Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1n9fjss
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I saw this news getting traction. I can't be bothered to search up, but I said previously Indians are going to be the scapegoat or the guys who become the face of layoffs and outsourcing in tech. When all is said and done, the so called great Indian CEOs that Jai Hinds are proud of will be the first ones that come to mind. The actual capital holders of Jewish and white elites who gave the go ahead will get away with it and Indians will get lynched on the streets.

On another note, I want to say Reddit is tone deaf saying these Indian CEOs are Trump supporters and agree with his values. Did they forget how they implemented DEI and all those other liberal policies when Biden was in charge? Did they forget the now fired Indian Twitter CEO suppressed right wing views during his tenure? Did they forget Indian Americans tend to vote democratic?

The truth is these Indian CEOs bootlick whoever is in charge. Before it was Biden so they went for all those DEI and ESG policies. Now Trump is in power they are being anti DEI and ESG. Its so shamelessly two faced and lacking in principles. But India is used to serving different rulers including Mughals and Brits so why is this so hard to comprehend?
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1n9fjss
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I saw this news getting traction. I can't be bothered to search up, but I said previously Indians are going to be the scapegoat or the guys who become the face of layoffs and outsourcing in tech. When all is said and done, the so called great Indian CEOs that Jai Hinds are proud of will be the first ones that come to mind. The actual capital holders of Jewish and white elites who gave the go ahead will get away with it and Indians will get lynched on the streets.

On another note, I want to say Reddit is tone deaf saying these Indian CEOs are Trump supporters and agree with his values. Did they forget how they implemented DEI and all those other liberal policies when Biden was in charge? Did they forget the now fired Indian Twitter CEO suppressed right wing views during his tenure? Did they forget Indian Americans tend to vote democratic?

The truth is these Indian CEOs bootlick whoever is in charge. Before it was Biden so they went for all those DEI and ESG policies. Now Trump is in power they are being anti DEI and ESG. It’s so shamelessly two faced and lacking in principles. But India is used to serving different rulers including Mughals and Brits so why is this so hard to comprehend?

Personally I can’t wait for Zuckerberg to pick up XJP Thought study again. Must be rusty after a decade long hiatus.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump to direct Japan’s $550bn investment in US after deal with Tokyo​

Japan has agreed to let Donald Trump decide where $550bn worth of its capital is invested in the US as part a deal to avoid high tariffs, according to an unpublished memorandum signed by the two countries on Wednesday.
The memo, signed on Thursday when Trump officially enacted the trade deal, also gives Japan just 45 days to fund projects earmarked by the president — or face the reimposition of his steep tariffs.

The unusual terms agreed between the US president and the world’s fourth-largest economy underscore the extraordinary lengths that Washington’s trading partners will go to in order to secure tariff relief.
Japan, one of the Washington’s closest allies, had faced a tariff on its exports to the US of 25 per cent. The new deal reduces it to 15 per cent.

South Korea and the EU have also pledged to plough huge sums into the American economy in a bid to avert punitive taxes on their exports.

But the details surrounding such promises have until now been hazy — and Washington and other foreign capitals have offered diverging accounts of the terms.

Japanese officials previously offered a different account from Trump’s officials about how the proceeds of their investment into the US would be split with Washington, suggesting the shares would reflect the size of each country’s investment.

The new memorandum released on Thursday showed that the US would strongly benefit from the profits on Japan’s $550bn worth of investments.

The countries will evenly split the cash flow generated until Japan’s investment is paid off — at which point the US will take 90 per cent of the proceeds.

The deal is the latest in a series of unorthodox moves by the president aimed at boosting US government profit and reordering global trade to favour his “America First” agenda.

Last month, Trump struck a deal with US chipmakers Nvidia and AMD that will see them pay the administration a portion of revenue generated by chip sales in China. The White House has also said it would take a 10 per cent stake in chipmaker Intel.

Trump also earlier approved this year took a golden share in US Steel as part of his approval of Japanese producer Nippon Steel’s $15bn takeover of the company.

The billions of dollars promised to the US by Japan come as part of a broader deal struck to lower Trump’s punitive so-called reciprocal tariffs. Aside from dropping the headline rate, the US also reduced the levy on Japanese cars and car parts from 27.5 per cent to 15 per cent.

The US codified the new tariff rates in an executive order at a ceremony with Japanese officials at the commerce department.

Earlier this year, Trump framed Japan’s proposed investment pledge as a “signing bonus”, and said the Asian country had “bought down” US tariffs, although US levies on imports from Japan are higher than they were before the president returned to office.

The memorandum said Trump would be given the final pick of potential investment projects put to him by an investment committee chaired by US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick.

The memo also sets out that the investment committee should attempt to choose Japanese suppliers to “provide goods and services” for any of the projects invested in, where possible.

“This initiative could have a positive medium- to long-term impact on Japanese exports, depending on the procurement ratios,” Morgan Stanley economist Takeshi Yamaguchi wrote in a note to clients on Friday.
Japan has agreed to let Donald Trump decide where $550bn worth of its capital is invested in the US as part a deal to avoid high tariffs
The countries will evenly split the cash flow generated until Japan’s investment is paid off — at which point the US will take 90 per cent of the proceeds.
 
Top