easiest thing in the world and a forgone conclusion, when in reality it will be one of the hardest things to do in isolation, because America and all the vested interests who currently benefit from the status quo will fight like hell to preserve the petrodollar as the most important economic pillar underpinning America wealth and power.

In normal course of events, that’s so far off over the Horizon that China isn’t really seriously actively planning for it yet as in theory, the petrodollar can survive a crushing American military defeat in East Asia and all American influences getting pushed back to Hawaii and beyond.

Because in order to end the petrodollar, you need to exert military control of ME oil. If America played its cards right, it would have made that extremely difficult for China, as a Chinese naval expeditionary forces will need to cross multiple geographic choke points controlled by America and American lackies; many many American regional bases, the USN and potentially having to deal with India as well. All to have extremely long and vulnerable supply lines to secure even if you can win the head on fight against US forces.

The current Iran debacle is an absolute godsend for China, potentially shaving well over a decade off of China’s most optimistic projected timelines.

Yes replacing the petrodollar with the petroyuan will have some downsides, but you are totally ignoring the colossal benefits of firstly financially ruining the US and massively increasing the likelihood of Civil War 2.0; Essentially free oil and gas, default dominance of world finances and transactions. The list is massive.

Once you have the petroyuan, you can easily replace it with a new non-national currency of your choice, and at that point you will have countries lining up and fighting each other to get a piece of the action, and you can write the rules for how this new currency is going to be governed from a position of absolute strength to make sure you get all the benefits and as few of the downsides as possible. That’s a far better deal that China could have ever dreamed of being able to get if it was to try and displace the petrodollar slowly and peacefully. Trump just gave China the gift horse of the millennium, and China is sure as shit not going to turn its nose up at it.

Your complaining is essentially equivalent to moaning about all the extra taxes you will have to pay if you win the lottery jackpot.


Just one observation related to what you described. The petrodollar is effectively already finished, even without some formal petroyuan system being established.

Because if the GCC countries cannot export energy normally, meaning they can no longer keep propagating the petrodollar system the way they used to, then the whole mechanism is already being nullified in practice - at least temporarily.

And that would have massive consequences for the US, its absurd debt load, its hidden inflation, its stock market bubbles, and the whole fake structure sitting on top of them.

A link in the chain has been broken; it is just that these aftershock effects do not hit all at once. They take a bit of time to settle in and show up fully inside the US.

The only real way that calamity could still be avoided, and this process reversed, is if they have enough brain cells left to accept Iranian terms of surrender now, whatever form that takes, reparations, sanctions relief, GCC tribute, pulling out bases, bringing China and Russia into the whole process, and so on.


 
Top