Miscellaneous News

supercat

Colonel
Four reasons why China is not ready to lead the world though US leadership is dying: :eek:
1) Trump will continue doing his best to contain China.
2) China has too few bases around the world, which significantly limits its global influence. Meanwhile, building more bases during peacetime is too sensitive, and can't be accomplished in a short time.
3) Like US, China's economy is also problematic. CNY is also not ready to become a global reserve currency. Gigantic paradigm reforms are needed in China's economy.
4) China's current 2035 vision doesn't tell too much about its global interference. Which means its leaders are still not ready to do too much abroad.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Free version:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
jcdRA6h.gif


Next time someone tells you that China is the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gas:
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
In the long term, that may be true, but the situation is a bit more nuanced than that. First off, it's a matter of economics. Even though the rare earth restrictions has been big news, the actual monetary value of what the US buys is very little: just $150 million a year. That means that it would be very easy to stockpile large quantities if they were given unlimited access. Another big consideration is that these critical materials are used in both military and civilian applications. Some of these materials are dual use, but quite a bit of it only has a military application. China is thus able to ban these military materials altogether while still making civilian materials available.

And then there's the matter of timing. Right now, there's an arms race going on between China and the US but the Americans haven't fully realized that they're in a race yet. Because of that, American weapons stocks are probably at their lowest point in decades, having expended much of it on Ukraine, the Red Sea operations, and on Israel. To rebuild these stocks, they need more production and more production means more critical materials. With the materials ban in place, the US has very little reserves and that's going to be a hard limit on what they can make. Currently, the biggest need is for munitions, but it also impacts all sorts of military vehicles and other equipment as well.

Next is the question of the West building its own critial material capacity. While most of these materials are available all over the place, it's not easy or quick to implement any of the stages of making production-ready components: mining, refining, and processing. Theoretically, some amount of materials can be made ready within 5 years, but because of the lack of financial incentives and technical expertise, it's more realistic that the wait will be 10 years at the earliest for most materials. Some key materials might be 20+ years away. This next decade is where the Chinese MIC has the chance of surpassing the Americans. If the American MIC is crippled during this period, then it might give China an advantage that might be unsurmountable for decades.

The next 10 years is critical for China.

It's when:

1. any technology gaps are eliminated, notably in semiconductors and passenger aviation.
2. China zooms ahead in new technology sectors such as robots, drones, EVs, energy, etc
3. it becomes obvious that the Chinese economy is at least 2x the size of the US

After 10 years, there shouldn't be any contest...
 

Eventine

Junior Member
Registered Member
jcdRA6h.gif


Next time someone tells you that China is the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gas:
The research behind this came out five years ago, when it got posted to major social media sites in the West like Reddit guess what the response was?

“Chinese / Russian propaganda!!!”

And then just recently Trump got rid of the climate change subsidies with the aim to up scale oil & coal power in the US.

Let’s be honest here. The average citizen in the West is illiterate, racist, and stupid. This combination of traits cannot be corrected or reasoned with. It can only be crushed through hard power - economic, military, and demographic.

As the West descends further into fascism (MAGA, radical right, etc.), the only protection the rest of the world has is to disarm & neutralize their capabilities for destruction. Which only China has the potential to be able to do.

It was Europeans who colonized >80% of the world in their “will to power” and “manifest destiny” and who planned for the wholesale enslavement and/or extermination of other races at the height of their power (before hubris & in fighting brought them down).

Appealing to their better side / objectivity will never work. To fascists, mercy is for the weak.
 
Last edited:

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member

If Soros didn’t die from a blown gasket when Bessent defected to the Trump cause then the man may very well be immortal. Then again, it is entirely possible that he is a Soros plant.

The tale of Scott Bessent is almost cliche. His mother was married four or five times, his father went bankrupt no less than twice, and he himself was a homosexual growing up in the American South of the 1960s and 1970s.

Despite the complications of his upbringing, Bessent was a smart guy, went on to Yale, found a place for himself in high finance, and hit his stride under Soros' tutelage. Bessent is or was supposedly like a son to Soros, which is believable given how long the former worked for the latter,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and where it got him in life.

However, story goes the Soros financial kingdom offered too small of a pond for a man of Bessent's ambitions, especially as a non-biological son. So as he became more established, Bessent embarked on his own as an asset manager at least twice (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), and of course with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

It almost makes you wonder if Bessent went out of his way to become Treasury Secretary to "prove something to dad."

Soros is most likely quite pleased with his protege: he might be notorious for funding woke and shitlib causes, but that's just a means to an end. Ideology and left-right divides are just decor to these sort of guys, political capture is what matters.

It's possible that Treasury Secretary Bessent is some sort of plant, but it's more likely that his role within the current administration represents a truce or even a temporary alliance between the Trump and Soros camps.
 

Aegrotare

New Member
Registered Member
FCAS is most likely history, the French supremacy complex has hit them again. France wants Dassault to have 80% of the workshare and with the engines already under an sharing agreement this means they want everything but parts of the engines. This is not acceptable for Germany or Spain so this will be the end of FCAS. The big question is, what will be next?
Miscellaneous News

FCAS: Will France receive 80 percent of the new New Generation Fighter?



Eric Trappier, CEO of French aircraft manufacturer Dassault, has pointed out on several occasions in the past that, in his view, his company can build a new fighter jet without the support of third parties. Furthermore, he is dissatisfied with the distribution of tasks in the French-German-Spanish armaments project Future Combat Air System (FCAS) and, in an interview during the Paris Air Show a few weeks ago, called for clear leadership in the FCAS sub-project to develop a new fighter jet – the New Generation Fighter. As an alternative, he raised the prospect of Dassault withdrawing from the programme.



According to reports, the disputes within the FCAS consortium have already led to the fact that the bids for the upcoming phase 2 of the project have still not been finalised. In this phase, airworthy demonstrators are to be built.



As hartpunkt has now learned from well-informed sources, the French government is said to have thrown its weight behind Dassault's demands. According to reports, the Ministry of Defence in Berlin has been informed that France is seeking an 80 per cent share of the work share for the New Generation Fighter.



If this is true, it would completely overturn the division of tasks between the nations and industrial partners that was agreed upon in lengthy negotiations. There would then no longer be any question of equality between the partners. Observers assume that, with its demand for more than three-quarters of the work share, France is seeking design sovereignty for both the aircraft and the system of systems, in which the fighter is the central element.



For German fighter aircraft construction, this would probably mean the end in the long term, as all essential components would be in French hands. The development and construction of so-called Collaborative Combat Aircraft, unmanned combat aircraft accompanying the fighter, is unlikely to compensate for this loss in terms of mass and expertise. According to a study by the German Aerospace Industries Association (BDLI), the 38 Eurofighters in Tranche 4 alone secure around 7,800 high-tech jobs at more than 100 companies in Germany for the German Armed Forces.



Christoph Schmid, SPD spokesman for the Air Force and FCAS in the Bundestag's Defence Committee, has long heard rumours from industry circles about possible efforts by Dassault to rebalance the fighter's work share, but has not yet received official confirmation.



If the French government does indeed demand an 80 per cent share and does not withdraw this demand, Schmid believes that this could spell the end for the joint project. ‘We cannot agree to that,’ Schmid said in an interview with hartpunkt. This is because accepting the demand would mean giving up too much independence and sovereignty and ultimately financing a French project with German money.



The BDLI was not available for comment. An Airbus spokesperson said in response to an enquiry: "We do not comment on discussions that governments may or may not be having. As we have emphasised on several occasions, we remain committed to FCAS, all previous agreements and everything that this entails for Europe. The coming months until the end of the year will be decisive in enabling us to move quickly into the actual development phase of the programme. This is essential in view of the increasing global security challenges facing Europe and the need for sovereign high-tech weapon systems."



A spokesperson for the Federal Ministry of Defence was not available for comment at short notice. However, according to sources within the Ministry of Defence, the existing agreements within the FCAS consortium continue to apply to the German side. Since the new demands are being made by France, the solution must also be sought there, they say. It now remains to be seen how the players involved, including employees and suppliers, will react to the French initiative. The works council of Airbus Defence and Space has announced a staff meeting at short notice for today, Monday, which will also address FCAS and Dassault.



Lars Hoffmann


Translated with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(free version)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Also is this the right place to post this?
 
Top