Trump and Gulf Monarchies ties have much longer history. and Putin/Xi does not play Golf with Trump that they will know real opinion of Trump . Gulf Monarchies makes an investment thats why they have this extreme wealth and Soft Power that unleash wars on there opponents. They are not vassals.
Just give you clue of the wealth. Kadyrov said that we must use new technologies that are not available to anyone regardless of the cost. this prepared statement from some one that want to test new weopons. what is costly in his eyes have very different meaning.
There was a time when Donald Trump the real estate developer turned reality TV star welcomed GCC elites as LPs. That time has long passed.
You're welcome to disagree, but if Uncle Sam actually considered GCC sheikdoms as more than vassals, then the UAE or KSA would've received F-35s already like Israel.
Not trying to be impolite or to dismiss our Arab friends, but I don't see the point to applying makeup on the American political establishment's view and treatment of GCC sheikdoms.
Fun fact. Chihuahuas were bred by the Aztecs to be both pets and food.
Chihuahuas were also bred as "alarms" for all practical purposes. It's why they like to bark so much, and probably also why the Aztecs may have felt a need to permanently silence them on occasion.
You are right that both China and Russia are clear eyed about America’s totally transparent intentions with their latest ‘peace’ talks. However, it’s actually entirely possible, advantageous even, for Russia to go along with it if it can secure the necessary concessions from the Americans.
The primary reason would be that America and Ukraine won’t be the only ones who can take advantage of the ensuing pause in the conflict to rearm and resupply.
Russia is already winning the logistics war against America and the rest of NATO with no direct military imports from China. How do you think the re-arm race will go when China full-sends military exports to Russia after a ceasefire is agreed?
Russia is achieving a favourable KD ratio right now, but there are fundamental issues with its war machine that is hard, if not impossible to fix while they are in a full scale war and China isn’t willing to sell arms to a participant in active combat. But with a pause in the fighting and the full catalogue of Chinese arms unlocked, Russia can fundamentally revamp its military and give it a quantum leap in a couple of years. Then, when it is ready, it can basically manufacture any pretext it wants to restart the war and achieve far more favourable exchange ratios while also being able to conduct proper combined arms warfare instead of its current grinding attritional slog.
You're absolutely correct that in the grand scheme of things Pax Americana intends to perpetuate Pax Americana.
However, for Trump himself, what matters now is his legacy, and he couldn't care less whether that is accomplished as
Donald the Conqueror, or
Donald the Peacemaker, who gave the American Empire a respite to rearm and rebuild (after decades of quagmires to reassert its hegemony).
Considering Trump's statements and policies, I think it's fair to say that Trump aspires to be remembered as the leader who brought America years of peace that made way for a new era of industrial reconstruction and economic prosperity after decades of relative decline. He knows that today's Uncle Sam isn't the 800 pound silverback who stood tall in the 1950s, 1990s or even 2000s. Why else would he want to "Make America Great Again?"
However, for better or worse, whether Trump succeeds or not is to be determined, especially as such humility for peace and respite remains rare in Congress.