Miscellaneous News

sinophilia

Junior Member
Registered Member
Automation will solve this. As more processes get automated 20th century capitalism will have to adjust or fail. I say let the machines "pay" for it.

IMHO, 20th century capitalism will be become less and less viable as the world progresses technologically in the 21st century.

Yea let’s just hope automation solves it in the way these futuristic predictions are made, and if not then cool Chinese are just fucked with an aging declining population.

This is so silly and mad. In fact, the PBOC in the link that was posted criticized this repeated talking point.

But I’ll go even further. Even if automation resolved this one aspect, it wouldn’t solve the problem of having less young and innovative minds to CREATE new technologies. While competitors may be growing their populations, your ideal world is for massive hopeful breakthroughs to be made so that we can just end up caring efficiently for a bunch of old people but with no future to show for it.

Innovation is done by people, and the more smart ones the better. Like Bezos said, he wants trillion of humans across the Solar System, because that’s a billion Einstein’s and Von Neumann’s.

But I guess your solution for that too is some hopeful dream of god-like AGI to replace Chinese youth, as if this is a bet that should be made! If AGI comes great, but such dreams can’t be relied on. The consequence of these technologies being delayed is China falling behind for decades if it doesn’t make sure it’s demographics are healthy as backup.

If China ends up in population decline and all we have to show for it is people speaking the same sentences about automation, then China is fucked like Japan is. They’ve been talking about automation since the 1980s.
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Yea let’s just hope automation solves it in the way these futuristic predictions are made, and if not then cool Chinese are just fucked with an aging declining population.

This is so silly and mad. In fact, the PBOC in the link that was posted criticized this repeated talking point.

But I’ll go even further. Even if automation resolved this one aspect, it wouldn’t solve the problem of having less young and innovative minds to CREATE new technologies. While competitors may be growing their populations, your ideal world is for massive hopeful breakthroughs to be made so that we can just end up caring efficiently for a bunch of old people but with no future to show for it.

Innovation is done by people, and the more smart ones the better. Like Bezos said, he wants trillion of humans across the Solar System, because that’s a billion Einstein’s and Von Neumann’s.

But I guess your solution for that too is some hopeful dream of god-like AGI to replace Chinese youth, as if this is a bet that should be made! If AGI comes great, but such dreams can’t be relied on. The consequence of these technologies being delayed is China falling behind for decades if it doesn’t make sure it’s demographics are healthy as backup.

If China ends up in population decline and all we have to show for it is people speaking the same sentences about automation, then China is fucked like Japan is. They’ve been talking about automation since the 1980s.
I agree with this. China should try to fix its demographics problem.

However I also think that automation is coming for real this time. We are currently undergoing the 4th Industrial Revolution, I am expecting that by 2035 automation would be unstoppable and would have tremendous momentum behind it (multiple times than now)
 

sinophilia

Junior Member
Registered Member
I agree with this. China should try to fix its demographics problem.

However I also think that automation is coming for real this time. We are currently undergoing the 4th Industrial Revolution, I am expecting that by 2035 automation would be unstoppable and would have tremendous momentum behind it (multiple times than now)

Does automation suddenly make it so that you no longer need young minds to innovate? Not unless you have AGI, but I’m guessing we’ll be hearing that talking point too at some point.

The more Chinese the better, and if the primary concern currently is resource constraints, then AT least get the TFR to 2.4 so it’s somewhat stable. China’s TFR might be as low as 1.4 now.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
@Temstar more news from 52051 (Pakistan defense forum)

Source from Weibo claim the submarines were forced by 054 to surface when they are trying to stalk Liaoning CV group.

微信图片_20210415103119.png
That’s one sub, where is the other?

Would be unusual to have two subs trailing the Liaoning, especially so for one of them to be a boomer, as their only (both in the SSBN and SSGN roles) job should literally be to just go and hide as far away from anything remotely hostile as possible.

If the USN is sending their boomers on such tailing missions, it would signal a dangerous degree of overconfidence in the untouchability of their subs. It would not surprise me at all if that was the case given the ridiculous amount of smoke the US submarine community have been blowing up their own arses for decades from living off their glory days making fools out of the Soviets.

But the PLAN is an entirely different class of opponent altogether, and if legit, this would positively be a textbook example of a major flex as a means to send a strong and unambiguous signal - your subs are nowhere like as untouchable as you seem to think.

This would be a significant capacity reveal, as the USN clearly would have had no idea their subs were basically sitting ducks in plain sight as far as the PLAN was concerned when the USN thought they were doing sneaky-sneaks beyond the sight and reach of the PLAN.

If real, this makes me even more worried something is about to go down with Taiwan, as you do not freely give up such a massive advantage.

Now the USN squids are going to be scared and scrambling to try to figure out just how vulnerable they really are and basically having to completely re-do all their risk assessments and operating procedures and would have no idea of their viability and survivability in a shooting war against the PLAN. Whereas before they would have had been the most (over) confident and gung-ho of any US military brand at the prospect of going hot against Chinese forces.

I cannot help but feel this was done to warn off the US from directly intervening in any Taiwan conflict by using their subs as first responders to try to score cheap kills.

It would obviously be far more impactful for the PLAN to continue keeping this secret till then, and absolutely annihilated the USN submarine fleet, but I think two main factors meant they preferred to scare them off instead.

Firstly, killing the entire USN pacific sub fleet would be a major scalp, but it would also mean China and America are in a direct shooting war with no clear or easy de-escalation path. And after such a humiliating and devastating opening blow, risks are high that the US would do something stupid to try to even the score that could cause things to go well and truly down the MAD path, which no one wants.

The second factor would be environmental. All USN subs are nuclear, and operating in a Taiwan scenario, they would all be killed close off the Chinese coast. Can you imagine the long lasting environmental catastrophe all those blown open reactors would cause just by themselves?
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yellen Plans to Spare China From Currency Manipulator Label​

Wow China was granted mercy by Empress Yellen. God bless the US that it had the magnanimity to spare China from labelling it the all-feared and powerful "Currency Manipulator" term.

News have reported that Xi was literally shaking in his home awaiting the final decision by the God Emperor US. Sources have said that upon hearing the result, Xi personally ordered for 1000 tons of gold to be sent to the White House to express his thanks to the emperor.

Good guy US protects little China once again!
 

ShariQ Ansari

New Member
Registered Member
That’s one sub, where is the other?

Would be unusual to have two subs trailing the Liaoning, especially so for one of them to be a boomer, as their only (both in the SSBN and SSGN roles) job should literally be to just go and hide as far away from anything remotely hostile as possible.

If the USN is sending their boomers on such tailing missions, it would signal a dangerous degree of overconfidence in the untouchability of their subs. It would not surprise me at all if that was the case given the ridiculous amount of smoke the US submarine community have been blowing up their own arses for decades from living off their glory days making fools out of the Soviets.

But the PLAN is an entirely different class of opponent altogether, and if legit, this would positively be a textbook example of a major flex as a means to send a strong and unambiguous signal - your subs are nowhere like as untouchable as you seem to think.

This would be a significant capacity reveal, as the USN clearly would have had no idea their subs were basically sitting ducks in plain sight as far as the PLAN was concerned when the USN thought they were doing sneaky-sneaks beyond the sight and reach of the PLAN.

If real, this makes me even more worried something is about to go down with Taiwan, as you do not freely give up such a massive advantage.

Now the USN squids are going to be scared and scrambling to try to figure out just how vulnerable they really are and basically having to completely re-do all their risk assessments and operating procedures and would have no idea of their viability and survivability in a shooting war against the PLAN. Whereas before they would have had been the most (over) confident and gung-ho of any US military brand at the prospect of going hot against Chinese forces.

I cannot help but feel this was done to warn off the US from directly intervening in any Taiwan conflict by using their subs as first responders to try to score cheap kills.

It would obviously be far more impactful for the PLAN to continue keeping this secret till then, and absolutely annihilated the USN submarine fleet, but I think two main factors meant they preferred to scare them off instead.

Firstly, killing the entire USN pacific sub fleet would be a major scalp, but it would also mean China and America are in a direct shooting war with no clear or easy de-escalation path. And after such a humiliating and devastating opening blow, risks are high that the US would do something stupid to try to even the score that could cause things to go well and truly down the MAD path, which no one wants.

The second factor would be environmental. All USN subs are nuclear, and operating in a Taiwan scenario, they would all be killed close off the Chinese coast. Can you imagine the long lasting environmental catastrophe all those blown open reactors would cause just by themselves?
Please provide me with link to PDF
 

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
Does automation suddenly make it so that you no longer need young minds to innovate? Not unless you have AGI, but I’m guessing we’ll be hearing that talking point too at some point.

The more Chinese the better, and if the primary concern currently is resource constraints, then AT least get the TFR to 2.4 so it’s somewhat stable. China’s TFR might be as low as 1.4 now.
Yes it does, because when people have time they can have ideas and when they have resources they can take risks.
 
Top