Miscellaneous News

Cygnus

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reoriented the U.S. military to prioritize deterring China’s seizure of Taiwan and shoring up homeland defense by “assuming risk” in Europe and other parts of the world, according to a secret internal guidance memo that bears the fingerprints of the conservative Heritage Foundation, including some passages that are nearly word-for-word duplications of text published by the think tank last year.

The document, known as the Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance and marked “secret/no foreign national” in most passages, was distributed throughout the Defense Department in mid-March and signed by Hegseth. It outlines, in broad and sometimes partisan detail, the execution of President Donald Trump’s vision to prepare for and win a potential war against Beijing and defend the United States from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama Canal.

The first Trump administration and the Biden administration characterized China as the greatest threat to the U.S. and postured the force to prepare for and deter conflict in the Pacific region. But Hegseth’s guidance is extraordinary in its description of the potential invasion of Taiwan as the exclusive animating scenario that must be prioritized over other potential dangers — reorienting the vast U.S. military architecture toward the Indo-Pacific region beyond its homeland defense mission.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The divide and conquer plan. Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde or Good Cop and Bad Cop routine conducted by the US every 4 years is so tiresome. It is turning into a broken record.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Until combat warplanes that can travel at sub-orbital altitudes and capable of crossing the Pacific in mere hours can be deployed en masse, aircraft carriers will never become obsolete.

Instead, what will happen is that the methods of engineering and fielding aircraft carriers evolving and transforming.
 

tamsen_ikard

Junior Member
Registered Member
Until combat warplanes that can travel at sub-orbital altitudes and capable of crossing the Pacific in mere hours can be deployed en masse, aircraft carriers will never become obsolete.

Instead, what will happen is that the methods of engineering and fielding aircraft carriers evolving and transforming.
Not true at all. If anti-ship missiles become so good that fleets protecting the carrier fails to intercept then a carrier is just an expensive waste of money and men.
 

Ringsword

Junior Member
Registered Member
Like I always say, this is straight out of the comic books.

The lying Liberal media and Faux News.

What a combo!

Till eternity! Trump!

:D:rolleyes:
Have you ever watched the very good scifi series "Babylon 5" where the Centauri Ambassador Londo Mollari advises earth not to attack the far superior Minbari and earth of course ignores his sage advice whereupon the diaster unfolds for earth in the war Mollari says about earth's politicians/military leaders: "stupidity and arrogance all in one package,how convenient" Describes india perfectly and now Trump's :confused: :confused: :confused: USA to the max.but still dangerous for China
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Not true at all. If anti-ship missiles become so good that fleets protecting the carrier fails to intercept then a carrier is just an expensive waste of money and men.

Then, by your logic - If anti-ship missiles become so good such that no warship can ever defend the carriers from them, then everyone shouldn't bother with building any warships anymore. Because it's not just aircraft carriers that becomes an expensive waste of money and men, but also just about any other types of warships, as they would be similarly vulnerable to those anti-ship missiles.

Which is rather nonsensical, of course.
 
Last edited:

tamsen_ikard

Junior Member
Registered Member
Then, by your logic - If anti-ship missiles become so good such that no warship can ever defend the carriers from them, then everyone shouldn't bother with building any warships anymore. Because it's not just aircraft carriers that becomes an expensive waste of money and men, but also just about any other types of warships, as they would be similarly vulnerable to those anti-ship missiles.

Which is rather nonsensical, of course.
Armored knights are no longer active, right? Well it could happen to warships too. If anti-ship missiles and drones become so good that surface ships simply cannot defend against them then surface ships could become obsolete. Then navies might switch to only have submarines which will hide in the terrain of deep water to prevent detection.

There is a reason soldiers no longer fight in open fields, it's impossible to defend against bullets and artillery. Same thing could happen to surface ships. They are too slow, completely exposed and go down easily.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Armored knights are no longer active, right? Well it could happen to warships too. If anti-ship missiles and drones become so good that surface ships simply cannot defend against them then surface ships could become obsolete. Then navies might switch to only have submarines which will hide in the terrain of deep water to prevent detection.

There is a reason soldiers no longer fight in open fields, it's impossible to defend against bullets and artillery. Same thing could happen to surface ships. They are too slow, completely exposed and go down easily.
Do soldiers not have kevlar vests and helmets?

Could surface ships not simply evolve their tactics and operate outside of antiship and drone range?
 
Top