Miscellaneous News

siegecrossbow said:

View attachment 162417

Some Chinese lib was bragging about how there is free speech on Twitter when a Wumao dared him to make a post denigrating the “chosen people”. He accepted the dare and posted a sarcastic tweet. Not only was his tweet immediately censored but his Twitter account got permabanned.

Click to expand...

Chinese libs hate him — one weird trick to get self-hating cucks permabanned from Twitter.


I really love this Wumao comment — “I don’t dare espousing Free Palestine sentiments on Twitter because I still need my handle to watch Pron”. Wumaos are so utilitarian.

burritocannon said:

i wouldnt blame it on the dutch, they have to listen to what the us dictates. and this was always a card that was designed to be played. it was a matter of time.

Click to expand...

Everyone has a choice, there’s a reason the Nuremberg defence of “I was just following orders” does not stand and in any case the Dutch and the EU should represent Dutch and EU interest respectively. It is clear they are following neither but rather following US diktat or rather the principle of white supremacy. Either case is odious and should be punished harshly.


This basically rhymes with the enabling act of Nazi germany complete with the Horst wessel Charlie Kirk martyrdom and MAGA as an ideology


how do you climb down from this? How are you supposed to negotiate with someone if you claim they are “not to be trusted”? Bessent is digging himself into a hole

US: We are not involved in this war

Also US: The Ukrainians will go on an offensive when I order them to.

We do not seek to decouple from China, but we will not let a command-and-control economy dictate terms to the United States.

Click to expand...

Oh, and to think China spent so many years helping America decouple, all for nothing.

iewgnem said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1978491062332379384

Oh, and to think China spent so many years helping America decouple, all for nothing.

Click to expand...

Total market penetration, total command, and total control sounds like a great outcome. Alternatively, total decoupling. That'll be painful but that sounds great too.

"The scope and the scale is just unimaginable, and it cannot be implemented," Greer said on Wednesday of China's tightened export controls.

Click to expand...

What happened to that world famous anglo imagination?

So much for white supremacy uber alles. Tucker Carlson and Steve bannon are having haemorrhoids over this. You can hear their screams all the way from 4th avenue.

A potato said:

View attachment 162610
I mean both tried to replace Chinese culture, confucism and buddhism with western culture and Christianity.

Click to expand...

Sun Yat sen's legacy was hotly debated by the KMT throughout the period after his death. The entire left wing of the KMT including his wife Song Qingling and Wang Jingwei (before losing hope in an independent China) argued his political work was principally influenced by progressivism and socialism, and the interpretation of his political work as Confucian values was primarily advanced by the right wing of the KMT like Dai Jitao backed by people like Chiang Kai Shek and Hu Hanmin. Whatever his great-grandson who never knew him says can be taken with a huge grain of salt, especially because nobody advanced this Christian interpretation during his time. In fact throughout the 1920s, KMT leaders including the Christian members advanced anti-Christian rhetoric of missionaries as imperialists, which indirectly encouraged protests and riots to loot and burn many Christian missions. The party also banned foreign missionaries from manging schools etc. Michael G. Murdock (2010). Disarming the Allies of Imperialism: The State, Agitation, and Manipulation during China's Nationalist Revolution, 1922–1929. Cornell University Press. pp. 11–12; Martin Wilbur (1984). The Nationalist Revolution in China, 1923-1928. Cambridge University Press. pp. 70–72; Kaiyi Li (2021). Transnational Education between The League of Nations and China: The Interwar Period. Springer Nature. pp. 17–18

As for Chiang himself, his personal diaries described his understanding of Christianity as simply being a reinforcement of Confucianism, which is why he was able to convert so easily just to marry Song Meiling Taylor, Jay (2009). The Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the struggle for modern China. Harvard University Press. p. 91. If he had believed the Atlanticist propaganda about Confucianism being an archaic ideology that is inferior to Western culture, he would not be Christian in the first place.

Also the CPC doesn't agree with your assessment of Sun Yat sen:

honestly from my impressions jiangjieshi was just a feckless opportunistic comprador. i think he would be happy to say anything, believe anything, as long as it kept him living a life where he got to keep playing with western toys.

Expert1324 said:

LKY put this very well into words in his 1992 speech in HK, where the audience laughed at him when he said that.

Click to expand...

They were laughing at him because the audience agreed exactly with what he was saying.

It is a Chinese thing. Instead of applause, they going to laugh.

Everyone laughing in the audience had the exact same thoughts as Lee Kwan Yiu. Finally, someone had the guts to say it. Say it right in front of Patten's face. That is the way to do it. That is worth a laugh.

But, Lee Kwan Yiu was always saying it, bashing the white people and their attitudes.

It was like his usual punch-lines to the joke, which was transplanting Western beliefs.

Suppose you are a Chinese in Hong Kong, who do not like the white people, saw how democracy lead some places to ruin, then we have this guy Mr. Lee telling it like it is. You going to laugh!

The people cringing in that audience stayed quiet. LOL.