Here they're trying to figure out how China is moving forward while India is not. You know what they say is a negative from how Gandhi got the British out of India. He taught Indians non-violent protesting. He's praised by the West because he did it through non-violence. Of course when you're the colonialist, you prefer not being violently forced out as compared to what happened to them in China. I'm not saying using violence was the difference that India got wrong. It's because of non-violent protests successfully ousting the British, it was literally the first thing Indians learned to do in protesting everything they didn't like. That's today's Western liberal democracy at work. And what in the West is their excuse they claim why China is moving ahead and gets things done so fast? It's because they don't have the bureaucracy of a democracy holding China back.
Why do you think the West wants developing countries to adopt democracy first before anything else like economic rights? Because they don't want another China on their hands. Democracy is not good starting out from the bottom. Is it because that's what happens naturally or was it because the West knew that would prevent the country from being a threat they can't control? Why does the West want China to adopt democracy? It's not because they care for the Chinese people. It's so they can have influence and control over those in China. Why does the US want American social media companies to have free unrestricted access in China. It's so they can control how Chinese think just like what they're charging what TikTok was doing and what the critics say their own social media companies are doing to the American people for the worst.
Google wanted in on China early on because China had no real domestic competitors. Google knew they could take over China hence why they made the mistake of daring to challenge China. Google is criticized today for doing something they've been doing from the beginning. They were stacking the deck on what results showed up on what people searched. They did it for money hence why businesses called that unfair which is still being fought in the courts today. It's not only businesses. Google controlled what people saw in searches. For China all the first results were pages upon pages of negative articles of China written by Westerners. What could do more damage in China if everything Chinese read about themselves was negative and that was their aim. Same thing going on with AI where American AI is hypocritically biased and politically influenced.
Why doesn't Europe or Japan have their own Google or Facebook or their own competing AI? Is it because that's how the US engineered it? They see it themselves today how they don't have their own competitors to the US as a negative. Why is India any different? Maybe they're behind China because as they like to brag, they're more like the West than China. China is challenging the US in everything. Western allies and India are not. If the US is okay with doing that to their own allies, what would they have done to China? You already see a glimpse of it today where Japan is angry China didn't buy their radioactive fish to eat or how Europe thinks they can demand China give them their EV technology for free while China gets nothing in return. They think everyone else is their slave and they're just suppose to hand all their money over to them because they're the master.