The American ruling class is divided on China, let us arm them so they ignite civil war
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
The American ruling class is divided on China, let us arm them so they ignite civil war
Werent Jr in Hongkong months ago?
Jiang diaries should be taken with a grain of salt because he pretty blamed everyone but himself for his failures despite him not doing anything about Japanese invasion until his OWN generals had to work with the CCP to force him. Asides from sacrificing his best soldiers for PR reasons when the same Western Allies he depended on was secretly supporting Japan until Pearl Harbour. After the Shanghai-Nanjing debacle he pretty did not commit his own forces but rather preserved them leaving the CCP and Warlords to do all the fighting. In terms of corruption within the KMT his wife's family (Mainly his father in-law) was a big part of that corruption but he didn't do shit. The CCP recognize him because he helped established the First United Front in which the CCP became a faction within the KMT until Jiang ruined everything. Christians during the Second Sino Japanese war collaberated with Japan while the Buddhists fought back.
Last edited:
Europe is a great example, because it isn't actually counter factual. Yes, Europe didn't unify the way China did, but that doesn't mean Europeans don't share an identity.
The reality is, they are far closer to each other (and to their colonies) than they are to any other group. Hence the existence of concepts like "white," "European," "Western," etc. When push comes to shove, Europe will tend to unify behind a common banner, and their assimilation processes work best with - and historically assumed - other Europeans. This is why the US called its feud with Russia a "family feud" but its feud with China a "conflict with an entirely [alien] civilization." It's also why European and American leaders are far more okay with being "border less" with other Europeans, than being "border less" with Indians, Africans, Mexicans, etc.
The nature of Western political correctness is that, in polite company, they don't say what they really think. But we all know what they really think. Once you remove the blinding light of liberal ideology, people are indeed quite similar in their common tribalism. Language, race, culture - these are the binding principles of identity. Even within boundaries of entities (like historical empires) that failed to respect these principles, the identities persisted, and in moments of political weakness, they'd rise to the surface in explosions of violence, civil strife, and political disintegration. We've seen it all before.
Last edited:
You can easily tell their intentions by how triggered many white peoples get when foreigners speak their own language in front of them. To you and me, it’s just ppl talking, but to these people they’re conspiring and talking smack, which is indicative of how quickly their dialogue turns into 3rd reich attitudes on race when they feel comfortable around their coethnics. Look at the current young republican travesty going on right now as an example.
considering hegseth mandated the Washington and pentagon press to sign loyalty oaths, I can’t help but feel as though the USG is going to try for world war to reset the board.
....
US senator on an anti-sinoic episode...
Last edited: